Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Audrey Doering - Knowledge

Source 📝

448: 574:: Let me explain, Most of the sources come from The Doerings social media accounts, twin documents from ABC video footage, and private life being exposed through the career websites (YMCA or Violin place). Put them all together, including the study from Cambridge University and the DNA tests from ABC, and you get a damn good article with secondary sources with multiple links. 449:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/twin-research-and-human-genetics/article/rearedapart-chinese-twins-chance-discoverytwinbased-research-twin-study-of-media-use-twin-relations-over-the-life-span-breastfeeding-oppositesex-twinsprint-and-online-media-twins-in-fashion-second-twin-pair-born-to-tennis-star-twin-primes-twin-pandas/2B6F5A486AC2EA5A0CC3F0ABA34E18C6/core-reader
551:
Okay, you got me, I can't find shit! Scraping at the bottom of the FUCKING BARREL isn't enough huh? Stop being PC and tell me the fuck is wrong with it. I founded video footage that's from ABC, which filmed the document from the newspaper, Doering personal information from social media, 1 news report
370:
The issue isn't that you did a bad job, it's that reliable sources have not written enough about this topic. You could spend a decade working on this article nonstop and it wouldn't change a thing unless more reliable sources publish content about Audrey Doering. I would suggest that you read through
357:
Is this imperfect? I don't understand. I did research and translation stuff on the internet for just this one story for 2 hours straight. It's like a math teacher saying you did all of you multiplication wrong, even though you gotten the answers right. This article has a neutral point of view about
552:
about the heart surgery, and this SHIT ISN'T ENOUGH? FINE, delete my hard work (bitch or bastard), your seriously pissing me off. I know the rules or regulation shit says not to take it personal, BUT HUMANS AREN'T AUTOMATED STEPHEN HAWKING MACHINES THAT KNOW EVERYTHING!
203: 471:
There's two problems with this source. One is that it is still fundamentally about the "twins separated at birth" thing, which means that it doesn't do much to break out of the
156: 197: 532:, reliable sources, and the extent to which the sources provided are already scraping the bottom of the barrel suggests that we are unlikely to find any such coverage. 257: 301: 279: 103: 528:
At this point, the issues raised in the nomination statement still haven't been addressed. The article will be deleted if you can't find more coverage in
88: 475:
criteria. Two is that it is not independent, as in this article the author states that she was the one who facilitated the reunion of the two sisters.
163: 238:
criteria. All information outside of the viral human-interest story about being reunited with her sister is from non-reliable sources.
129: 124: 133: 116: 83: 76: 17: 556:
December 27, 2019 21:19pm (UTC) THIS ARTICLE BULLSHIT, DUH, DELETE PROFILE, DUH, NO RELIABLE SOURCES, DUH, DELETE HORSESHIT
218: 185: 515: 97: 93: 650: 40: 179: 608: 585: 633: 612: 589: 543: 519: 486: 462: 440: 420: 394: 352: 335: 315: 293: 271: 249: 175: 58: 120: 646: 331: 36: 225: 503: 458: 416: 112: 64: 604: 581: 529: 211: 375:. If you can justify that this subject doesn't meet all three criteria listed there, and that it 348: 511: 72: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
645:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
497: 327: 191: 629: 621: 600: 472: 403:
I found a reliable source from Cambridge University about their birth names and life from
372: 235: 494: 536: 479: 433: 387: 380: 344: 308: 286: 264: 242: 575: 563: 553: 507: 453: 411: 362: 150: 404: 358:
her early life all the way to her "private" career. Do you agree with me or not?
625: 54: 562:
Reliable sources have been discovered through the internet. Cased closed.
641:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
603:. It's a heartwarming story that belongs on GMA and not here. 498:
http://www.mymeetscores.com/gymnast.pl?gymnastid=21387727
146: 142: 138: 210: 500:
Ros, can you write about this in the Career section?
495:
https://myusagym.com/meets/past/58902/results/12906/
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 653:). No further edits should be made to this page. 300:Note: This discussion has been included in the 278:Note: This discussion has been included in the 256:Note: This discussion has been included in the 383:, then I will happily change my vote to keep. 224: 8: 104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 258:list of People-related deletion discussions 501: 456: 414: 302:list of China-related deletion discussions 299: 280:list of Women-related deletion discussions 277: 255: 620:This is about as clear-cut a case of 580:second keep vote by same user struck. 7: 24: 89:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 578:December 27, 2019 23:26 (UTC) 566:December 27, 2019 22:04 (UTC) 1: 634:14:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 613:05:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC) 590:05:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC) 544:20:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 520:19:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 487:18:57, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 463:18:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 441:17:52, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 421:17:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 395:03:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC) 353:20:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 336:19:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 316:18:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 294:18:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 272:18:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 250:18:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 234:This biography doesn't meet 79:(AfD)? Read these primers! 59:19:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 670: 643:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 624:as there can be. Best, 429:Provide a link please. 77:Articles for deletion 599:This is literally 592: 522: 506:comment added by 465: 423: 407:. How about that? 318: 296: 274: 94:Guide to deletion 84:How to contribute 661: 579: 229: 228: 214: 166: 154: 136: 74: 34: 669: 668: 664: 663: 662: 660: 659: 658: 657: 651:deletion review 535: 478: 432: 386: 343:: fails GNG. – 307: 285: 263: 241: 171: 162: 127: 111: 108: 71: 68: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 667: 665: 656: 655: 637: 636: 615: 605:ThatMontrealIP 582:ThatMontrealIP 549: 548: 547: 546: 533: 492: 491: 490: 489: 476: 461:comment added 446: 445: 444: 443: 430: 419:comment added 409: 408: 400: 399: 398: 397: 384: 360: 359: 355: 338: 320: 319: 305: 297: 283: 275: 261: 239: 232: 231: 168: 113:Audrey Doering 107: 106: 101: 91: 86: 69: 67: 65:Audrey Doering 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 666: 654: 652: 648: 644: 639: 638: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 616: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 595: 594: 593: 591: 587: 583: 577: 573: 572: 567: 565: 561: 557: 555: 545: 542: 541: 540: 531: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 499: 496: 488: 485: 484: 483: 474: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 464: 460: 455: 451: 450: 442: 439: 438: 437: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 422: 418: 413: 406: 402: 401: 396: 393: 392: 391: 382: 378: 374: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 356: 354: 350: 346: 342: 339: 337: 333: 329: 325: 322: 321: 317: 314: 313: 312: 303: 298: 295: 292: 291: 290: 281: 276: 273: 270: 269: 268: 259: 254: 253: 252: 251: 248: 247: 246: 237: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 165: 161: 158: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 105: 102: 99: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 80: 78: 73: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 642: 640: 617: 596: 576:User:Junkrak 570: 569: 568: 564:User:Junkrak 559: 558: 554:User:Junkrak 550: 538: 537: 502:— Preceding 493: 481: 480: 454:User:Junkrak 452: 447: 435: 434: 410: 389: 388: 376: 361: 340: 323: 310: 309: 288: 287: 266: 265: 244: 243: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 159: 70: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 457:—Preceding 415:—Preceding 405:Nancy Segal 328:Hyperbolick 198:free images 647:talk page 530:secondary 37:talk page 649:or in a 622:WP:BLP1E 601:WP:BLP1E 539:Rosguill 534:signed, 516:contribs 504:unsigned 482:Rosguill 477:signed, 473:WP:BLP1E 436:Rosguill 431:signed, 390:Rosguill 385:signed, 373:WP:BLP1E 345:DarkGlow 311:Rosguill 306:signed, 289:Rosguill 284:signed, 267:Rosguill 262:signed, 245:Rosguill 240:signed, 236:WP:BLP1E 157:View log 98:glossary 39:or in a 508:Junkrak 459:undated 417:undated 412:Junkrak 363:Junkrak 204:WP refs 192:scholar 130:protect 125:history 75:New to 618:Delete 597:Delete 381:WP:GNG 341:Delete 324:Delete 176:Google 134:delete 50:delete 626:GPL93 560:Keep: 379:meet 219:JSTOR 180:books 164:Stats 151:views 143:watch 139:links 16:< 630:talk 609:talk 586:talk 571:Keep 512:talk 377:does 349:talk 332:talk 212:FENS 186:news 147:logs 121:talk 117:edit 55:Tone 226:TWL 155:– ( 632:) 611:) 588:) 518:) 514:• 351:) 334:) 326:. 304:. 282:. 260:. 206:) 149:| 145:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 123:| 119:| 52:. 628:( 607:( 584:( 510:( 347:( 330:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 160:· 153:) 115:( 100:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Tone
19:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Audrey Doering

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Audrey Doering
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.