778:. As it just occurred and there's zero evidence there will be sustained coverage of it at all. Let alone enough to satisfy the notability guidelines. Knowledge isn't a news outlet and articles are not supposed to be on single, transient events that are only talked about in the news for a few days and then never come up again. Which is how most of these school shootings turn out. There was over 45 school shootings in America in 2019 and I doubt all or most of them have articles (or deserve to). Also, I'm not solid on a merge compared to delete, because it's not worth merging things that are not worthy of being in Knowledge in the first place. It's better just to get rid of content that shouldn't be contained in articles. Although, I'm not going to be that bothered if it closes as merge. I just don't think it's the best outcome. --
890:
coverage, because again, the amount doesn't matter here. It's not like the article can't be recreated in a couple of weeks or a month when there actually is sustained coverage, if there is, but until 100% CRYSTALL to say two worth of news coverage on anything constitutes or shows there will be sustained coverage. It's also 100% CRYSTAL to use the particulars of the case or other ones to argue this will still be a thing in a couple of months. Since it's purely speculation that it will be. Again though, it doesn't matter if it is still an article in 2 months, just recreate the article when it actually is. Until then, Knowledge isn't a news outlet and having an article full of nothing but breaking news from yesterday or the day before is totally treating it like it is one. --
920:
one. There was a lot of the same things said about why the article should be kept as your saying, "this will be a big story", "delete it in two months if there's no coverage anymore", "we're just trying to improve
Knowledge" Etc. Etc. You know what happened there? The article was deleted and rightfully so because after about 3 weeks it was never a thing again. Even though it had been covered in CNN, The New York Times, Etc. Etc. If the article had of been kept, it would have just been a waste of everyone's time to do another AfD for it later when the news dropped the story once the sensationalism died down. I can almost guarantee the same thing will happen here. Past precedence with what happened to similar articles sent to AfD matters also in the meantime. --
860:, etc. The local media in Knoxville certainly treats this as a high profile event and not just another neighborhood shooting. The recent surprising developments in the case make it much less likely that the media will drop the story quickly. The original police/TBI account of the shooting turned out to be incorrect, and now it comes out that it wasn't the student who shot the responding police officer. Now that the student's identity has been made public, it is known that he was a black teenager, while at least one of the responding police officers was white. The school itself, where this black teenager was killed by the police, has 87% minority student enrollment, with 77% black student enrollment.
1987:
notable or not like your doing. Plus, "protests" is a mush brained, meaningless word that has no bearing on something being notable anyway. No one is going to argue that the article should be kept if 15 angry kids from the school march around in front of it for a few days even if it is a "protest." Otherwise, they just passed a law in
Florida that anytime more then two people are gathered in one place it's a riot. So, I guess your standard there would be that literally everything involving more then two people in Florida that has a couple of news stories about it within a week of each other is notable "because riots."
1591:
it helps less then just not saying anything for reasons that should be really obvious. As far as you "responding" to the supposedly baseless accusation of not assuming good faith, the lack of faith your assuming comes from the fact that you think people who voted merge just need to read the latest sensationalist news story about it to change their minds. It's extremely bad faithed to act like people who voted differently then are just doing so out of ignorance of the subject or a lack of special information that you have access to and they don't for whatever reason. It just comes off as confrontational. --
1236:- we wait to see if it is beforehand. There's a ton of WP:acronyms that your comment here flies in the face of - some of which are beyond a consensus formed at an AfD discussion such as the pillars and what Knowledge is not. If you truly believe that Knowledge should be a breaking news site and not an encyclopedia, I wish you the best of luck in attempting to obtain a larger consensus (project-wide) for that - but until you do, I'll point out when !votes fly in the face of that project wide consensus against such "breaking news" things. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (
1412:. Daunte Wright was just one black 20-year-old black young man killed by the police under controversial circumstances, and Anthony Thompson Jr was just one 17-year-old back young man killed by the police under controversial circumstances. Of course, the Daunte Wright case received more and higher profile coverage, but an event does not need to be ITN worthy to merit an article. The Anthony Thompson Jr case continues to receive significant coverage, including from national media, and the events there are still unfolding.
536:, there was only one other school shooting in Nebraska's recorded history, and that one involved one injury and no fatalities. So while saying "the shooting was the deadliest school shooting in Nebraska's history" is literally true, it doesn't help make your case here. Note that I am not making light of shootings of anyone in any setting; all gun violence is tragic as far as I'm concerned. This is strictly about establishing what is and isn't notable enough to have a standalone article in this encyclopedia.
2118:
the merge counter arguments. If you have a good dispute point for why merging is bad, cool. Then provide it. I've asked several times though and you've just repeated the same old talking points of protests and people involved while not actually giving one or citing a guideline. I'll also add that criminal acts by their nature inherently get news coverage. Especially shootings and ones involving cops. So there has to be more then that to separate the notable ones from the non-notable ones. --
1441:. A black teenager was killed at school during an armed confrontation with the police. The original police account of the shooting turned out to be crucially incorrect. There is a bodycam video that the DA is refusing the release, despite a mounting community pressure to do so and a court suit by the city itself seeking to release the video. There have been escalating local racial justice protests over the shooting. The dead student's family hired
905:
That's what I am trying to do here. At the moment there is continuing significant coverage, both locally and nationally and there are (very) good reasons to believe that it will continue. Under these circumstances the correct thing is to keep the article now and, in the, unlikely in my view, case that the coverage will disappear in 2-3 months, nominate it for deletion then.
1576:, the highest profile national lawyer for these types of case. I provided examples of continued fresh coverage by national and international media. I did respond to a 'merge' opinion that provided reasoning that was, at least in my opinion, invalid on its face. And I responded to a baseless accusation of not assuming AGF. None of that constitutes bludgeoning.
2001:
be sustained coverage of the event and it just hasn't been long enough since it happened to say there has been or is going to be continued coverage. In the meantime, even the Fox News article you linked to discusses the 5 shootings that have happened at the school and isn't focused on the single shooting that this article is about. --
1927:
incident. A few outlets have even pivoted to articles about "Shootings at the school" in general instead of this specific one. Which really makes me think it's not going to be as notable story on it's own long-term. At least not enough to warrant a separate article or not just merging it into the schools article. --
1986:
So here's the thing, the protests where two days ago, going by the dates of the news articles about them they were only for 2 days and pretty insignificant, and they seem to have ended after the police wasn't charged. That's the problem with going with breaking news for every freaken metric of what's
1331:
notable before coverage exists - that's a key point of our subject notability guidelines, after all. A mass shooting by a former employee that resulted in 8 deaths is certainly much closer to that presumption than a shooting that resulted in no deaths (aside from the perpetrator) and only one injury.
1012:
Aside from the arguments that you've already made why it should not be deleted, what's particularly wrong with it being merged to the article about the school? Merging it seems like a good compromise to me consider it has some coverage as an event, but probably won't get enough to a separate article,
953:
Continued coverage can be indicated in section at High School page, but the suspect is dead, so there won't be a trial, suspect was armed, so don't expect some kind of charges against the police officer. At best an
Internal Affair investigation to see how officer was shot if not by the suspect's gun.
919:
There was a
Knowledge article about a mass shooting at a Wal-Mart distribution center in Red Bluff, California last year. That shooting had national coverage for the first couple of weeks after. Which people used to justify keeping the article when it was eventually AfDed for the same reasons as this
904:
Of course the sources I cited are from yesterday. I don't have a time machine. There will be more sources today and I'll add them. But when a significant event happens, we don't wait two months before creating a
Knowledge article about it. We exercise good judgement based on the indicators available.
2000:
Not to mention most things these days that are in the news involves some kind of legitimate protest. You think "protests" are enough for something to be notable, cool. Start an RfC about it then and see if you can get the notability guidelines changed over it. Until then though, there still needs to
1590:
Sorry, but you doing a running commentary of every breaking story of the thing isn't adding anything new or substantive to the discussion. Not every single little transient minutia of a subject is notable or helps in AfD discussions. Especially when it's something that is still ongoing. If anything,
1300:
Our standards do not exists in a vacuum and cannot be applied as some kind of abstract ideological principles devoid of context. So far nobody who argued for merge or delete undertook any substantive analysis of available coverage. The TOOSOON arguments presented so far basically really boil down to
2083:
that makes it clear "A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate
Knowledge article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person" and we have the schools
1193:
requires. It is always easier to delete an article than to create it. Where the indicators are that the event is likely to be notable, the standard course of action is to create an article now and renominate it for deletion later, in case the coverage disappears a few months from now, not the other
986:
The event is still getting some national coverage (present tense). Regarding its future impact, there are other indicators to consider apart from the trial. As I mentioned above, the racial aspect of the situation makes protests of some kind fairly likely and in fact some have happened already. The
2117:
And those things are are all your basing your keep arguments on. While you can base your keep arguments on whatever you want, it's still on you in these discussions to provide a guideline based rational for them and I haven't seen you do that. Whereas, there's plenty of guideline based reasons for
1285:
At least for me its a common sense decision about how to proceed based on how the guidelines fit this particular instance. You can't treat AfDs like its one or the other though like you are. I assume everyone else who voted merge is doing a similar calculation about it to me. Yet your arguing with
889:
All the articles you cited are from yesterday. Which is still only 2 days after the shooting and not sustained coverage. Sustained coverage has to be over a certain period of time. Hence why it's called "sustained" and I'm pretty sure two days worth of coverage doesn't count. Even if it's a lot of
795:
to article on the high school and get under control. This was a shoot out where an armed student opened fire on police responding to the fact that he was in the school armed, and the police returned fire which resulted in the student dieing. Knowledge is not news, and we need to stop creating news
1368:
is not really the best example to bring up for your argument. As the one who created it, I noticed the article wasn't up on
Knowledge while the breaking news coverage was minutes to an hour old. I created it once I learned of the death toll in that shooting, and I suspect that if the numbers were
2035:
Where did anything you've linked to say the protests involved "hundreds of people? From the video it like 20 or 30 students from the school at best. Also, is the fact that the protests have been smaller an indication that this story is picking up steam or dying down? The answer to that should be
447:
for now. The details are unclear at the moment, but this incident did happen at a school and it involved a fatality. That's fairly unusual, even for the U.S. There is a reasonable likelihood that the event will receive sustained coverage. The matter can be revisited in a few months to see if the
2078:
Alright then. Still though, there's nothing in the notability guidelines that says things that have protests around them are inherently more notable then things that don't. There's also nothing that makes a "school shooting" any more notable then any other type of shooting. In the meantime for
1027:
The event is still developing, and there are significant new ongoing developments that are being extensively covered by the media. E.g. there was a big BLM protest, a suit filed by the city administration seeking to override the DA's order that prevents the bodycam footage from being released,
1926:
From what I can tell there was like 2 articles in national outlets in the last week about how the officer won't be charged in the shooting. There's been zero about any kind of protests over it though. Let any ongoing ones or anything else indicating this will be an ongoing thing as a notable
1231:
on things is not in line with being an encyclopedia. This is exactly what the GNG is designed to prevent - articles about recent events (which are the definition of "routine news coverage") being used to justify notability of something that does not have true notability beyond the timeframe.
871:), the police response here will be scrutinized much more closely. It is unlikely that a story like this one will be buried and disappear quietly into the sunset even though it happened in a southern state. XavierItzm is correct, one does not need to have a crystal ball here to know that
1737:
As it happens, it was one person dying in this event, not two. One black teenage student killed by a police officer. But as I noted above, the number of fatalities has nothing to do with notability of a particular criminal event. What counts is the coverage of an event by
1403:
Responding since I was pinged. The number of fatalities in a particular incident is a totally arbitrary parameter and the incident does not have to be a mass shooting to be notable. Plenty of events with a single fatality are notable, e.g., to take a recent example,
1286:
everyone that disagrees with you. Despite the fact that we are following your standards. Just coming to different conclusions. That said nowhere does someone simply saying "do it my way because common sense brah" ever lead to anything besides pointless bickering.
813:- notable article about armed student hiding in a bathroom and resisting arrest. More coverage sure to emerge as the policemen's body cam video is released and as internal affairs comes out with its conclusion. You don't even need a crystal ball to know this.
1189:, and wait several months before creating it. We do not wait to create an article where continued significant coverage is available and all reasonable indications are that such coverage will continue. That is exactly the case here. That's not at all what
1266:
would have to be deleted on exactly the same grounds you are advancing now. That's not what we do. We look at the available coverage and other indicators of likely notability and make a common sense decision about how to proceed. That's what
1464:
says that the
Anthony Thompson case was mentioned at the Minnesota racial justice protest on Monday. Plus the local media in Knoxville continues to give the case high profile coverage. Calling this case "minor" completely disregards how the
1469:
have been covering it. The racial justice aspect of this case makes it different from many other school shootings and makes it highly improbable that in today's U.S. political, societal and media climate the story will quietly disappear.
202:
1909:: There is clearly significant coverage, including from national outlets, regarding this event. And the coverage is ongoing/sustained, which is perhaps unsurprising given the current racial and political climate in the United States.
1877:
by Nsk92 that collapsing the discussion only serves to obscure. No one would be offended by anything in that discussion to the point where it needs to be hidden from view though. Otherwise, 90% of AfD discussions would be collapsed.
1133:, announced that his office will be representing Anthony Thompson’s family. Crump released a statement denouncing the speed with which the police resorted to the use of force against a person of color in Anthony Thompson's case.
1087:
argument. The local media in
Knoxville continues to cover it as a high profile event, with new developments still unfolding. There are even continuing stories about the event in the national media from today and yesterday, e.g.
1823:
I collapsed a portion of a discussion that was getting heated after another editor who participated in that discussion agreed that collapsing would be a good idea but said that they didn't know how to make a collapse box
2054:. The protest yesterday was indeed smaller but we don't know what will happen today or tomorrow. However we do know that the media in Knoxville has not dropped the story or pushed it away. The top front page headline in
1872:
I don't think it was heated anyway. At least not anymore then a lot of these conversations get that aren't subsequently collapsing because of it. IMO the more important thing then "tone policing" is the clear
1571:
Of course I said something substantively new that I haven't said multiple times already. I brought up significant new developments in the case, such as escalating BLM protests around it and the involvement of
2088:
also makes it clear that having a relationship to something that is notable isn't enough for that thing to be notable. It's also clear that we should "Avoid criteria based on search engine statistics."
1827:. Regarding Michelle Obama's arms, we are not talking about somebody's arms here, we are talking about a young black man who was killed by the police in a country that is gripped by a racial unrest.
1206:'s lawyer in this case, as noted above, it is extremely unlikely that the media will suddenly drop this story or that the Knoxville community itself will stop treating it as a high profile matter.
196:
318:- Way too early to nominate for deletion, details are still emerging. Multiple victims including a police officer, it's a top news story right now in the UK and getting international coverage.
1949:
616:
597:
I don't know without looking more closely and doing various searches to see what kind of coverage those events received. I suspect that there are quite a few entries on that list that satisfy
136:
131:
1271:
happens in practice with new events (not just crimes, but new events of any kind). I am arguing my case based on the sources and the kind of coverage they actually provide here. You are not.
140:
2051:
1323:
policies/guidelines to "override" this by finding some way to finagle an article in to fit your idea that
Knowledge should be breaking news do not override the fact we simply aren't. There
2050:
The sources I cited above don't mention the size of the protests, but the sources cited in the article do. Here is another regional news source, from Nashville, about the Thursday protest:
123:
1319:- which by definition means that none of it counts for notability. Knowledge is not breaking news - this is a core principle of what Knowledge is/isn't - and your attempts at morphing
852:
558:
is not a good argument for deleting something, notability should be the deciding consideration. If there are school shootings that have received significant coverage and which satisfy
2019:
1803:
533:
1374:
1970:
562:, then any editors who have the relevant information should feel free and in fact encouraged to create articles about those events. Plus in this case the fatality is a kid.
492:
Yes, and it is a crying shame that we still don't have a separate article about that one, given that "the shooting was the deadliest school shooting in Nebraska's history".
990:
after learning that it was not him who shot the responding officer. And even if the sustained coverage does turn out to be just local, that still would still qualify under
163:
1336:- and that in and of itself is inappropriate and you should reconsider commenting if that's your basis for commenting on these sorts of AfD discussions. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (
863:. The prosecutors are refusing to release the police body camera footage and there have already been community protests. Given what is happening in the U.S. right now (
2061:
is about the fact that only one of the police body cameras in the incident worked properly, and the next top one concerns an internal KPD investigation of the incident
264:
2062:
1841:
Adamant1 was the person you were arguing with; Love of Corey (the person who said they didn't know how to collapse the discussion) had not posted in it previously.
1521:
I haven't questioned anyone's AGF and I am not bludgeoning the discussion. But I am making arguments that need to be made and drawing attention to new developments.
1553:
You've commented 9 times just today and nothing you have said adds anything new to the AfD discussion that you haven't stated multiple times already. I'd call that
2016:
583:. We have had so many school shootings with little to no fatalities and/or injuries at this point. Unless you're saying we should have articles for those as well.
1958:
855:
298:
1961:
1117:. In case anyone cares to pay attention to what's actually happening in the case and to which sources and how continue to cover it, today's (April 19) story in
723:
indicates this incident was an officer-involved shooting rather than a school shooting. If this article is somehow kept (which I strongly doubt), it may need a
580:
563:
281:
988:
1967:
249:
127:
1945:
You are incorrect on both counts. There have been way more than 2 articles in national outlets covering that none of the officers will be charged. E.g. CNN
702:. Tragic but sadly, given the large number of school shootings with multiple victims in the U.S., not notable enough for a separate encyclopedia article.
110:
1453:
95:
1437:. For those arguing for merge or delete, I'd like you to take another look at what happened in this case so far and how it is actually being covered by
1195:
1092:
2059:
217:
184:
1028:
growing controversy about the bodycam footage, etc. Trying to squeeze this info into the parent article about the school would immediately present
1955:
119:
71:
949:
to the High School's page. A crime scene with one deceased who was the suspect, one injury which may not have even come from the suspect. We are
2127:
2073:
2045:
2030:
2010:
1981:
1936:
1918:
1887:
1867:
1853:
1836:
1818:
1775:
1721:
1691:
1670:
1628:
1614:
1600:
1585:
1566:
1548:
1530:
1516:
1479:
1421:
1345:
1310:
1295:
1280:
1245:
1215:
1176:
1144:
1105:
1070:
1041:
1022:
1007:
977:
929:
914:
899:
884:
840:
822:
805:
787:
754:
745:
And when I say a "school shooting" here, I mean the archetypal definition of a student targeting at least one other student and/or teacher.
736:
711:
690:
669:
636:
610:
592:
574:
545:
527:
501:
487:
475:
457:
435:
414:
389:
375:
345:
327:
307:
290:
273:
256:
241:
65:
1605:
I suggest that this entire subthread either go into a collapse box or be moved to the AfD talk page if someone wants to continue it there.
178:
1780:
I am not sure why you have responded to almost every single "delete" or "merge" !vote with nearly identical lengthy go-offs, or why you
1396:
858:
2015:
Protests involving hundreds of people are not "insignificant". And the protests have not ended. There was a smaller protest on Saturday
1456:
1134:
480:
1459:
1315:
It doesn't matter what coverage is available now - virtually no coverage of "current events" can be described as anything other than
1450:
518:
crime spree. "Deadliest school shooting" may be an interesting tidbit, but that alone isn't enough sufficient basis for notability.
174:
720:
965:
1964:
555:
224:
90:
83:
17:
1946:
1185:
According to the same logic we should delete the article about every recent event from the last several days, including, say
831:
There's a huge difference between "more coverage" and "sustained coverage." Knowledge requires the latter, not the former. --
1089:
1032:
problems. There is already enough material for a standalone article here and there will be more as things develop further.
849:
623:
in general, and it'd be a mistake to create an article for each and every one of them without considering policies such as
1232:
Notability isn't temporary, but routine, local, or temporal news coverage does not contribute much at all to notability.
846:
1365:
1263:
1186:
104:
100:
1966:. There have been at least two subsequent national news stories specifically about the follow-up protests: Fox News,
190:
1462:
2156:
1709:
were tragic, yet do not justify the creation of 1,500 articles (one for every two people who died). Et cetera...
1539:
again. You've already made your points many times over; now it's time to let the AfD discussion take its course.
801:
40:
1449:, to represent them. The national media continues to cover the case in-depth. Just from earlier today we have AP
336:
The details are now in, and it's just one dead and one injured. Not particularly notable for a school shooting.
1751:
1405:
2018:, and it remains to be seen what will happen today. The city administration and the KPD are preparing for more
1369:
considerably lower than what we tragically got, we wouldn't have a Knowledge article on that incident at all.
1094:
1679:
1624:
1544:
1392:
1058:
1013:
and none of the keep "voters" have yet to say why they think merging it wouldn't be an acceptable option. --
954:
Event got national coverage, but any sustained coverage will probably be local. Either way article was made
767:
750:
732:
699:
678:
665:
632:
588:
523:
511:
471:
398:
341:
234:
53:
1914:
1755:
1706:
1341:
1241:
1172:
864:
845:
So far the coverage has shown no sign of disappearing, including continued national coverage, such as NYT
2152:
1952:
1687:
1259:
1233:
1084:
36:
2085:
1666:
1384:
971:
861:
818:
797:
515:
323:
61:
1705:
a notable event. My grandparents, while dearly missed, don't have an article about their death. The
1062:
1228:
1160:
1066:
1029:
872:
707:
541:
210:
2123:
2041:
2006:
1932:
1883:
1874:
1791:
1620:
1596:
1562:
1554:
1540:
1536:
1512:
1504:
1388:
1291:
1224:
1164:
1018:
925:
895:
836:
783:
746:
728:
686:
661:
628:
584:
519:
467:
431:
410:
337:
362:
1234:
Knowledge also should not attempt to judge "inidcators" that an event "is likely to be notable"
1152:- keep votes are all based on "it's too soon to delete this" - that's the opposite of what our
1910:
1795:
1784:
1337:
1255:
1237:
1190:
1168:
1156:
955:
950:
657:
624:
358:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2151:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
466:
We have a number of incidents at schools that left only one fatality and no articles for it.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2080:
1799:
1763:
1683:
1167:
and it can always be created later if it proves to be independently notable. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (
868:
775:
2069:
2026:
1977:
1863:
1832:
1771:
1662:
1610:
1581:
1526:
1475:
1417:
1306:
1276:
1211:
1140:
1118:
1101:
1037:
1003:
995:
959:
910:
880:
814:
606:
598:
570:
559:
497:
484:
453:
402:
368:
319:
253:
238:
57:
2052:
Hundreds protest in Knoxville after DA says no charges for officers in shooting at school
1849:
1814:
1717:
1381:) should not be created until we learn official casualty numbers from law enforcement.
703:
537:
302:
285:
268:
2119:
2037:
2002:
1928:
1879:
1759:
1743:
1592:
1558:
1508:
1500:
1333:
1287:
1203:
1130:
1014:
991:
921:
891:
832:
779:
682:
620:
427:
406:
1739:
1466:
1438:
1409:
1199:
1126:
1080:
619:
to consider. My point is that school shootings are just as frequent in the U.S. as
426:- If the merged section becomes too big, it can be split out into a new article. --
384:
1334:
you think that "the racial justice aspect of this" should be considered by editors
157:
1858:
Yes, they have. See the third post from the top within the collapse box content.
1332:
Your comment below also suggests that you're arguing for this to be kept because
1762:
case, the notability of the death of Anthony Thompson Jr comes mainly from the
1079:
Simply labeling an event "minor" without any reference to how it is covered by
2065:
2022:
1973:
1859:
1828:
1767:
1606:
1577:
1522:
1471:
1413:
1360:
1302:
1272:
1220:
1207:
1136:
1097:
1033:
999:
906:
876:
602:
566:
493:
449:
2055:
1843:
1808:
1732:
1711:
1573:
1446:
1122:
1701:
to the high school's article; two people dying is a tragedy, but it is not
1229:
push to be a breaking news source that has the most up to date information
361:. It is not the job of Knowledge to report on shootings as they happen.
554:
There is a myriad of notable topics for which we don't have articles.
1061:
It doesn't make sense to have a separate article about a minor event.
1408:. What matters for notability is the coverage the event receives in
383:: It just happened, school shootings are not minor criminal acts.
1227:. There is no deadline to have an article on something, and this
2147:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
233:
Relatively minor criminal act, should be a section of the main
1790:
d the previous thread where someone pointed out that this was
1262:
guidance. Like I said, according to your logic, articles like
1125:, a national civil rights lawyer representing the families of
617:
List of school shootings in the United States (before 2000)
1165:
don't have a deadline to have an article about something
2084:
article as a perfectly good place for the information.
1825:
1378:
1370:
153:
149:
145:
209:
1804:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms
727:
per similar articles on officer-involved shootings.
987:
dead student's family has already hired an attorney
681:
as per nom, since the school itself has an article.
1445:highest profile lawyer for these types of cases,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2159:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1766:aspect, not from the high number of fatalities.
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:Note: This discussion has been included in the
248:Note: This discussion has been included in the
1327:an argument to be had about events that can be
265:list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions
1794:. Regardless, I will again make reference to
1746:was a single fatality event, and yet we have
1198:right now and in light of the involvement of
581:List of school shootings in the United States
223:
8:
299:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
1619:Not sure how to do that personally, sorry.
506:There were shootings in Nebraska that were
282:list of Events-related deletion discussions
1485:
296:
279:
262:
250:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
247:
1194:way around. Given what is happening with
120:Austin-East Magnet High School shooting
72:Austin-East Magnet High School shooting
1196:2020–2021 United States racial unrest
7:
1377:that articles about mass shootings (
601:but currently do not have articles.
721:The latest police press conference
481:Millard South High School shooting
24:
1379:which this article started out as
1657:to the high school's article or
96:Introduction to deletion process
1535:It seems like you need to read
1458:, and even international media
1301:IDONTLIKEIT kind of arguments.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
510:deadlier than that one, e.g.
1254:You are misinterpreting the
1223:, this flies in the face of
1121:about the case reports that
774:. This is a massive case of
448:coverage has ceased or not.
1366:Indianapolis FedEx shooting
1264:Indianapolis FedEx shooting
1187:Indianapolis FedEx shooting
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
2176:
2128:01:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
2074:14:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
2046:14:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
2031:14:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
2011:13:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1982:11:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1937:04:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1919:04:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1888:04:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1868:17:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1854:17:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1837:10:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1819:09:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1776:09:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1722:04:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1692:15:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
1671:23:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1629:02:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
1615:11:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1601:11:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1586:10:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1567:07:43, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1549:06:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1531:05:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1517:05:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1505:don't bludgeon the process
1480:04:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1422:22:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1346:20:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1311:04:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1296:04:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1281:04:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1246:02:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1225:our "no deadline" guidance
1216:01:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1177:01:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1145:01:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
1106:19:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
1071:18:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
1042:12:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
1023:07:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
1008:13:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
978:12:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
930:10:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
915:10:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
900:10:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
885:09:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
841:07:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
823:02:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
806:18:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
788:06:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
755:01:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
737:00:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
712:00:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
691:00:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
670:00:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
637:00:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
611:00:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
593:00:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
575:00:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
546:00:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
528:00:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
502:00:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
488:00:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
476:00:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
458:23:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
436:23:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
415:22:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
390:22:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
376:22:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
346:00:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
328:21:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
308:21:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
291:21:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
274:21:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
257:21:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
242:21:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
66:14:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
1661:. NOTNEWS, TOOSOON, etc.
2149:Please do not modify it.
1752:Killing of Daunte Wright
1406:Killing of Daunte Wright
556:WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST
32:Please do not modify it.
1680:Austin-East High School
1059:Austin-East High School
768:Austin-East High School
700:Austin-East High School
679:Austin-East High School
512:Westroads Mall shooting
399:Austin-East High School
235:Austin-East High School
54:Austin-East High School
2079:criminal acts there's
1756:Daunte Wright protests
1707:September 11th attacks
1375:another AfD discussion
865:Daunte Wright protests
875:is likely to be met.
869:Derek Chauvin's trial
84:Articles for deletion
516:Charles Starkweather
397:- Keep, or merge to
1758:. Just like in the
1750:articles about it,
1461:. Today's NYT story
1371:I made the argument
1159:says (explained by
357:Knowledge is not a
1163:) - which says we
1742:. The killing of
1650:
1649:
1501:Assume good faith
1455:, Huffington Post
1387:comment added by
798:John Pack Lambert
532:According to the
310:
293:
276:
259:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
2167:
2036:pretty obvious.
1789:
1783:
1736:
1486:
1400:
1364:
483:comes to mind.
373:
365:
305:
288:
271:
228:
227:
213:
161:
143:
81:
34:
2175:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2157:deletion review
1787:
1781:
1730:
1651:
1491:
1382:
1358:
1119:Huffington Post
369:
363:
303:
286:
269:
170:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2173:
2171:
2162:
2161:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1940:
1939:
1921:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1875:WP:BLUDGEONing
1792:WP:BLUDGEONing
1764:racial justice
1725:
1724:
1695:
1694:
1673:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1551:
1493:
1492:
1490:Heated content
1489:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1260:WP:CRYSTALBALL
1249:
1248:
1180:
1179:
1147:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1085:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1074:
1073:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
981:
980:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
826:
825:
808:
790:
760:
759:
758:
757:
740:
739:
714:
693:
672:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
621:mass shootings
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
530:
461:
460:
441:
440:
439:
438:
418:
417:
395:Keep or merge
392:
378:
351:
350:
349:
348:
331:
330:
312:
311:
294:
277:
260:
231:
230:
167:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2172:
2160:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2145:
2144:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2087:
2086:WP:INVALIDBIO
2082:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2060:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2017:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2008:
2004:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1846:
1845:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1817:
1816:
1811:
1810:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1786:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:Daunte Wright
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1744:Daunte Wright
1741:
1734:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1714:
1713:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1697:
1696:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1652:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:Love of Corey
1618:
1617:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:Love of Corey
1538:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1460:
1457:
1454:
1451:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1389:Love of Corey
1386:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:Daunte Wright
1201:
1197:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1131:Daunte Wright
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1052:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
984:
983:
982:
979:
976:
975:
974:
970:
969:
968:
963:
962:
957:
952:
948:
945:
944:
931:
927:
923:
918:
917:
916:
912:
908:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
888:
887:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
859:
856:
853:
850:
847:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
829:
828:
827:
824:
820:
816:
812:
809:
807:
803:
799:
794:
791:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
762:
761:
756:
752:
748:
747:Love of Corey
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
734:
730:
729:Love of Corey
726:
722:
718:
715:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
694:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
671:
667:
663:
662:Love of Corey
659:
655:
652:
651:
638:
634:
630:
629:Love of Corey
626:
622:
618:
615:There's also
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
585:Love of Corey
582:
578:
577:
576:
572:
568:
564:
561:
557:
553:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:cited article
531:
529:
525:
521:
520:Love of Corey
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
486:
482:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
468:Love of Corey
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
455:
451:
446:
443:
442:
437:
433:
429:
425:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
391:
388:
387:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
366:
360:
356:
353:
352:
347:
343:
339:
338:Love of Corey
335:
334:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
309:
306:
300:
295:
292:
289:
283:
278:
275:
272:
266:
261:
258:
255:
251:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2148:
2146:
1969:and NBC News
1960:, USA Today
1923:
1911:DocFreeman24
1906:
1848:
1842:
1813:
1807:
1747:
1716:
1710:
1702:
1698:
1675:
1658:
1654:
1442:
1434:
1383:— Preceding
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1268:
1200:George Floyd
1161:WP:RECENTISM
1153:
1149:
1127:George Floyd
1114:
1054:
1030:WP:DUEWEIGHT
973:
972:
966:
964:
960:
946:
873:WP:SUSTAINED
810:
792:
771:
763:
724:
716:
695:
674:
653:
507:
444:
423:
394:
385:
380:
370:
354:
315:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1684:Magnolia677
1555:WP:BLUDGEON
1537:WP:BLUDGEON
579:Please see
197:free images
1954:, NBC News
1824:themselves
1796:WP:NOTNEWS
1703:ipso facto
1663:Shearonink
1452:, Newsweek
1256:WP:NOTNEWS
1191:WP:NOTNEWS
1157:WP:NOTNEWS
1083:is a pure
956:WP:TOOSOON
951:WP:NOTNEWS
815:XavierItzm
658:WP:NOTNEWS
625:WP:NOTNEWS
320:Inexpiable
58:Randykitty
2153:talk page
2081:WP:VICTIM
2056:Knox News
1963:, NY Post
1800:WP:RECENT
1574:Ben Crump
1447:Ben Crump
1123:Ben Crump
1063:KnaveBear
961:WikiVirus
857:, NBCNews
796:articles.
776:WP:TOSOON
704:Funcrunch
538:Funcrunch
359:newspaper
304:Spiderone
287:Spiderone
270:Spiderone
37:talk page
2155:or in a
2120:Adamant1
2038:Adamant1
2003:Adamant1
1929:Adamant1
1880:Adamant1
1785:collapse
1593:Adamant1
1559:Adamant1
1509:Adamant1
1397:contribs
1385:unsigned
1373:over at
1329:presumed
1288:Adamant1
1015:Adamant1
996:WP:EVENT
922:Adamant1
892:Adamant1
833:Adamant1
780:Adamant1
683:Ingratis
599:WP:EVENT
560:WP:EVENT
514:and the
485:–DMartin
428:Jax 0677
424:Comment
407:Jax 0677
403:WP:CHEAP
254:–DMartin
239:–DMartin
164:View log
105:glossary
39:or in a
1924:Comment
1435:Comment
1342:say hi!
1317:routine
1242:say hi!
1173:say hi!
1115:Comment
717:Comment
203:WP refs
191:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
1948:, WaPo
1802:, and
1659:Delete
1269:always
1154:policy
992:WP:GNG
851:, WaPo
772:Delete
725:rename
654:Delete
355:Delete
175:Google
141:delete
2066:Nsk92
2058:today
2023:Nsk92
1974:Nsk92
1957:, AjC
1951:, NYT
1860:Nsk92
1829:Nsk92
1768:Nsk92
1740:WP:RS
1699:Merge
1676:Merge
1655:Merge
1607:Nsk92
1578:Nsk92
1523:Nsk92
1472:Nsk92
1467:WP:RS
1439:WP:RS
1414:Nsk92
1410:WP:RS
1361:Nsk92
1321:other
1303:Nsk92
1273:Nsk92
1221:Nsk92
1208:Nsk92
1150:Merge
1137:Nsk92
1098:Nsk92
1081:WP:RS
1055:Merge
1034:Nsk92
1000:Nsk92
947:Merge
907:Nsk92
877:Nsk92
854:, AjC
848:, CNN
793:Merge
764:Merge
696:Merge
675:Merge
603:Nsk92
567:Nsk92
494:Nsk92
450:Nsk92
371:SPEAK
364:KidAd
237:page
218:JSTOR
179:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
50:merge
16:<
2124:talk
2070:talk
2042:talk
2027:talk
2007:talk
1978:talk
1933:talk
1915:talk
1907:Keep
1884:talk
1864:talk
1833:talk
1772:talk
1754:and
1733:JPxG
1688:talk
1667:talk
1625:talk
1611:talk
1597:talk
1582:talk
1563:talk
1557:. --
1545:talk
1527:talk
1513:talk
1503:and
1476:talk
1418:talk
1393:talk
1338:User
1307:talk
1292:talk
1277:talk
1258:and
1238:User
1212:talk
1202:and
1169:User
1141:talk
1129:and
1102:talk
1067:talk
1038:talk
1019:talk
1004:talk
994:and
926:talk
911:talk
896:talk
881:talk
837:talk
819:talk
811:Keep
802:talk
784:talk
751:talk
733:talk
708:talk
687:talk
666:talk
656:per
633:talk
607:talk
589:talk
571:talk
542:talk
524:talk
498:talk
472:talk
454:talk
445:Keep
432:talk
411:talk
405:. --
401:per
386:{ }
381:Keep
342:talk
324:talk
316:Keep
211:FENS
185:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
62:talk
2021:.
1748:two
1678:to
1443:the
1057:to
770:or
766:to
698:to
677:to
508:way
225:TWL
162:– (
52:to
2126:)
2072:)
2064:.
2044:)
2029:)
2009:)
1980:)
1972:.
1935:)
1917:)
1886:)
1878:--
1866:)
1844:jp
1835:)
1809:jp
1806:.
1798:,
1788:}}
1782:{{
1774:)
1712:jp
1690:)
1682:.
1669:)
1627:)
1613:)
1599:)
1584:)
1565:)
1547:)
1529:)
1515:)
1507:.
1478:)
1420:)
1399:)
1395:•
1344:)
1325:is
1309:)
1294:)
1279:)
1244:)
1214:)
1175:)
1143:)
1104:)
1096:.
1069:)
1040:)
1021:)
1006:)
998:.
958:.
928:)
913:)
898:)
883:)
867:,
839:)
821:)
804:)
786:)
753:)
735:)
719:-
710:)
689:)
668:)
660:.
635:)
627:.
609:)
591:)
573:)
565:.
544:)
526:)
500:)
474:)
456:)
434:)
413:)
367:•
344:)
326:)
301:.
284:.
267:.
252:.
205:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
64:)
56:.
2122:(
2068:(
2040:(
2025:(
2005:(
1976:(
1931:(
1913:(
1882:(
1862:(
1850:g
1847:×
1831:(
1815:g
1812:×
1770:(
1735::
1731:@
1718:g
1715:×
1686:(
1665:(
1623:(
1609:(
1595:(
1580:(
1561:(
1543:(
1525:(
1511:(
1474:(
1416:(
1391:(
1363::
1359:@
1340:/
1305:(
1290:(
1275:(
1240:/
1210:(
1171:/
1139:(
1100:(
1091:,
1065:(
1036:(
1017:(
1002:(
967:C
924:(
909:(
894:(
879:(
835:(
817:(
800:(
782:(
749:(
731:(
706:(
685:(
664:(
631:(
605:(
587:(
569:(
540:(
522:(
496:(
470:(
452:(
430:(
409:(
340:(
322:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.