518:
per Bubba73. Even a member of the Chess
Project and an avid chessplayer like me finds this article ridiculously non-notable. Of course this is a case-by-case assessment: if some notable chess openings were "AFDed" I would argue to keep them. But this article is definitely not one of them, by any
474:. This is one of a series of minor sub-variations which was probably created by mistake, and with weak Geocities sourcing which does nothing beyond defining the moves. Entering the moves in
401:
Although I see your point, a lot of these are actually pretty factual and merit their own article. This opening is fairly uncommon and is probably copied from an encyclopedia or something.
115:
248:
Some chess openings can be considered notable if they're fairly common (jiaco piano) or if its an open commonly played by a grandmaster like
Fischer or Kasparov. -
264:. I only put this one up for deletion because this is the only one I found at this moment. When I find others, I'll put them on the chopping block as well.
372:
88:
83:
92:
444:
We in the Chess
Project have already dealt with a large number of similar articles, and this one is too small to merit its own article.
371:
I am uncertain how to vote, because this seems to be opening a large and complex issue. If this is deleted, then much of the content on
75:
17:
426:
354:: I don't see how this is notable. Obviously the game itself is, but I guess this is supposed to be "inherent notability"? -
388:
172:
567:
36:
481:, and performing a search, reveals just one hit. (Which is not surprising since the move 5.h4 looks like a horrible
187:
Most of the other articles we have on openings are well-covered in literature. Several chess openings have lots of
547:
158:
566:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
552:
523:
510:
494:
466:
452:
435:
405:
363:
336:
323:
288:
268:
252:
236:
213:
200:
182:
162:
131:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79:
146:
376:
312:
419:
209:
That's what I didn't know. It sounds from the comments further down as though this is at the least nn.
71:
63:
333:
285:
249:
387:
to a more suitable place. Although, it looks like a lot of this content is already duplicated by the
489:
195:
176:
143:
not clear to me this is any less notable than any of the many other chess opening/defense pages.
53:
227:: Just curious here, but why did the nom only nominate this one, since there are many others? -
541:
448:
359:
319:
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
414:
380:
482:
127:
532:
486:
192:
461:
154:
49:
536:
445:
355:
316:
228:
109:
503:
402:
265:
123:
280:, With all do respect a lot of chess openings are much more notable than say
475:
520:
281:
210:
150:
122:
This stub lists an uncommon chess opening that does not require listing.
460:
per Bubba73. I think the Chess
Wikiproject knows what they are doing.--
560:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
479:
105:
101:
97:
191:
written about them. This article is not one of them.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
570:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:looks like it's in trouble, along with perhaps
311:There are a lot of notable chess openings, see
8:
478:database, a collection of 4.2 million games
373:List of chess openings named after places
383:, but I think this content is better
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
485:which just drops the knight on f3.)
24:
315:. But this one is not notable.
389:Encyclopedia of Chess Openings
1:
511:08:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
495:07:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
467:05:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
453:05:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
436:05:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
406:23:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
364:04:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
269:23:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
253:19:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
237:04:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
214:15:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
201:07:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
183:04:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
163:03:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
132:03:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
553:11:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
524:18:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
337:14:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
324:20:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
289:20:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
58:08:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
587:
563:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
377:List of chess openings
313:List of chess openings
379:. Knowledge (XXG) is
381:not a strategy guide
332:Thanks, I'm aware. -
173:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
391:on their own site.
550:
544:
492:
198:
165:
149:comment added by
72:Australian Gambit
64:Australian Gambit
578:
565:
546:
540:
508:
490:
464:
431:
422:
417:
196:
179:
178:Ten Pound Hammer
144:
113:
95:
34:
586:
585:
581:
580:
579:
577:
576:
575:
574:
568:deletion review
561:
504:
502:per Bubba73 --
462:
434:
427:
420:
415:
177:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
584:
582:
573:
572:
556:
555:
526:
513:
497:
469:
455:
424:
411:
410:
409:
408:
393:
392:
366:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
272:
271:
256:
255:
240:
239:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
204:
203:
185:
167:
166:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
583:
571:
569:
564:
558:
557:
554:
549:
543:
538:
534:
533:King's Gambit
530:
527:
525:
522:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
501:
498:
496:
493:
488:
484:
480:
477:
473:
470:
468:
465:
459:
456:
454:
450:
447:
443:
440:
439:
438:
437:
432:
430:
423:
418:
407:
404:
400:
397:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
338:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
290:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
267:
263:
260:
259:
258:
257:
254:
251:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
215:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
199:
194:
190:
186:
184:
180:
174:
171:
170:
169:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
142:
140:
136:
135:
134:
133:
129:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
562:
559:
528:
515:
505:
499:
471:
457:
441:
428:
412:
398:
384:
368:
351:
329:
308:
277:
261:
245:
224:
188:
138:
137:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
385:transwikied
334:RiverHockey
286:RiverHockey
250:RiverHockey
145:—Preceding
519:criteria.
487:Sjakkalle
476:ChessBase
193:Sjakkalle
491:(Check!)
463:Lenticel
429:contribs
282:Chess960
197:(Check!)
159:contribs
147:unsigned
116:View log
50:Davewild
537:ZeroOne
483:blunder
446:Bubba73
421:Penguin
399:Comment
369:Comment
356:Rjd0060
330:Comment
317:Bubba73
309:Comment
278:Comment
262:Comment
246:Comment
229:Rjd0060
225:Comment
141:Neutral
89:protect
84:history
516:Delete
506:ÂżAmaráź›
500:Delete
472:Delete
458:Delete
449:(talk)
442:Delete
352:Delete
320:(talk)
93:delete
46:Delete
531:into
529:Merge
403:Tavix
266:Tavix
189:books
124:Tavix
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
542:talk
416:Nick
360:talk
233:talk
155:talk
139:Keep
128:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
535:. —
521:SyG
284:. -
211:JJL
181:•
151:JJL
114:– (
551:)
545:/
451:,
413:--
362:)
322:,
307:*
235:)
175:.
161:)
157:•
130:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
548:@
539:(
433:)
425:(
358:(
328:*
231:(
153:(
126:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.