422:- A substantial part of a significant exhibition. I quote from WP article: "The next year she completed a 10-hour endurance based, citywide performance and 100 person performative dinner party in the Barnes Foundation museum as part of "A Person of the Crowd" which was a major performance art survey featuring Marina Abramovic, Tania Bruguera, and William Pope L., among others." The Barnes Foundation is considered a significant art institution located in Philadelphia. It was founded by Albert Coombs Barnes (1872 – 1951) who, at the time, was avant-garde and a friend of the black community by inviting students of Lincoln University with a black president to collaborate, providing further context for the historical importance of Evan's large scale performance project. However, that is a side-note. In addition other notable venues that have shown Evan's work includes Museo Del Barrio, and Queens Museum.
597:'s interpretation of the notability criteria in relation to this subject. For example, I don't agree that someone who is an associate professor and mentioned in one textbook meets the criteria of "important in their field/widely cited by peers". I also don't agree that the catsuit is a "significant new concept", given that it's only recognisable in Chelsea, NY (as per the explanation above). I don't agree that participation in the Barnes Foundation event qualifies for criteria 4 (how many performers were involved? Was her contribution significant?). Matriarch-info has also added information above which doesn't relate to the WP criteria for notability e.g. that there are several editors working on this article (not measured towards a person's notability); that she is a member of under-represented groups (also not measured towards a person's notability).
386:. Taylor & Francis. The signature catsuit has also from time to time had considerable street credibility and recognition in Chelsea, NY. Performance is not a new phenomenon nor is street performance or participataory performance, but Evan's queer-friendly, feminist, and camp style that merges high and low, incorporating black visual culture in traditionally white spaces, including the public space, and her visual language is unique and something that has begun to be appropriated by other artists through her teaching and the dissemination of her practice.
382:- Signature Public Guerrilla style, technique. "I Just Came Here to Find a New Husband"-series gained popularity and recognition within the art world and the mainstream - see press coverage. This project was also widely recognized in the black music community for a time. In addition, Evans is praised for her public Guerrila style work - encompassing "I Just Came Here to Find Husband," but also the use of her signature catsuit including but not limited to "Operation Catsuit" - as mentioned in the New York Times article and
612:
independent, reliable sources. What that practically means to me is that if I were to start the article from scratch, using only the information provided by those sources used now that are by consensus considered independent and reliable, I'd be able to write an article that comprehensively covers the subject. I support
320:
there is sufficient critical commentary or analysis in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources. A bit buried in all the primary sources and interviews perhaps, but it's there. I can only get Re-envisioning the contemporary art canon through an inter-library loan, so I have not yet checked
451:
who reviewed the article once it was developed from its insufficient form and the user on the chat that helped me get the article to that point. In addition, I noticed that an image has been added from another user. To me this proves that there are many users who are working to keep this article
443:
On
Knowledge there is a lack of representation of African American artists, female artists, and performance artists - these individuals and groups are also marginalized beyond the Knowledge sphere - in addition to being notable and recognized in the art world and the mainstream, the artist falls
611:
I agree with the objections that MurielMay raises against claims of notabilty. Those claims are either not supported by policy at all, or idiosyncratic interpretations of policy. Having said that, after reading all the sources I was able to access, I find that there is significant coverage in
425:
It should be noted that Evan's is primarily a performance artist meaning that she has little physical work, nor does she have gallery representation. However, this is the case for many prominent performance and social practice based artists and should not constitute a reason to lessen her
371:. Taylor & Francis). These source examples (recognition from notable non-profit/grant-giving body, mainstream press, and employment) show that the artist is widely notable within the art world - as a practitioner but also as an educator teaching the next generation - and beyond.
413:
4. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or
494:
Vexations, when I run it through a plagiarism checker it only caught on to the
Knowledge articles and the quotes which are cited. Please give some indication to which parts are copy-pasted as I think you are incorrect and may be referring to the quotes.
401:
In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or
409:- Independent reviews include New York Times, Hyperallergic, MadameNoire, NY Art Beat, AP Press, and the WP aricle lists many more (this is in addition to passing mentions in major art publication artnet and a number of blogazines)
208:
639:"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."
479:
The problem with this article is not that the subject is not notable, but that much of the article has been copy/pasted from copyrighted sources. That material MUST be removed and possibly revdel'd.
536:
514:
169:
254:
Draft was declined by two AfC reviewers then improved and moved to main article space. Still insufficient evidence that subject meets the notability criteria for an artist.
202:
537:
https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Ayana+Evans&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0
515:
https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=999395377&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1
116:
101:
367:- See Franklin Furnace Award, New York Times feature article, Professorship at Brown University, and the inclusion in an art history text book. (
337:
Thanks for clarifying, the article sufficiently meets the requirements on notability strengthened by reliable sources. See rundown of
444:
within these three categories of marginalized groups that we must give the representation and recognition that they deserve.
142:
137:
96:
89:
17:
455:
For its clear notability and the issue of representation I urge the community to do all they can for this article to remain.
146:
390:
3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.
282:
223:
190:
129:
110:
106:
66:
667:
513:, the version I compared is a little older than the current one. This report should give the same results I got:
40:
349:
Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:
543:
500:
469:
184:
663:
180:
36:
650:
625:
606:
583:
547:
525:
504:
488:
473:
330:
308:
288:
263:
248:
71:
602:
304:
259:
244:
621:
594:
539:
521:
510:
496:
484:
465:
326:
278:
230:
216:
561:
338:
645:
579:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
662:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
574:
article and other hefty sources in this article. It needs clean-up, but AFD isn't for that.
565:
557:
133:
360:
1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
636:
598:
459:
342:
300:
255:
240:
62:
196:
635:
I randomly looked at a few of the references (i.e. NYTimes.com), and they seem to meet
617:
570:
532:
517:
480:
375:
2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
322:
274:
297:
640:
575:
448:
437:- Critical attention, as proved by awards, fellowships, articles, and exhibitions.
427:
293:
285:
163:
125:
77:
53:
298:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals
384:
Re-envisioning the
Contemporary Art Canon: Perspectives in a Global World
369:
Re-envisioning the
Contemporary Art Canon: Perspectives in a Global World
296:
which of the criteria listed at the link below does the subject meet?
430:
who currently does not have a gallery but is leading in the field.
397:- "Operation Catsuit" and "I Just Came Here to Find a Husband"
658:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
159:
155:
151:
215:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
670:). No further edits should be made to this page.
229:
8:
281:, convince me that this article is notable.
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
321:that, but it looks like a reliable source.
7:
535:All amended. That was very helpful.
273:The references and text, as well as
24:
447:I appreciate the dedication from
102:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
651:16:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
626:22:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
607:11:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
584:22:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
548:00:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
526:13:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
505:00:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
489:13:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
474:00:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
331:12:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
309:18:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
289:11:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
264:07:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
249:07:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
72:21:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
687:
660:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
458:What is your response
426:credibility. See also
593:- I don't agree with
568:. There is already a
90:Articles for deletion
341:checklist below: ::
239:non-notable artist
649:
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
678:
643:
234:
233:
219:
167:
149:
87:
58:
34:
686:
685:
681:
680:
679:
677:
676:
675:
674:
668:deletion review
176:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
70:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
684:
682:
673:
672:
654:
653:
630:
629:
628:
595:Matriarch-info
587:
586:
571:New York Times
556:- another per
540:Matriarch-info
529:
528:
511:Matriarch-info
497:Matriarch-info
492:
491:
466:Matriarch-info
452:published.
334:
333:
314:
313:
312:
311:
267:
266:
237:
236:
173:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
683:
671:
669:
665:
661:
656:
655:
652:
647:
642:
638:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
567:
563:
559:
555:
552:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
538:
534:
527:
523:
519:
516:
512:
509:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
461:
456:
453:
450:
445:
442:
441:Editors note:
438:
436:
431:
429:
423:
421:
416:
415:
410:
408:
404:
403:
398:
396:
392:
391:
387:
385:
381:
377:
376:
372:
370:
366:
362:
361:
357:
355:
351:
350:
346:
345:
344:
340:
332:
328:
324:
319:
316:
315:
310:
306:
302:
299:
295:
292:
291:
290:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
659:
657:
632:
613:
590:
569:
553:
530:
493:
464:
457:
454:
446:
440:
439:
434:
432:
428:Suzanne Lacy
424:
419:
417:
412:
411:
406:
405:
400:
399:
394:
393:
389:
388:
383:
379:
378:
374:
373:
368:
364:
363:
359:
358:
353:
352:
348:
347:
336:
335:
317:
279:WP:POTENTIAL
270:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
83:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
562:WP:CREATIVE
339:WP:CREATIVE
203:free images
126:Ayana Evans
78:Ayana Evans
67:revolutions
599:MurielMary
460:MurielMary
343:MurielMary
301:MurielMary
256:MurielMary
241:MurielMary
664:talk page
618:Vexations
566:WP:SIGCOV
558:WP:BEFORE
533:Vexations
518:Vexations
481:Vexations
356:- artist
323:Vexations
37:talk page
666:or in a
637:WP:BASIC
531:Thanks!
414:museums.
402:reviews.
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
641:Jeepday
591:Comment
576:Bearian
449:Chicdat
294:Chicdat
286:Chicdat
275:WP:NBIO
209:WP refs
197:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
63:spin me
564:, and
181:Google
147:delete
224:JSTOR
185:books
164:views
156:watch
152:links
56:78.26
16:<
646:talk
633:Keep
622:talk
614:Keep
603:talk
580:talk
554:Keep
544:talk
522:talk
501:talk
485:talk
470:talk
327:talk
318:Keep
305:talk
277:and
271:Keep
260:talk
245:talk
217:FENS
191:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
50:keep
462:?
435:YES
433:C)
420:YES
418:B)
407:YES
395:YES
380:YES
365:YES
354:YES
231:TWL
168:– (
624:)
616:.
605:)
582:)
560:,
546:)
524:)
503:)
487:)
472:)
329:)
307:)
283:🐔
262:)
247:)
211:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
65:/
52:.
648:)
644:(
620:(
601:(
578:(
542:(
520:(
499:(
483:(
468:(
325:(
303:(
258:(
243:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
69:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.