152:
uses the word "battlecarrier" to describe the Ises or any other hypothetical warship. If the article has no reliable sources to assert the existence and notability of the term, the article should be deleted.
290:, which were called CVB between their completion in 1945 and their redesignation in 1952, were the only ships to carry that designation. However, I don't think they need an additional article on top of
140:
had most of their carriers destroyed, not an attempt to build a hybrid warship which could act as both a battleship and a carrier. The term "battlecarrier" may have been recently popularized by the
310:
113:
198:- agree with the nominator that there's just not enough in terms of reliable sources outside of a few games and fictional references for this to be notable at this time.
170:
242:
294:. Nevertheless, I agree with you that the USN's CVBs were completely different from the fictional "battlecarrier" described in the article.
206:
17:
86:
81:
90:
73:
330:
291:
287:
148:, which includes fictional battlecarriers. Most Google hits on the word are fictional. The most critical point is that
352:
36:
145:
351:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
270:
337:
320:
298:
281:
252:
232:
210:
188:
157:
137:
55:
136:
and they were a desperate attempt to get more flight decks in the most expedient way possible after the
220:, we already have an article on the real ones and the fictional ones have no external notability per
129:
274:
261:(that means keep, but rewrite from scratch). Battle carriers existed, but were nothing like the
229:
203:
77:
52:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
221:
121:
295:
154:
278:
182:
334:
225:
199:
141:
69:
61:
266:
132:, which had their rear turrets removed and replaced with a flight deck. However,
120:
This is a non-notable neologism for a fictional type of ship: a combination of an
107:
317:
249:
125:
176:
345:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
51:
but open to verifiable rewrite/redirect where nessecary. -
103:
99:
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
355:). No further edits should be made to this page.
265:fiction described in the existing article. See
134:no historians refer to them as "battlecarriers",
8:
309:: This debate has been included in the
241:: This debate has been included in the
169:: This debate has been included in the
311:list of Game-related-related deletions
277:regardless of the result of this AfD.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
273:. I will rewrite this article at
171:list of Military-related deletions
24:
259:Raze to the waterline and rebuild
243:list of Japan-related deletions
288:Midway class aircraft carriers
1:
331:Midway class aircraft carrier
128:. The article mentions the
372:
338:15:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
321:03:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
299:03:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
282:00:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
253:09:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
233:04:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
211:20:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
189:18:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
158:18:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
146:Naval Ops: Warship Gunner
56:09:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
348:Please do not modify it.
292:the class article itself
32:Please do not modify it.
271:Naval Historical Center
130:Ise class battleships
333:, per TomTheHand.
150:no reliable source
329:, or redirect to
323:
314:
255:
246:
209:
174:
363:
350:
315:
305:
247:
237:
202:
185:
179:
165:
122:aircraft carrier
111:
93:
48:
34:
371:
370:
366:
365:
364:
362:
361:
360:
359:
353:deletion review
346:
318:John Vandenberg
250:John Vandenberg
183:
177:
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
369:
367:
358:
357:
341:
340:
324:
303:
302:
301:
275:Battle Carrier
256:
235:
214:
213:
192:
191:
163:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
368:
356:
354:
349:
343:
342:
339:
336:
332:
328:
325:
322:
319:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
254:
251:
244:
240:
236:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
212:
208:
205:
201:
197:
194:
193:
190:
186:
180:
172:
168:
164:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
151:
147:
143:
142:Playstation 2
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:Battlecarrier
67:
66:
63:
62:Battlecarrier
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
347:
344:
326:
306:
267:this article
262:
258:
238:
217:
195:
166:
149:
133:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
296:TomTheHand
286:Well, the
279:➥the Epopt
155:TomTheHand
126:battleship
269:from the
335:The Land
263:nonsense
226:Dhartung
200:Tony Fox
114:View log
222:WP:FICT
207:review?
87:protect
82:history
327:Delete
218:Delete
204:(arf!)
196:Delete
175:-- --
124:and a
91:delete
187:: -->
144:game
108:views
100:watch
96:links
49:elete
16:<
307:Note
239:Note
230:Talk
224:. --
184:talk
181:<
178:pb30
167:Note
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
316:--
313:.
248:--
245:.
173:.
138:IJN
112:– (
228:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.