Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Bayesian regret (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

223: 82: 176: 302: 217: 77: 183: 283: 258:, with one paper (by Smith) as the primary reference. Also appears to be an attempt to promote range voting over other voting systems, which would violate 123: 108: 329:
which defines the term on the fly. I gather there is a certain low grade interest in the idea. The article as it stands is pretty poor, though.
149: 144: 153: 435: 418: 397: 373: 338: 314: 294: 275: 61: 136: 103: 96: 17: 326: 238: 205: 266:
and was eligible for speedy deletion. Then some user came along, re-submitted the article, and immediately accepted it. --
117: 113: 382: 452: 199: 40: 361: 271: 254:
Page appears to be largely unchanged from the version that was deleted in 2006. Appears to be a clear case of
195: 448: 407:
sufficient use in the scientific literature. (a merge is possible, but should be discussed separately).
393: 369: 36: 245: 140: 267: 231: 262:. I am confused as to why this article was created in the first place - it was declined through 431: 287: 92: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
447:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
211: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
365: 334: 57: 356:. However, the topic may better be covered as part of another broader article for example 132: 67: 310: 259: 414: 357: 263: 427: 255: 170: 353: 330: 53: 325:
GScholar gives a hundred-forty-odd hits over a variety of fields, including
306: 409: 443:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
385:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
352:
term seems to be used in academic literature, for example
166: 162: 158: 230: 83:
Articles for deletion/Bayesian regret (2nd nomination)
391:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 455:). No further edits should be made to this page. 303:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions 301:Note: This discussion has been included in the 282:Note: This discussion has been included in the 354:Dynamic portfolio choice with Bayesian regret 244: 8: 124:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 300: 284:list of Games-related deletion discussions 281: 75: 364:. Finally, article could be improved. 78:Articles for deletion/Bayesian regret 7: 74: 24: 109:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 436:01:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC) 419:01:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC) 398:00:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) 374:11:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC) 62:07:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 1: 339:20:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC) 315:19:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC) 295:18:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC) 276:18:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC) 99:(AfD)? Read these primers! 472: 445:Please do not modify it. 362:Regret (decision theory) 32:Please do not modify it. 73:AfDs for this article: 97:Articles for deletion 400: 317: 297: 114:Guide to deletion 104:How to contribute 463: 396: 390: 388: 386: 292: 249: 248: 234: 186: 174: 156: 94: 34: 471: 470: 466: 465: 464: 462: 461: 460: 459: 453:deletion review 401: 392: 381: 379: 288: 191: 182: 147: 133:Bayesian regret 131: 128: 91: 88: 71: 68:Bayesian regret 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 469: 467: 458: 457: 439: 438: 421: 389: 378: 377: 376: 342: 341: 319: 318: 298: 268:Oneforfortytwo 252: 251: 188: 127: 126: 121: 111: 106: 89: 87: 86: 85: 80: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 468: 456: 454: 450: 446: 441: 440: 437: 433: 429: 425: 422: 420: 416: 412: 411: 406: 403: 402: 399: 395: 394:North America 387: 384: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358:Loss function 355: 351: 347: 344: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 321: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 299: 296: 293: 291: 285: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 247: 243: 240: 237: 233: 229: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 197: 194: 193:Find sources: 189: 185: 181: 178: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 151: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 129: 125: 122: 119: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 101: 100: 98: 93: 84: 81: 79: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 444: 442: 423: 408: 404: 380: 349: 345: 322: 290:CAPTAIN RAJU 289: 253: 241: 235: 227: 220: 214: 208: 202: 192: 179: 90: 49: 47: 31: 28: 366:Jonpatterns 218:free images 426:per DGG.-- 327:this paper 449:talk page 37:talk page 451:or in a 383:Relisted 177:View log 118:glossary 39:or in a 428:Doncram 323:comment 260:WP:NPOV 224:WP refs 212:scholar 150:protect 145:history 95:New to 331:Mangoe 264:WP:AFC 196:Google 154:delete 54:Michig 415:talk 405:Keep. 350:Merge 256:WP:OR 239:JSTOR 200:books 184:Stats 171:views 163:watch 159:links 16:< 432:talk 424:Keep 370:talk 360:or 346:Keep 335:talk 311:talk 307:Izno 272:talk 232:FENS 206:news 167:logs 141:talk 137:edit 58:talk 50:keep 410:DGG 348:or 246:TWL 175:– ( 434:) 417:) 372:) 337:) 313:) 305:. 286:. 274:) 226:) 169:| 165:| 161:| 157:| 152:| 148:| 143:| 139:| 60:) 52:. 430:( 413:( 368:( 333:( 309:( 270:( 250:) 242:· 236:· 228:· 221:· 215:· 209:· 203:· 198:( 190:( 187:) 180:· 173:) 135:( 120:) 116:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Michig
talk
07:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Bayesian regret
Articles for deletion/Bayesian regret
Articles for deletion/Bayesian regret (2nd nomination)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Bayesian regret
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.