387:"Settlement" is not our basis for automatic notability, as you note "legally recognized" is, and "if it was a separate legally recognized place" does not have basis. This includes incorporation as a place with local government, or details about population in a census, or otherwise having defined borders, but not merely being a named neighborhood, about which nothing beyond existence is known. Still, we have no policies mandating separate articles for such places that can be covered in another article, just like the many communities that have been annexed into recognized cities and towns in the US, for example.
324:"By the same decree the following administrative/territorial changed have been made: The settlements of town type of Bagbanlar , Krasnoye Selo , and Oktyabr ' have been included in the boundaries of the town of Kirovabad", having existed as 'settlement of town type' prior to merger with Ganja/Kirovabad this would be sufficient for keeping an article in line with
434:
seems to have quite a lot of in-depth history of this place, at least stemming back to 16th century, but someone with better
Turkish language skills could make more out of it. My understanding is that the Bagbanlar (plural of 'Baghban') PGT would have been formed out of the two areas described in the
193:
372:
the merger into Ganja, it merits a separate article. Notability in
Knowledge isn't temporary, if it was a separate legally recognized place prior to merger into a larger municipality it warrants a separate article.
294:- located at 40.39 N, 46.19 E. Looking at google maps, there is indeed an area with a 'Banbaglar Mosque' in the south western portions of Ganja. The other 'Bagbanlar' in that document is clearly
154:
187:
435:
book, the I 'Bala Bağban' (small
Baghban, 'garden', old merchant area, with wineyards in 16th century?) and the 'Büyük Bağban' (large Baghban, rural area south of Ganja)
261:
241:
101:
325:
86:
224:
This should be deleted, because there is no indication on any other source that this place exists, and it is likely not notable even if it did exist.
470:'s research. I can't access those excerpts but I'm happy to try to track down native speakers to decipher them if someone can grab them.--
127:
122:
131:
114:
208:
175:
81:
74:
17:
355:, but rather it's a neighborhood within the legally recognized Ganja. We have nothing else to say about it beyond existence.
408:
was formed in 1946, i.e. a formal administrative territorial unit. This PGT was then merged with
Kirovabad in 1963. --
95:
91:
328:"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low" --
169:
523:
492:
40:
165:
506:
479:
458:
417:
391:
382:
359:
337:
307:
273:
253:
233:
56:
502:
436:
215:
519:
405:
118:
36:
295:
201:
496:
181:
449:
describes the two localities as
Turkish areas (in the context of Armenian-Turkish conflict). --
346:
287:
269:
249:
229:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
518:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
110:
62:
454:
413:
378:
333:
303:
289:
U.S.S.R.: Official
Standard Names Approved by the United States Board on Geographic Names
472:
388:
356:
265:
245:
225:
53:
148:
442:
427:
397:
317:
488:
467:
450:
409:
374:
329:
299:
437:
http://www.gancapost.info/g-nc-nin-bala-bagban-m-h-ll-si-tarix-h1289.htm
349:, we should too. The source above established that this is in fact
399:
Azerbaĭdzhanskai︠a︡ SSR: administrativno-territorialʹnoe delenie
514:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
284:- Bagbanlar is listed as a 'Section of a Populated Place' in
144:
140:
136:
432:. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı. 1998. pp. 108–115.
200:
286:United States. Geographic Names Division (1970).
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
526:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:Note: This discussion has been included in the
240:Note: This discussion has been included in the
262:list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions
242:list of Geography-related deletion discussions
402:. Azerbaĭdzhanskoe gos. izd-vo. 1961. p. 145.
214:
8:
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
326:Knowledge:Notability (geographic features)
259:
239:
345:If the small settlement was merged into
322:. Central Asian Research Centre. 1963.
444:Azerbaycan istiklâl mücadelesi tarihi
7:
447:. Azerbaycan Halk Yayınları. p. 11.
24:
491:'s findings and we should avoid
87:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
439:has some history on the area.
368:, if it was a town settlement
1:
404:clarifies that the Bagbanlar
507:20:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
480:12:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
459:23:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
418:22:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
392:20:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
383:10:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
360:21:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
338:12:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
308:12:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
274:11:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
254:11:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
234:11:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
57:21:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
353:a "legally recognized place
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
543:
429:Türk dünyası araştırmaları
516:Please do not modify it.
441:Hüseyin Baykara (1975).
32:Please do not modify it.
292:. The Division. p. 276.
75:Articles for deletion
319:Central Asian Review
495:in such cases. --
478:
347:Ganja, Azerbaijan
276:
256:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
534:
499:
477:
448:
433:
403:
323:
296:Bağbanlar, Agdam
293:
219:
218:
204:
152:
134:
111:Bagbanlar, Ganja
72:
63:Bagbanlar, Ganja
34:
542:
541:
537:
536:
535:
533:
532:
531:
530:
524:deletion review
497:
493:systematic bias
440:
426:
396:
316:
285:
161:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
540:
538:
529:
528:
510:
509:
482:
461:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
363:
340:
310:
278:
277:
257:
222:
221:
158:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
539:
527:
525:
521:
517:
512:
511:
508:
504:
500:
494:
490:
486:
483:
481:
475:
474:
469:
465:
462:
460:
456:
452:
446:
445:
438:
431:
430:
425:
419:
415:
411:
407:
401:
400:
395:
394:
393:
390:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
371:
367:
364:
362:
361:
358:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
321:
320:
314:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
291:
290:
283:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
515:
513:
484:
471:
463:
443:
428:
398:
369:
365:
354:
350:
342:
318:
312:
288:
281:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
188:free images
498:KartikeyaS
520:talk page
466:based on
37:talk page
522:or in a
473:Milowent
389:Reywas92
357:Reywas92
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
366:Comment
282:Comment
266:Techie3
246:Techie3
226:Techie3
194:WP refs
182:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
370:before
315:- See
166:Google
132:delete
489:Soman
468:Soman
451:Soman
410:Soman
375:Soman
343:Merge
330:Soman
300:Soman
209:JSTOR
170:books
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
503:talk
487:per
485:Keep
464:Keep
455:talk
414:talk
379:talk
334:talk
313:Keep
304:talk
298:. --
270:talk
250:talk
230:talk
202:FENS
176:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
50:keep
406:PGT
351:not
216:TWL
153:– (
505:)
476:•
457:)
416:)
381:)
373:--
336:)
306:)
272:)
264:.
252:)
244:.
232:)
196:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
52:.
501:(
453:(
412:(
377:(
332:(
302:(
268:(
248:(
228:(
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.