Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Bankruptcy problem - Knowledge

Source 📝

418:
This is not distinguishing between "the bankruptcy problem" and "a bankruptcy problem", which would be a class of problems and quite possibly a subclass of bargaining problems, as I pointed out earlier. Note that in the survey article, it refers to them as "bankruptcy problems". I don't particularly
342:
It does very much sound like a typical problem in game theory. There seem to be enough articles to initially doubt the assertion of non-notability. In my opinion, it does not at all read as original research. In fact, it may well suffer from the opposite problem of being too close to a existing
382:
gets about 1,090 GScholar hits. There are more than enough sources to make this a notable topic and on which to base an article. The article itself seems fine as a stub, but of course could be improved. I'll note that
163: 321:
My first impression is to doubt that this is original research. As for the notice at the game theore wikiproject, it looks as if maybe somebody looks at that page at least once every twenty years.
322: 429:, because I think that someone who has already heard of this before (and they should be out there, if this is notable) should have a sense of how it fits into the larger literature. 234: 157: 116: 214: 387:
is on the more general topic, but discusses the game-theoretic aspects, too. A notable topic and an article with no major problems suggests keeping the article. --
123: 306:
a class of games. If the article is kept, it should probably be reformatted appropriately. I'll wait for more information before !voting, though.
258: 89: 84: 93: 76: 326: 178: 145: 17: 452:
An expert tag is a good idea. I was hoping to draw some experts from the game theory WikiProject, but it seems moribund. --
384: 139: 374:
yields 751 hits, with every paper on the first page of hits being about the game theoretic aspect of the problem;
484: 370:
Looking into this more, this topic is a well-known game-theoretic problem from the Talmud. A GScholar search for
40: 461: 435: 413: 396: 360: 330: 312: 270: 246: 226: 206: 58: 295: 135: 423: 80: 356: 185: 480: 457: 392: 266: 36: 375: 56: 299: 171: 291: 279: 278:
From a cursory search it looks like bankruptcy problems in general are certainly a noted form of
72: 64: 290:
bankruptcy problem", which makes me think that bankruptcy problems are a class of problems like
151: 352: 242: 222: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
479:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
453: 388: 344: 262: 53: 348: 430: 307: 407: 238: 218: 200: 195: 110: 419:
object to the article being here, but we should at the very least tag it with
473:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
378:
looks like a promising survey of the field. Likewise,
106: 102: 98: 170: 302:- both of which are specific well-known incarnations 282:, but I'm seeing very fe resources that are saying " 235:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
405:Good enough for me - nom withdrawn. Thanks Mark. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 487:). No further edits should be made to this page. 257:I've place a notice for this discussion at the 215:list of Business-related deletion discussions 184: 8: 233:Note: This debate has been included in the 213:Note: This debate has been included in the 232: 212: 7: 323:2001:558:6014:1C:59C9:BC1E:77E6:F1AD 194:Non-notable article that reads like 24: 286:bankruptcy problem" rather than " 380:"Bankruptcy problem" game theory 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 294:, not a specific problem like 1: 349:10.1016/S0165-4896(01)00075-0 385:Entitlement (fair division) 372:"Bankruptcy problem" talmud 504: 59:15:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 462:16:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 436:14:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 414:13:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 397:13:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 361:10:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 331:18:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 313:20:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 271:20:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 247:17:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 227:17:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 207:13:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 476:Please do not modify it. 296:Guess 2/3 of the average 32:Please do not modify it. 259:game theory wikiproject 52:. Nomination withdrawn 300:Prisoner's dilemma 292:Coordination games 280:bargaining problem 73:Bankruptcy problem 65:Bankruptcy problem 48:The result was 249: 229: 495: 478: 433: 428: 422: 410: 310: 203: 198:or as an essay. 189: 188: 174: 126: 114: 96: 34: 503: 502: 498: 497: 496: 494: 493: 492: 491: 485:deletion review 474: 431: 426: 420: 408: 343:source, namely 308: 201: 131: 122: 87: 71: 68: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 501: 499: 490: 489: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 424:Expert-subject 400: 399: 364: 363: 336: 335: 334: 333: 316: 315: 273: 251: 250: 230: 192: 191: 128: 67: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 500: 488: 486: 482: 477: 471: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 437: 434: 425: 417: 416: 415: 412: 411: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 394: 390: 386: 381: 377: 373: 369: 366: 365: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 338: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 318: 317: 314: 311: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 274: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 211: 210: 209: 208: 205: 204: 197: 187: 183: 180: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 137: 134: 133:Find sources: 129: 125: 121: 118: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 475: 472: 406: 379: 371: 367: 353:Jitse Niesen 339: 304:illustrating 303: 287: 283: 275: 254: 199: 193: 181: 175: 167: 160: 154: 148: 142: 132: 119: 49: 47: 31: 28: 454:Mark viking 389:Mark viking 263:Mark viking 158:free images 54:j⚛e decker 481:talk page 239:• Gene93k 219:• Gene93k 37:talk page 483:or in a 432:0x0077BE 309:0x0077BE 117:View log 39:or in a 409:Lugnuts 340:Comment 298:or the 276:Comment 202:Lugnuts 164:WP refs 152:scholar 90:protect 85:history 136:Google 94:delete 351:. -- 196:WP:OR 179:JSTOR 140:books 124:Stats 111:views 103:watch 99:links 16:< 458:talk 393:talk 376:this 368:Keep 357:talk 327:talk 267:talk 261:. -- 255:Note 243:talk 223:talk 172:FENS 146:news 107:logs 81:talk 77:edit 50:keep 345:doi 284:the 186:TWL 115:– ( 460:) 427:}} 421:{{ 395:) 359:) 329:) 269:) 245:) 237:. 225:) 217:. 166:) 109:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 83:| 79:| 456:( 391:( 355:( 347:: 325:( 288:a 265:( 241:( 221:( 190:) 182:· 176:· 168:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 138:( 130:( 127:) 120:· 113:) 75:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
j⚛e decker

15:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Bankruptcy problem
Bankruptcy problem
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:OR
Lugnuts

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.