Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Barefoot - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

140:
article and personally I think the page in question is a useless article of non-notable, fetishist trivia. It should be deleted for its failure to comply with the notability guidelines and the vague creepiness that accompanies it. POV I know but I think a lot of editors will agree with me on the
129: 292:
What do you mean, nonsensical nomination? The only nonsense here is the fact that anyone has the absence of mind to disagree with me. --
17: 315: 297: 283: 150: 420: 221:. This is the kind of thing that makes Knowledge (XXG) a worthwhile resource, no reason to cut off our nose to spite our face. 199:
I share the nom's sentiments, but this is a topic of cultural importance and it really doesn't need to be deleted at all.
311: 293: 279: 146: 96: 91: 439: 36: 416: 401: 100: 83: 438:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
163: 353: 390: 389:
for this, but it's not a totally nonsensical nom. I thought for a minute and it almost falls under
424: 403: 377: 357: 340: 319: 301: 287: 270: 264: 248: 230: 208: 191: 175: 154: 65: 59: 171: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49: 373: 336: 244: 204: 386: 399: 349: 225: 188: 218: 348:- Definately notable, well written, culturally important and not simply a definition. 87: 53: 263:
sources about this topic, it definitely doesn't seem like just a dicdef/trivia mix.
167: 117: 369: 332: 240: 200: 137: 397: 222: 145:
but I really don't think bare feet warrant an article at all. Who agrees? --
79: 71: 187:, obviously. I fail to understand your logic, but maybe it's may fault. 136:
I stumbled across this article whilst reading the perfectly respectable
239:
Needs some more sources here and there, but not outright deletion --
432:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
331:. Seems encyclopedic enough, and goes well beyond a dicdef. -- 368:
doesn't demonstrate very good faith on the part of the nom.
217:
excellent article, well referenced, notability established
365: 124: 113: 109: 105: 141:above statement. Maybe I'm a tad prejudice because 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 442:). No further edits should be made to this page. 257:because this is important to us foot fetishists 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 425:23:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 404:21:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 378:21:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 358:20:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 341:19:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 320:18:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 302:18:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 288:18:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 271:17:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 249:17:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 231:16:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 209:16:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 192:12:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 176:12:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 155:12:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 66:00:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 459: 278:nonsensical nomination. – 310:Your opinion is noted. – 435:Please do not modify it. 162:This AfD nomination was 32:Please do not modify it. 312:How do you turn this on 294:Jupiter Optimus Maximus 280:How do you turn this on 147:Jupiter Optimus Maximus 417:Planninefromouterspace 52:. Non-admin closure. 385:I was going to cite 166:. It is listed now. 269:and his otters • 366:This edit summary 450: 437: 396: 267: 266:Ten Pound Hammer 228: 127: 121: 103: 62: 56: 44:The result was 34: 458: 457: 453: 452: 451: 449: 448: 447: 446: 440:deletion review 433: 394: 265: 226: 123: 94: 78: 75: 60: 54: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 456: 454: 445: 444: 428: 427: 406: 380: 360: 343: 325: 324: 323: 322: 305: 304: 290: 273: 259:because there 251: 212: 211: 194: 181: 180: 179: 178: 134: 133: 74: 69: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 455: 443: 441: 436: 430: 429: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 398: 392: 388: 384: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 364: 361: 359: 355: 351: 347: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 289: 285: 281: 277: 274: 272: 268: 262: 258: 255: 252: 250: 246: 242: 238: 235: 234: 233: 232: 229: 224: 220: 219:the usual way 216: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 131: 126: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 57: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 434: 431: 415:per JuJube. 412: 408: 383:Keep but ... 382: 362: 345: 328: 275: 260: 256: 253: 236: 214: 213: 196: 184: 142: 135: 45: 43: 31: 28: 413:Strong Keep 346:Strong Keep 143:I hate feet 138:Elle Bishop 391:WP:NOTDICT 350:Theseeker4 164:incomplete 411:becomes 130:View log 80:Barefoot 72:Barefoot 55:MuZemike 363:Comment 168:DumbBOT 97:protect 92:history 50:WP:SNOW 393:. -- 387:WP:DUH 370:JuJube 333:Michig 241:Numyht 201:JuJube 125:delete 101:delete 395:Mufka 189:Tizio 128:) – ( 118:views 110:watch 106:links 16:< 421:talk 409:Keep 374:talk 354:talk 337:talk 329:Keep 316:talk 298:talk 284:talk 276:Keep 254:Keep 245:talk 237:Keep 223:Wily 215:Keep 205:talk 197:Keep 185:Keep 172:talk 151:talk 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 61:talk 48:per 46:keep 261:are 423:) 376:) 356:) 339:) 318:) 300:) 286:) 247:) 207:) 174:) 153:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 64:) 419:( 372:( 352:( 335:( 314:( 296:( 282:( 243:( 227:D 203:( 170:( 149:( 132:) 122:( 120:) 82:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:SNOW
MuZemike
talk
00:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Barefoot
Barefoot
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Elle Bishop
Jupiter Optimus Maximus
talk
12:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
incomplete
DumbBOT
talk
12:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Tizio
12:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
JuJube

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.