Talk:Barefoot - Knowledge (XXG)

1272:, shoes are known to cause permanent damage the feet and either greatly limit their flexibility, often completely immobilising them and preventing proper biomecahnical movement. They also put them at greater risk of sprains, planater warts, athlete's foot, and many other conditions. People who have never worn shoes almost always have toes that are splayed outwards and which distribute weight evenly and can grip like fingers, whereas people who have worn shoes for even a few months during childhood or longer during adulthood have toes that are forced inwards and moulded to the interior shape of the shoe. People who have worn shoes often have toes that are twisted so that the nail points outward horizontally, this is most often seen in the fourth and fifth toes, although it can also occur in some degree in the others, particularly the big toe. Wearing shoes is known to result in toes that point inwards, a condition seen in only Pointed shoes, particularly high-heels, cause extreme pressure on the big toe, forcing it inwards and often resulting in bunions and 'fallen arches' (note that this is a different condition to 'flat feet', which are benign in habitually barefoot people). 1201:

least, doing otherwise is completely foreign to us. In Japan, and many other East-Asian countries I believe, it is one of their most strict customs. A Japanese person may forgive some mistakes of a foreigner, be lenient and/or laid back with some things or simply not be that bothered to obey tradition, but shoes in the house will generally still be a big no-no. In the US, it's a bit mixed and kinda depends on the area. I'm not as sure about the rest of the world, but it seems that Africa and Asia is mostly, if not completely, "no shoe"-zones. As for sources...

1807:. I say, "mostly plagiarized" loosely, as virtually all of the content comes from the Catholic Encyclopedia, which is now in public domain (so it's not really a copyright violation). Still, I would think that the best solution here is to merge the contents of this into the religious section of this article, with the proper citations included, and redirect the old article to this one. The only other significant content of that article is a mere definition of "discalced", which does not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion because it is 1432:

Your objections are invalid since you could easily have fixed any spelling and grammatical errors or POV yourself by adding other material and altering what is there rather than blindly reverting. The fact that you did so, and that you are crying POV without first assuming Good Faith makes your own actions look POV. I cited everything I said. Also, there was only a couple of the mestakes - hardly 'NUMEROUS spelling errors'. The grammar seems fine, but you may change it if you wish, that is what the edit button is for.

158: 414: 393: 2447: 723: 702: 142: 1568:

start re-writing the intro without citations. I will continue to include Shullman's reaserch, but without the URLs you detest. I am trying to compromise with you here, but you are acting as though your word were law. The age of the study is not relevant and, in any case, I have provided newer studies to back it up. Studies of this type are hard to come by, but they are far more valid than most of the other citations I found in the article.

250: 2411:

wearing a closed-toe shoe. Also "The Hookworm parasite is relatively mild, has few symptoms, and can pass completely unnoticed when the infestation level is low enough. Since the hookworm infection is very cheap and easy to treat......" Again they are downplaying the risk. Also the pro-barefoot sources tend to be none medical site, news articles or junk science sites that are not part of the medical community.

424: 875:

usually do. I think the statement is the equivalent of saying, "being illiterate is a human's natural state," or, "being naked is a human's natural state". Shoes may be as old as clothing, and certainly have been part of human culture longer than reading, so why would wearing shoes be "unnatural", which is what saying "being barefoot is a human's natural state" implies. --

609: 362: 519: 498: 529: 630: 733: 816:

seems to have been written almost exclusively from a US perspective). Just one example: there are several sentences and even a photograph relating to one particular guy in some US city who was apparently known locally for going barefoot. This has no place in an article focusing on a global topic stretching back thousands of years.

1719:. I will set up a redirect to prevent further confusion on this matter. If you live in America, simply go to your nearest major library and ask for the appropriate Journal, you should be able to read the research for yourself although they probably only have it on microfilm. If they do not have it, then 2611:

This is pretty strange. Excluding the comparison image of “shoed” and “unshoed” feet, pretty much every image of barefoot people are of women barefoot. The only exceptions are the image of the statue, the Buddhist monks, and the sports image. Additionally, I really find it implausible we need so many

1700:

Hello folks! Might I offer myself as a neutral party/observer who knows nothing about barefooting? Could I possibly impose on each of you to take a step back and not make any edits for, let's say, an hour? I have been watching the two of you for that long (During my vandal patrolling), and I think it

1606:

Could you please speak to me nicely and try to resolve this? I am just trying to edit this article and include relevant and important information. If you have a problem with this information you should discuss it with me before reverting. As for a moderation query, I will post the information on your

1392:

These last two paragraphs have nothing to do with the preceding paragraphs, and were copied rather sloppily from the lead section, and should have stayed there. They are largely backing up information in later sections under sports and laws. Although the citations backing up the "barefooter" term are

1344:

against bare feet. While private business owners are free to set their own policies, many also cite nonexistent health regulations, though these typically are requirements that pertain to employees, not customers. Many people also believe that it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle barefoot, though

961:

a citation (which is supported by the fact that four separate people have removed the "citation needed"-tag, while only one person puts it back). Suggesting that footwear may be as old as clothing, is completely irrelevant. Wearing shoes IS unnatural. As is wearing clothes ...and using computers (and

956:

the same. It's unsourced because it's ridiculous to require a source! No one would bother to add one, because anyone who doesn't simply oppose the statement, and thus wouldn't want to support it by giving a citation, doesn't want to denigrate it, by doing something that involves tacit agreement, that

874:

I think the inclusion of "Being barefoot is a human's natural state" is a problem, as it seems to be POV advocacy of going barefoot, as well as being unsourced. I suspect that the only sources that could be cited for the statement are ones that advocate people going barefoot much more often than they

1571:

As this has gone on far enough and we are getting nowhere I will launch a moderator query. I would point out that your prejudice here is showing and you have plainly not read any of the related information since, if you had, you would know that the Journal of the National Association of Chiropodists

1567:

You are removing large amounts of cited material without any conversation over what seems to be a very small and semantic point. As you seem to be trying to force the article to remain as it is I will re-instate the edits to the Health section (which you did not complain about in your last post) and

1563:

Please don't do this, you are plainly resorting to semantics in order to push your point, I have no interest in what you are pulling. Your personal preference has nothing to do with the way wiki is run and I would like you to please speak to me in a civil manor, stop acting like you own the page and

1184:

I note this sentence from the intro paragraph contains unscientific weasel words: "Many people do not wear footwear in their home and some expect visitors to do the same." Is there any evidence to quantify the Many and Some? Is it known if there is an increasing/decreasing trend for barefooting in

2406:

It's clear most of this article was written by barefooters and food fetish. I have researched this topic in great detail and find little reliable evidence that a person that goes barefoot will have healthier feet that someone that wears proper well fitting shoes. It also lacks sources that any side

2163:

This sentence is historically confusing. By the time the Slave Trade in the Americas was happening, the "Middle Ages" were over. Very little European-American contact happened during the period that is considered the Middle Ages, and it could be argued that slaves in "The Old World" were frequently

1279:

During his study of feet in China and India that had never worn shoes, Dr Samuel Shulman discovered that of the 9.01% that had any notable foot condition only 0.89% of the people studied had foot complaints which could be linked to walking barefoot (including temporary conditions such as abrasions)

1247:

Secondly, several citations and new information was inserted into the lead section. This is also improper. The lead should be a summary. Cited material should go into individual sections. Some citations are acceptable, if necessary, but not nearly the quantity of material that was just added there.

1039:

Zarlan, I challenge you to cite a reliable source that says going barefoot is the natural state for humans. I suspect that the only sources you will find saying that will be sources advocating that people go barefoot. Knowledge (XXG) should not be pushing the agenda that wearing shoes is unnatural.

815:

This article is generally poorly written and needs serious attention from an editor. The problems include: rambling sentences that stray off topic, overly-verbose choice of terminology, a lack of sources, a tendency to promote barefootedness as a virtue, and major issues with worldview (the article

1431:

Please do not remove cited material in favor of uncited material in order to support your own views. It is perfectly allowable to mention someone who conducted a study, it is a method used all over Wiki and in academic essays. However I will edit the article again to reduce references to the name.

1647:

Please could you explain to me, point by point, what your problem is with what I wrote? Without making fun of my spelling. I had no idea that there was anything there which was "challenged or likely to be challenged", this is hardly a political issue and you could have critiqued and then we could

1243:

I just removed the following section from the article, which really contains multiple information on multiple topics, most of which should have been added elsewhere and not in a section entitled 'going barefoot'. For starters, citations should be inserted immediately following punctuation with no

1200:

In many European countries, it is the norm to take off ones shoes/sandals when going in to a home. Socks may be kept on if one wants to, and one may wear indoor slippers (if you have one at home, or the host has them for guests), so it is inaccurate to call it barefoot. In the Nordic countries at

1231:

I've travelled to 75 countries and I'm not aware of ANY places outside of North America and some parts of Africa in which it is considered to be acceptable to wear shoes inside a house. Certainly in Australia, New Zealand, Europe and Asia it is unusual to wear shoes inside. However, in Korea and

2410:

This article also downplays the risk associated with going barefoot. One part that really stuck out was about Hook-Worms. " its spread cannot be stopped by most standard shoes since the larvae can penetrate fabric and small holes" In reality the risk of Hook-Worm infection is greatly reduced by

2072:

OPPOSE. There is a long-standing historical confusion between the terms "barefoot" and "discalced", especially in the context of the cultural practices of Christian religious congregations. "Discalced" means "without shoes", and includes the wearing of sandals or heel-less slippers. Some of the

1292:

While citing a study is acceptable, it's generally considered improper to mention the name of the researcher in the article itself, unless they are very well known. In this case, it's completely unacceptable to mention Dr. Shulman's name here, as it can be seen as advertising his work, which is

1018:

Donald isn't saying that people are born with shoes. He's simply reading "natural" to mean "normal", "acceptable", "comfortable", etc., all of which are valid synonyms. This is a valid reading, even though that's not Zarlan's reading (nor likely the intent of whoever put it in). Hence I suggest

1714:

0k, I took myself away from this for a few days. WTF, you seem to be confusing 'fix' with 'delete everything', that section I wrote would work fine with just the Zipfel citations and you had no reason to keep deleting it wholesale when you could have easily changed it with little effort. I can

847:

This article contains a lot of unreferenced material that, in tone, may have come from some kind of school paper. It needs many more citations to validate statements such as, "Contrary to popular assumption the state of poverty has never been an actual reason for unwantedly (sic) having to go

1112:

Zarlan just got several in my new edits, particularly the Nature one. I have heavily cited my research and hope it is acceptable, please do not just blindly revert because you don't like it. Shoes are not natural, they are a man-made item that does not occur in nature and is so-far unique to

1312:

Walking barefoot results in a more natural gait, with the most natural belonging to those who have never worn them. People who walk barefoot tend to land with the forefoot or mid-foot, which eliminates the hard heel strike and generates much less collision force in the foot and lower

1513:

I am also seriously concerned that much of Shulman's work is "published" in the so-called "Journal of the National Association of Chiropodists", a supposed "journal" which does not have a currently active website, and of which the material in it cannot be verified. For example,

1251:

Most of the material belongs under the 'health implications' section, and not in a new section, as it primarily deals with medical issues. I removed them outright because there are NUMEROUS spelling and grammatical errors, and several citations which cannot be verified.

1053:, valid synonyms for "natural". There is no way in which natural means, or implies, those qualities. "Normal" and "acceptable" is especially untrue, given that the full sentence is (with italics added here, for emphasis): "Being barefoot is a human's natural state, 1522:

completely. It's also over 60 years old, so more current research would be favored. It should also be pointed out that there are a lot of completely bogus journals in China that "publish" either bogus studies, or republish copyrighted works, and these also FAIL

1701:

might help. Certainly an hour away from wikipedia would not be as wasteful as this last hour? Even if only one of you does this, I will appreciate it. You can always come back and start right back up again. Could I intrigue one or both of you to try this? --

2277:

This is an irrelevant statement, isn't it? To the best of my knowledge bare feet are also allowed in any public place in NYC, so the fact that bare feet are allowed in public parks is far from remarkable. In addition, such statement may lead to confusion.

1483:

I reverted you again because of too many citations in the lead paragraph. The lead section is supposed to be a summary, and NOT for the introduction of new material. In my experience, editors that insert too much new material in the lead are generally

907:

I think to avoid further controversy, this statement can be removed completely. Both sides of the debate would agree that it is common sense humans are born without shoes, and yet it is not the norm to be unshod, thus why even put this in the article?

2229:"Many place don't let bad people have shoe. In old time, slave not have shoe either. Other people have shoe. So it make people without shoe stand out. It also make them more likely get hurt by drop rock. Or step on rock. It make for more shame too." 2180:

But I am unsure of the citation, if it should be left intact or if the text (notably: Not a Historical Document) makes specific inclusion of that phrase. The resulting sentence makes more historical sense, but I was never much good with citations!

2668:

which is used as a reference by the current version of the Knowledge (XXG) article claims that there is such a law, but that website does not look reliably and it does not mention which specific law requires such a license. Other websites like

2126:

It should be "hookworm", no capital, as it is not a proper noun (like a name or a title) but just a noun like "dog", describing an animal. I agree about the frostbite comment, it should be made into it's own paragraph about frostbite and feet.

2685:

where the Texas Department of State Health Services recommends not to "walk barefoot in areas where hookworm is common and where there may be fecal contamination", but even they do not mention anything about any law against being barefoot.

1648:

have sorted this out. The ONLY reason I asked for a resolution was because you kept 'nuking' the page. If it was just the Shullman citations you could have removed them and left the rest or explained the issue and gotten me to remove them.

1151:

Your edits were reverted because there were far too many spelling and grammatical errors, they didn't agree with wiki formatting, and they were added to an improper and unnecessary section, not the section where they belonged. See below.

1280:

or having the tops of the feet uncovered. Almost all of the feet recorded in the study were described as in 'perfect' health and being completely free from the large number of conditions known to be caused by shoes, such as corns and

2407:

effects of wearing shoes will diminish a persons quality of life. Meaning a slightly bent toe will cause any pain. Furthermore it leads a reader to believe that food ailments such as falling arches are only caused by wearing shoes.

2297:

I've noticed that there are no specific references of past or present populations in which barefoot lifestyle is common or predominant, or information about the different regional prevalence of barefoot lifestyle in the world.

1723:. I have already emailed two of these library and confirmed that they have the paper on microfilm. I have an American friend who made a copy and sent it to me, so I have read the research in full. Shullman is a valid source. 1065:... It's a bit tricky to google, but ask anyone who is active in the debate, and they'll no doubt find many a source. Also, ask any biologist och physician, if being barefoot is our natural state, and they will say yes. 951:

to encourage being barefoot, it's merely an accurate description of what being barefoot is. Furthermore statements such as "being illiterate is a human's natural state," or, "being naked is a human's natural state" are

2513: 1402:

I normally don't like to delete such material en masse like this, but this was very sloppily added, and added to unnecessary and improper sections. Furthermore, many of the "citations" appear to violate

1268:

There are few risks and many benefits associated with going barefoot. While footwear provides some protection from cuts, abrasions, and bruises, from objects on the ground, as well as protection from

135: 150: 1664:

If you read the edit summaries I just made, I think I've already outlined the specific problems that I've fixed. Also, I've removed all of the Shulman quack citations, since they were invalid.

988:: "though for functional, fashion, and social reasons footwear is generally worn." (thus stating shoe-wearing as normal, speaking of the mentions above, of "normal"). Discussing a bit of text, 2543: 2520: 1633:

again. It does not explicitly ban citations in the lead, but it does discourage them, as the lead is supposed to be a summary, summarizing the information presented in the article itself.

934:

My point is that it seems to me that the only people who say "going barefoot is natural" are people who are advocating that people go barefoot more often. That makes the statement POV. --

2681:

mentions lots of different permits and licenses, but it does not mention any barefoot permit. The only official information about walking barefoot in Texas which I could find is at

2164:

enforced barefoot, as well. I feel we would do better by simply excising the phrase "in the New World" (which is it's own imperialist can of worms) so that the sentence would read:

684: 547: 261: 2487: 2674: 551: 2765: 674: 2111:(Another maybe minor thing: there is some writing about "natural gait" both at the beginning and end of a paragraph which seems a little redundant, but I'm not sure...) - 1715:

understand your confusion over The National Association of Chiropodists since they changed their name before the internet came around, these days they call themselves the

2770: 2101:

There is a whole paragraph about hookworms. The last sentence, about keeping feet warm using shoes, seems completely unrelated. Should it be in a different paragraph?

1997: 1957: 171: 650: 2170:

During the Middle Ages, both men and women wore pattens, commonly seen as the predecessor of the modern high-heeled shoe, while the poor and lower classes in Europe,

2664:

Currently this article claims that there is a law in Texas which requires people to get a license for walking barefoot. That seems to be an urban myth. The website

2560:. I don't think we need a foot-fetish porn gallery to help increase a reader's understanding of bare feet; I imagine the overwhelming majority have at least one. – 2547: 1113:

humanity. A better word for what Zarlan means is that going barefoot is 'innate', which it certainly and very provably is - it is as innate as going bare-handed.

848:

barefoot in any civilized culture, as simple forms of footwear could freely be handmade with disposable materials throughout all ages and in all surroundings."

480: 79: 2760: 591: 2153:, both men and women wore pattens, commonly seen as the predecessor of the modern high-heeled shoe, while the poor and lower classes in Europe, as well as 637: 614: 2740: 885:

It's not POV to say that being barefoot is natural, as I stated in my edit summary "we are not born with shoes". I think a better wording is to replace

819:

I had a bit of a crack at tidying it up, but there's too much work to be done here and I suspect that this is one article that is prone to edit-warring.

470: 793: 332: 2750: 581: 2589:, the organized media collection from which we would be picking for the gallery. I agree with Squared.Circle.Boxing, that what we have now suffices. 1838:

article could use some work. It'll never be a long article as it's very short subject matter. There's more content than should be rolled into the

2226:

The current wording is overly verbose and pedantic. To counteract this and improve readability, I propose the "caveman" version of that paragraph:

85: 2780: 2755: 783: 2012: 1527:. For these reasons, anything that is added to this article by Shulman or any of his associates should be deleted swiftly and without prejudice. 446: 184: 1716: 556: 276: 2730: 2725: 2675:

https://www.khou.com/article/news/local/verify/verify-is-it-against-the-law-to-go-barefoot-in-public/285-d96ebdb6-d896-458e-b866-386c685287f9

2633:

an exaggeration. That said, there are eight pictures of women, three of men, & one of a woman & her son, so 76.112.35.87 has a point.

2025: 1981: 1953: 271: 2785: 2443:

There are shoes for horses and similar animals, varying on the circumstances. Some specialised boots are also in use by horses, e.g. here:

1488:, since they're trying to get their point across earlier in the article to insure that it is read. This is unacceptable. You should review 1081: 855: 30: 759: 1629:

by inserting too much information which was "challenged or likely to be challenged", and I called you out on it. Once again, please read

2735: 2348: 2299: 2279: 2745: 2670: 2613: 2242: 1293:

against Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. The person that added this also needs to figure out whether Shulman is spelled with one l or two.

437: 398: 267: 99: 989: 2073:"discalced" congregations of consecrated religious prohibited their members from going barefoot. So, the terms are not synonymous. 542: 503: 104: 20: 2775: 1720: 1518:

is not in standard journal formatting, is posted on an unclear domain (ahcuah.com), and could easily be a bogus site. This FAILS

270:

at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be

44: 74: 2578: 2480: 2427: 746: 707: 373: 1029: 918: 984:

The idea that "Being barefoot is a human's natural state" is added as advocacy for going barefoot, is especially ludicrous,

65: 2381:

since you uploaded it, but I don't think it adds anything to the article and frankly, this looks like a vanity edit to me.

2378: 2092:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

649:

related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2528: 2495: 1816: 1789: 1669: 1638: 1597: 1532: 1412: 1326: 1298: 1257: 1157: 2257:

Your proposed "caveman" version is worse than merely being overly verbose and pedantic ...and it contains falsehoods.--

1062: 249: 2568: 2561: 208: 1589: 1588:

I'm the one pushing a point? Ha! LOL! That's a good one! Please stop. You're approaching vandalism at this point.

109: 2116: 2078: 1564:

reverting all my edits, and to please show me the rule saying you can't cite things in the first section. Please?

1244:

space between the citation and the punctuation. They DO NOT go before the punctuation, period, end of statement.

230: 2389: 2262: 2206: 1972: 1847: 1625:

I've already explained the two citations in the lead that are currently there. Your edits to the lead violated

1218: 1077: 997: 975: 859: 126: 1393:

acceptable here because the term is notable and there's not really a better place to put it in a main section.

379: 2509:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2476:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2372: 2352: 2303: 2283: 2617: 2524: 2491: 2462: 2246: 1812: 1785: 1745: 1728: 1665: 1653: 1634: 1616: 1593: 1577: 1528: 1437: 1408: 1322: 1294: 1253: 1153: 1118: 1058: 1041: 935: 876: 221: 217: 213: 2415: 2344: 2238: 1069: 851: 823: 2665: 2612:

images of essentially the same thing: barefoot people. I opt for removing some of the unnecessary images.

2324: 2186: 2132: 2074: 1190: 191: 1842:

so I think each article stays as is. If other editors can agree to merge it in, I could live with that.

55: 2691: 2316: 2198:

I removed the offending phrase. There was already verbiage in the lede about slaves not wearing shoes.

1947: 1738: 893:. This makes more sense. Shoes are "normal" in almost every society in the world with few exceptions.-- 758:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

445:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

70: 2586: 2112: 2419: 361: 2671:

https://www.conchovalleyhomepage.com/news/texas/real-or-myth-we-fact-checked-16-strange-texas-laws/

2423: 2383: 2258: 2200: 2063: 1843: 1592:

by threatening a "moderator query", whatever the hell that is, is not an acceptable solution here.

1214: 1073: 993: 971: 2649: 2458: 2035: 1991: 1741: 1724: 1649: 1612: 1573: 1433: 1207: 1114: 1025: 914: 235: 198: 2319:

do you have any information you could add? Some information re Australia, NZ, UK has been added

1345:

there are no laws in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and other places against it.

2677:

say that it is legal in Texas to be barefoot. The official website from the State of Texas at

2446: 2320: 2182: 2128: 2022: 1978: 833: 413: 392: 313: 51: 2558:

The purpose of an image is to increase readers' understanding of the article's subject matter

1630: 1626: 1608: 1489: 2706: 2687: 2594: 1702: 1611:

contains two citations in its lead-in and specifically says you should cite as appropriate.

1381: 1361: 1353: 963: 646: 232: 1808: 1485: 1404: 2050: 1377: 1357: 1186: 534: 1524: 1519: 1376:. The term may also be used to describe someone participating in certain sports, such as 2014:

Run for Life: The Anti-Aging, Anti-Injury, Super-Fitness Plan to Keep You Running to 100

1887: 177: 2678: 2641: 2637: 2108:

article itself is inconsistent right now, too, but I'm not sure which it should be...?

2059: 898: 429: 1826:

OPPOSE. I can understand your logic. It would seem, however, that the definition of

722: 701: 2719: 2645: 2505:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

2472:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

1020: 909: 738: 2682: 1372:. In modern language, someone who prefers to not wear shoes in public is known as a 1063:

http://www.apma.org/MainMenu/News/MediaRoom/PositionStatements/Barefoot-Running.aspx

2451: 1369: 1204: 829: 828:

The Summary especially needs attention; the majority of it is about imprisonment!

1888:"Conclusions Drawn From a Comparative Study of Barefoot and Shoe-Wearing Peoples" 2702: 2590: 1974:

Barefoot water skiing: an illustrated guide to learning and mastering the sport

1784:

Closing discussion. No consensus to merge, and in fact, opposition to merging.

1284:. Shullman concluded that "Footgear is the greatest enemy of the human foot." . 1839: 1365: 1341: 1055:

though for functional, fashion, and social reasons footwear is generally worn.

728: 524: 423: 419: 2701:

Those are all reasonable concerns. I removed the statement from the article.

1572:

is an entirely valid source and that that article wasn't published by China.

165: 1928: 1804: 1760: 1515: 1340:

Many stores, restaurants, and other public venues in the United States have

1269: 894: 442: 1321:

No citation provided here. Though this is largely covered in other areas.

1210: 2105: 1059:

http://www.healthcommunities.com/foot-anatomy/foot-anatomy-overview.shtml

755: 125: 24: 2222:

Proposed change to the wording in the "Imprisonment and slavery" section

629: 608: 2666:

https://kisselpaso.com/13-weird-texas-state-laws-that-are-still-active/

1281: 967: 2018: 751: 642: 1803:

There is a very short. poorly-cited and mostly plagiarized article,

234: 518: 497: 2514:

Discobolus in National Roman Museum Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.JPG

970:. Shoes are normal (depending on the society), but not natural.-- 1057:". As to there being no sources, aside from pro-barfoot ones... 554:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at 2710: 2695: 2653: 2621: 2598: 2580: 2551: 2532: 2499: 2466: 2431: 2396: 2356: 2328: 2307: 2287: 2266: 2250: 2213: 2190: 2136: 2120: 2082: 2067: 1851: 1820: 1793: 1749: 1732: 1705: 1673: 1657: 1642: 1620: 1601: 1581: 1536: 1441: 1416: 1330: 1302: 1261: 1222: 1194: 1161: 1122: 1085: 1044: 1034: 1001: 979: 938: 923: 902: 879: 863: 837: 141: 1929:"Survey in China and India of Feet That Have Never Worn Shoes" 355: 236: 15: 943:

The statement "Being barefoot is a human's natural state" is

546:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the 1607:

talk page. My lead-in may have needed a bit of editing, but

1352:

There are many sports which people play barefoot, including

2377:

This article has enough images already. I'm sure you like

149: 1933:

The Journal of the National Association of Chiropodists

1739:

here is the history page of their website confirming it

1462:

Four spelling errors just in your comments alone. Fail!

822:

Good luck to whoever takes on the challenge! Preceding

325: 306: 2273:

Bare feet are allowed in public parks in New York City

2097:

Keep the hookworms warm? (Health implications section)

1049:

Neither "normal", "acceptable" or "comfortable" are,

2679:

https://www.texas.gov/government-services-directory/

1777:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

750:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 641:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 441:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 280:

of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

197: 2683:https://www.dshs.texas.gov/hookworm/hookworm-faqs 2607:All of the photos of barefoot people are of women 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1205:http://knol.google.com/k/shoes-off-at-the-door# 550:and that biomedical information in any article 2519:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 2486:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 659:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Health and fitness 2538:We need a gallery there is too little images. 1780:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 1208:Etiquette_in_Japan#Visiting_someone.27s_house 548:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles 157: 8: 1996:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 1977:. World Publications, Incorporated. p. 161. 1956:) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2766:Low-importance Health and fitness articles 2104:Also, is it "hookworm" or "Hookworm"? The 962:editing wikipedia). You are preforming an 849: 696: 603: 492: 387: 285: 244: 992:, isn't particularly constructive, IMO.-- 986:when you look at the rest of the sentence 557:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine 262:Social sciences and society good articles 2640:rather than Joss Stone, since Franti is 2445: 1019:removing the phrase to avoid argument. ~ 2771:WikiProject Health and fitness articles 2636:I do think we should have a picture of 2450:Horse modeling four different types of 1892:The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 1860: 1232:Japan, light slippers are usually worn. 1211:http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2001.html 698: 662:Template:WikiProject Health and fitness 605: 494: 389: 359: 2627: 2557: 2045: 2044: 2033: 1989: 1945: 1717:American Podiatric Medical Association 2544:2601:84:8902:25C0:6480:D7F0:1877:A5EC 455:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 183: 7: 2235:But it really should be changed... 1771:The following discussion is closed. 744:This article is within the scope of 635:This article is within the scope of 566:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine 540:This article is within the scope of 435:This article is within the scope of 2761:B-Class Health and fitness articles 1927:Shulman, Pod.D,, Samuel B. (1949). 1721:here is a list of libraries that do 378:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 768:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Nudity 14: 2741:Low-importance sociology articles 1952:: CS1 maint: extra punctuation ( 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 2751:Low-importance medicine articles 2088:The discussion above is closed. 731: 721: 700: 628: 607: 552:use high-quality medical sources 527: 517: 496: 422: 412: 391: 360: 248: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1912:Howell, Phd, Dr Daniel (2010). 1864: 788:This article has been rated as 679:This article has been rated as 586:This article has been rated as 475:This article has been rated as 2781:Mid-importance nudity articles 2756:All WikiProject Medicine pages 2432:11:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 1971:Scarpa, R; Dorner, T. (1988). 966:, which you should know to be 638:WikiProject Health and fitness 458:Template:WikiProject Sociology 266:nominee, but did not meet the 1: 2585:We already have two links to 2533:02:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC) 2500:19:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC) 2467:15:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC) 2379:File:Feet in central park.JPG 2214:20:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 2191:19:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 2137:19:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 2121:00:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 1821:15:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC) 762:and see a list of open tasks. 653:and see a list of open tasks. 569:Template:WikiProject Medicine 449:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2731:Old requests for peer review 2726:Former good article nominees 2654:17:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC) 2622:08:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC) 2542:Exactly what the title says 1873:Take Off Your Shoes and Walk 1871:Wilker, Dr Simon J. (1961). 1750:14:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 1733:13:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 1706:23:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1674:23:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1658:22:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1643:22:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1621:22:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1602:22:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1582:21:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1537:18:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1442:18:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 1417:15:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1331:15:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1303:15:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1262:15:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1162:15:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1123:22:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 1086:07:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1045:00:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 1035:20:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 1002:18:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 980:18:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 939:13:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 924:00:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 903:12:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 880:12:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 838:10:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 2786:WikiProject Nudity articles 2397:01:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 771:Template:WikiProject Nudity 665:Health and fitness articles 349:Former good article nominee 2802: 2736:B-Class sociology articles 2642:notable for going barefoot 2068:18:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 1492:before continuing further. 1223:07:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 1195:13:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 990:while ignoring the context 794:project's importance scale 685:project's importance scale 592:project's importance scale 481:project's importance scale 274:. Editors may also seek a 2746:B-Class medicine articles 2599:01:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 2587:commons:Category:Barefoot 2581:01:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 2552:00:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC) 2481:Anklet on female feet.jpg 2357:15:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC) 2329:09:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC) 2143:The Middle Age New World? 1852:23:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 787: 716: 678: 623: 585: 512: 474: 407: 386: 346: 288: 284: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2711:17:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) 2696:02:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC) 2308:17:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC) 2288:17:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC) 2267:11:39, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 2251:02:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC) 2090:Please do not modify it. 2083:13:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC) 1886:Hoffmann, Phil. (1905). 1794:20:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 1774:Please do not modify it. 864:18:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) 2776:B-Class nudity articles 2155:slaves in the New World 2454: 2011:Wallack, R.M. (2009). 870:Barefoot being natural 811:Poorly written article 368:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2449: 1840:the Wikitionary entry 438:WikiProject Sociology 372:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 268:good article criteria 123:Find medical sources: 100:Neutral point of view 2341:Is this an advert? 2293:Barefoot populations 2019:Sky Horse Publishing 543:WikiProject Medicine 314:Good article nominee 105:No original research 2439:Footwear for horses 2525:Community Tech bot 2492:Community Tech bot 2455: 2373:Northeastern Nomad 747:WikiProject Nudity 656:Health and fitness 615:Health and fitness 461:sociology articles 374:content assessment 289:Article milestones 129: 86:dispute resolution 47: 2660:alleged Texas law 2628:All of the photos 2435: 2418:comment added by 2370: 2347:comment added by 2337:Charity campaigns 2241:comment added by 2172:as well as slaves 2043:External link in 2027:978-1-60239-344-8 1983:978-0-944406-01-4 1914:The Barefoot Book 1830:does not include 1089: 1072:comment added by 1033: 922: 866: 854:comment added by 843:Original research 808: 807: 804: 803: 800: 799: 695: 694: 691: 690: 602: 601: 598: 597: 572:medicine articles 491: 490: 487: 486: 354: 353: 342: 341: 243: 242: 128:Source guidelines 127: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2793: 2575: 2565: 2434: 2412: 2395: 2392: 2386: 2376: 2368: 2359: 2253: 2212: 2209: 2203: 2174:, were barefoot. 2157:, were barefoot. 2055: 2054: 2048: 2047: 2041: 2039: 2031: 2008: 2002: 2001: 1995: 1987: 1968: 1962: 1961: 1951: 1943: 1941: 1939: 1924: 1918: 1917: 1909: 1903: 1902: 1900: 1898: 1883: 1877: 1876: 1868: 1834:. Granted, the 1809:not a dictionary 1776: 1590:WP:WIKILAWYERING 1382:barefoot running 1362:beach volleyball 1088: 1066: 1023: 964:appeal to nature 912: 776: 775: 772: 769: 766: 741: 736: 735: 734: 725: 718: 717: 712: 704: 697: 667: 666: 663: 660: 657: 647:physical fitness 632: 625: 624: 619: 611: 604: 574: 573: 570: 567: 564: 537: 532: 531: 530: 521: 514: 513: 508: 500: 493: 463: 462: 459: 456: 453: 432: 427: 426: 416: 409: 408: 403: 395: 388: 371: 365: 364: 356: 347:Current status: 328: 309: 286: 252: 245: 237: 202: 201: 187: 161: 153: 145: 131: 95:Article policies 16: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2716: 2715: 2662: 2609: 2569: 2562: 2540: 2521:nomination page 2507: 2488:nomination page 2474: 2441: 2413: 2404: 2390: 2384: 2382: 2367: 2365: 2342: 2339: 2295: 2275: 2236: 2224: 2207: 2201: 2199: 2145: 2113:ZeniffMartineau 2099: 2094: 2093: 2075:Basilwatkinsosb 2058: 2042: 2032: 2028: 2010: 2009: 2005: 1988: 1984: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1944: 1937: 1935: 1926: 1925: 1921: 1916:. Hunter House. 1911: 1910: 1906: 1896: 1894: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1870: 1869: 1862: 1801: 1772: 1765: 1378:barefoot skiing 1241: 1182: 1067: 872: 845: 813: 774:nudity articles 773: 770: 767: 764: 763: 737: 732: 730: 710: 664: 661: 658: 655: 654: 617: 571: 568: 565: 562: 561: 535:Medicine portal 533: 528: 526: 506: 460: 457: 454: 451: 450: 428: 421: 401: 369: 324: 305: 239: 238: 233: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2799: 2797: 2789: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2773: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2743: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2713: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2638:Michael Franti 2634: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2539: 2536: 2517: 2516: 2506: 2503: 2484: 2483: 2473: 2470: 2452:brushing boots 2440: 2437: 2403: 2402:Biased article 2400: 2385:Chris Troutman 2364: 2361: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2294: 2291: 2274: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2259:ZarlanTheGreen 2223: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2202:Chris Troutman 2178: 2177: 2176: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2098: 2095: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2057: 2056: 2026: 2003: 1982: 1963: 1919: 1904: 1878: 1859: 1857: 1855: 1854: 1844:Chris troutman 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1767: 1766: 1764: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1709: 1708: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1569: 1565: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1387: 1386: 1348: 1347: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1316: 1315: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1287: 1286: 1275: 1274: 1240: 1239:Going barefoot 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1226: 1225: 1215:ZarlanTheGreen 1202: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1074:ZarlanTheGreen 1037: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 994:ZarlanTheGreen 982: 972:ZarlanTheGreen 929: 928: 927: 926: 871: 868: 856:108.221.18.208 844: 841: 812: 809: 806: 805: 802: 801: 798: 797: 790:Mid-importance 786: 780: 779: 777: 760:the discussion 743: 742: 726: 714: 713: 711:Mid‑importance 705: 693: 692: 689: 688: 681:Low-importance 677: 671: 670: 668: 651:the discussion 633: 621: 620: 618:Low‑importance 612: 600: 599: 596: 595: 588:Low-importance 584: 578: 577: 575: 539: 538: 522: 510: 509: 507:Low‑importance 501: 489: 488: 485: 484: 477:Low-importance 473: 467: 466: 464: 447:the discussion 434: 433: 430:Society portal 417: 405: 404: 402:Low‑importance 396: 384: 383: 377: 366: 352: 351: 344: 343: 340: 339: 336: 329: 321: 320: 317: 310: 302: 301: 298: 295: 291: 290: 282: 281: 253: 241: 240: 231: 229: 228: 225: 224: 204: 203: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2798: 2787: 2784: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2721: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2667: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2606: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2573: 2566: 2564: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2537: 2535: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2504: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2482: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2471: 2469: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459:Johnsoniensis 2453: 2448: 2444: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2408: 2401: 2399: 2398: 2393: 2387: 2380: 2374: 2362: 2360: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2349:81.152.129.83 2346: 2336: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2300:81.60.184.134 2292: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2280:81.60.184.134 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2221: 2215: 2210: 2204: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2175: 2173: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2158: 2156: 2152: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2109: 2107: 2102: 2096: 2091: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2052: 2037: 2029: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2007: 2004: 1999: 1993: 1985: 1980: 1976: 1975: 1967: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1949: 1934: 1930: 1923: 1920: 1915: 1908: 1905: 1893: 1889: 1882: 1879: 1874: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1858: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1769: 1768: 1762: 1759: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1521: 1517: 1516:this citation 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1249: 1245: 1238: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1180:Weasel words? 1179: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1042:Donald Albury 1038: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 960: 955: 950: 947:POV! It does 946: 942: 941: 940: 937: 936:Donald Albury 933: 932: 931: 930: 925: 920: 916: 911: 906: 905: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 883: 882: 881: 878: 877:Donald Albury 869: 867: 865: 861: 857: 853: 842: 840: 839: 835: 831: 826: 825: 820: 817: 810: 795: 791: 785: 782: 781: 778: 761: 757: 753: 749: 748: 740: 739:Nudity portal 729: 727: 724: 720: 719: 715: 709: 706: 703: 699: 686: 682: 676: 673: 672: 669: 652: 648: 644: 640: 639: 634: 631: 627: 626: 622: 616: 613: 610: 606: 593: 589: 583: 580: 579: 576: 559: 558: 553: 549: 545: 544: 536: 525: 523: 520: 516: 515: 511: 505: 502: 499: 495: 482: 478: 472: 469: 468: 465: 448: 444: 440: 439: 431: 425: 420: 418: 415: 411: 410: 406: 400: 397: 394: 390: 385: 381: 375: 367: 363: 358: 357: 350: 345: 337: 335: 334: 330: 327: 326:July 15, 2010 323: 322: 318: 316: 315: 311: 308: 304: 303: 299: 296: 293: 292: 287: 283: 279: 278: 273: 269: 265: 264: 263: 257: 254: 251: 247: 246: 227: 226: 223: 219: 215: 212: 210: 206: 205: 200: 196: 193: 190: 186: 182: 179: 176: 173: 172:ScienceDirect 170: 167: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 137: 134: 130: 124: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2663: 2630: 2614:76.112.35.87 2610: 2571: 2570: 2563: 2541: 2518: 2508: 2485: 2475: 2456: 2442: 2414:— Preceding 2409: 2405: 2366: 2343:— Preceding 2340: 2321:AusLondonder 2296: 2276: 2243:66.177.14.35 2237:— Preceding 2234: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2183:Dried cherry 2179: 2171: 2169: 2162: 2154: 2150: 2148: 2129:Dried cherry 2110: 2103: 2100: 2089: 2013: 2006: 1973: 1966: 1948:cite journal 1938:27 September 1936:. Retrieved 1932: 1922: 1913: 1907: 1895:. Retrieved 1891: 1881: 1872: 1863: 1856: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1802: 1779: 1773: 1770: 1373: 1370:martial arts 1358:water skiing 1351: 1339: 1311: 1278: 1267: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1183: 1068:— Preceding 1054: 1050: 985: 958: 953: 948: 944: 890: 886: 873: 850:— Preceding 846: 827: 821: 818: 814: 789: 745: 680: 636: 587: 555: 541: 476: 436: 380:WikiProjects 348: 331: 312: 307:July 8, 2010 277:reassessment 275: 260: 259: 255: 207: 194: 188: 180: 174: 168: 162: 154: 146: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2688:Grunzus-Sat 2151:Middle Ages 2149:During the 2046:|publisher= 1703:Sue Rangell 1486:POV pushing 1342:dress codes 333:Peer review 272:renominated 31:not a forum 2720:Categories 1897:24 October 1374:barefooter 1366:gymnastics 1187:Mandolamus 1185:the home? 1051:in any way 968:fallacious 319:Not listed 2420:Bassman21 2060:QuentinUK 2036:cite book 2021:. p. 34. 1992:cite book 1836:discalced 1832:discalced 1805:discalced 1761:Discalced 1270:frostbite 452:Sociology 443:sociology 399:Sociology 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2646:Peaceray 2428:contribs 2416:unsigned 2345:unsigned 2239:unsigned 2106:hookworm 1828:barefoot 1082:contribs 1070:unsigned 1030:contribs 1021:Araignee 919:contribs 910:Araignee 852:unsigned 824:unsigned 756:naturism 563:Medicine 504:Medicine 338:Reviewed 256:Barefoot 209:Archives 178:Springer 143:Cochrane 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 25:Barefoot 2371:editor 1742:Hadashi 1725:Hadashi 1650:Hadashi 1631:WP:LEAD 1627:WP:NPOV 1613:Hadashi 1609:WP:LEAD 1574:Hadashi 1490:WP:LEAD 1434:Hadashi 1354:running 1282:bunions 1115:Hadashi 954:exactly 949:nothing 887:natural 830:Carinya 792:on the 683:on the 590:on the 479:on the 370:B-class 297:Process 2703:DMacks 2591:DMacks 2363:Images 1763:merger 1737:Also, 1405:WP:COI 1368:, and 891:normal 765:Nudity 752:nudity 708:Nudity 643:health 376:scale. 300:Result 258:was a 166:OpenMD 136:PubMed 1525:WP:RS 1520:WP:RS 959:needs 889:with 192:Wiley 84:Seek 2707:talk 2692:talk 2673:and 2650:talk 2618:talk 2595:talk 2548:talk 2529:talk 2496:talk 2463:talk 2424:talk 2391:talk 2353:talk 2325:talk 2317:talk 2315:Hi, 2304:talk 2284:talk 2263:talk 2247:talk 2208:talk 2187:talk 2133:talk 2117:talk 2079:talk 2064:talk 2051:help 2023:ISBN 1998:link 1979:ISBN 1958:link 1954:link 1940:2012 1899:2012 1848:talk 1817:talk 1813:WTF? 1790:talk 1786:WTF? 1746:talk 1729:talk 1670:talk 1666:WTF? 1654:talk 1639:talk 1635:WTF? 1617:talk 1598:talk 1594:WTF? 1578:talk 1533:talk 1529:WTF? 1438:talk 1413:talk 1409:WTF? 1327:talk 1323:WTF? 1313:leg. 1299:talk 1295:WTF? 1258:talk 1254:WTF? 1219:talk 1191:talk 1158:talk 1154:WTF? 1119:talk 1078:talk 1026:talk 998:talk 976:talk 915:talk 899:talk 895:Dmol 860:talk 834:talk 754:and 645:and 294:Date 185:Trip 159:Gale 151:DOAJ 73:and 2523:. — 2490:. — 2232:/s 1380:or 1040:-- 957:it 945:not 784:Mid 675:Low 582:Low 471:Low 199:TWL 2722:: 2709:) 2694:) 2652:) 2644:. 2631:is 2620:) 2597:) 2550:) 2531:) 2498:) 2465:) 2457:-- 2430:) 2426:• 2369:To 2355:) 2327:) 2306:) 2286:) 2265:) 2249:) 2189:) 2135:) 2119:) 2081:) 2066:) 2040:: 2038:}} 2034:{{ 2017:. 1994:}} 1990:{{ 1950:}} 1946:{{ 1931:. 1890:. 1850:) 1819:) 1811:. 1792:) 1748:) 1731:) 1672:) 1656:) 1641:) 1619:) 1600:) 1580:) 1535:) 1440:) 1415:) 1407:. 1364:, 1360:, 1356:, 1329:) 1301:) 1260:) 1221:) 1213:-- 1193:) 1160:) 1121:) 1084:) 1080:• 1061:, 1028:• 1000:) 978:) 917:• 901:) 862:) 836:) 220:, 216:, 54:; 2705:( 2690:( 2648:( 2616:( 2593:( 2577:. 2572:O 2567:. 2546:( 2527:( 2494:( 2461:( 2422:( 2394:) 2388:( 2375:: 2351:( 2323:( 2302:( 2282:( 2261:( 2245:( 2211:) 2205:( 2185:( 2131:( 2115:( 2077:( 2062:( 2053:) 2049:( 2030:. 2000:) 1986:. 1960:) 1942:. 1901:. 1875:. 1865:^ 1846:( 1815:( 1788:( 1744:( 1727:( 1668:( 1652:( 1637:( 1615:( 1596:( 1576:( 1531:( 1436:( 1411:( 1384:. 1325:( 1297:( 1256:( 1217:( 1189:( 1156:( 1117:( 1076:( 1032:) 1024:( 996:( 974:( 921:) 913:( 908:~ 897:( 858:( 832:( 796:. 687:. 594:. 560:. 483:. 382:: 222:3 218:2 214:1 211:: 195:· 189:· 181:· 175:· 169:· 163:· 155:· 147:· 139:· 133:· 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index