347:. While I disagree with ComplexRational claim to OR, the topic of the article is already covered at the list of number systems. Still, there isn't substantial content worth merging here that isn't covered there, as Base 11 was never really notable in its own right, and a redirect would not work either. So in the end, it isn't that there are no sources or that original research is present, but that the topic is extremely insignificant and does not possess any coverage besides routine definitions. So delete.
438:. Unless base 11 was ever used on a significant scale -- which I highly doubt, given the practical issues -- there's no more reason to have an article about it than about base 13, base 17, or any other impractical numeral system. It's also worth noting that we don't have (or, IMO, need) an article for base 7, even though it's both a lower number and at least indirectly used for days of the week.
415:(link is to their site; it's a synopsis of multiplication tables for all bases between 2 and 60 inclusive), so it's not quite OR. OTOH, for bases 12 and above they use the author's self-created transdecimal numerals, the DSA has switched to Pitman numerals (in which digit-10 is an inverted 2, not an X-like shape), and the DSA is hardly advocating use of undecimal!
383:]. Unreliable source from Quora. Apparently "X" was chosen as it was the Roman numeral for ten, which kind of makes sense, but the information is still not verifiable. However, it DID come from somewhere. Delete still stands. I can see why you would call it OR though, as a controversial claim without a citation. In all honesty, you were probably right.
476:
apply here. Does this base have multiple interesting properties distinguishing it, in its use as a base from other bases? No. Does it have any significant historical or cultural use? Not really, except as the punchline of a joke. The ISBN checksum has been claimed to be base-11, but it's not really
314:, there is no content suitable for merging. I cannot find many sources detailing the subject that may be used to expand this article (there really is only one aspect – the bit about the French Revolution – that has been covered, but is only two sentences that already exist in
206:
464:
159:
200:
283:
265:- this article is only two sentences long, and does not say much other than stating the obvious. It is badly written - "a addition" should be "an addition".
106:
132:
127:
91:
136:
519:- The article is short, uncited, badly written and the subject has no more reason to have its own page than any other impractical numeral system. —
166:
119:
221:
188:
86:
79:
17:
368:
The bit about using X (dek) as a digit for 10 is what struck me as OR, by the way. But I agree with this viewpoint as well.
443:
182:
556:
528:
511:
486:
447:
424:
392:
377:
356:
339:
295:
274:
256:
100:
96:
61:
412:
178:
573:
499:
373:
335:
123:
40:
482:
439:
291:
228:
552:
538:
534:
315:
252:
238:
115:
67:
507:
420:
569:
460:
36:
406:
369:
331:
194:
524:
478:
287:
214:
547:
247:
498:
identifications of languages as base-11 (Pañgwa and Maori in 1922 and 1826(!) respectively, see
503:
416:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
568:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
494:. Apart from the joke, AFAIK the only claims to notability for this base are two historical
473:
456:
388:
352:
270:
57:
477:— there's a calculation mod 11, but no use of 11 as an actual radix for base-11 notation. —
520:
319:
307:
153:
399:
384:
363:
348:
266:
53:
311:
322:. Additionally, the title is rather wordy and thus not ideal for a redirect;
323:
327:
502:
by Harald
Hammarström on rarities in numeral systems), i.e. not much.
472:. I think the same principles that apply to individual numbers in
411:
Using
Dwiggins X (dek) for the last undecimal digit was done by
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
455:
No indication that this merits more than a line in a table.
149:
145:
141:
213:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
576:). No further edits should be made to this page.
284:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
227:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
306:. As this article is uncited and possibly
281:
241:. No need to merge because it's a stub.
7:
24:
330:suffice for that. Hence, delete.
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
557:18:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
529:14:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
512:03:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
487:01:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
465:00:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
448:04:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
425:03:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
413:the Dozenal Society of America
393:00:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
378:10:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
357:01:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
340:20:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
296:09:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
275:06:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
257:02:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
62:04:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
593:
541:would have to be deleted.
566:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
318:), so I'd say it fails
316:List of numeral systems
239:List of numeral systems
539:Base 11 numeral system
535:Base 11 Numeral System
116:Base 11 Numeral System
68:Base 11 Numeral System
80:Articles for deletion
237:Already stated in
298:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
584:
555:
554:
410:
403:
367:
255:
254:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
592:
591:
587:
586:
585:
583:
582:
581:
580:
574:deletion review
543:
542:
407:ComplexRational
404:
397:
370:ComplexRational
361:
332:ComplexRational
243:
242:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
590:
588:
579:
578:
560:
559:
531:
514:
489:
479:David Eppstein
467:
450:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
342:
300:
299:
288:Tracy Von Doom
278:
277:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
589:
577:
575:
571:
567:
562:
561:
558:
553:
551:
550:
549:AnUnnamedUser
546:
540:
536:
532:
530:
526:
522:
518:
515:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
488:
484:
480:
475:
471:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
426:
422:
418:
414:
408:
401:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
365:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:derived from
309:
305:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
253:
251:
250:
249:AnUnnamedUser
246:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
565:
563:
548:
544:
516:
504:Double sharp
495:
491:
469:
452:
435:
417:Double sharp
344:
303:
262:
248:
244:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
201:free images
500:this paper
457:XOR'easter
440:❃Adelaide❃
312:duodecimal
570:talk page
521:Kstone999
474:WP:NUMBER
324:undecimal
37:talk page
572:or in a
496:mistaken
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
328:base 11
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
517:Delete
492:Delete
470:Delete
453:Delete
436:Delete
400:Utopes
385:Utopes
364:Utopes
349:Utopes
345:Delete
320:WP:GNG
304:Delete
267:Vorbee
263:Delete
179:Google
137:delete
54:RL0919
50:delete
533:Both
308:WP:OR
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
545:From
537:and
525:talk
508:talk
483:talk
461:talk
444:talk
421:talk
389:talk
374:talk
353:talk
336:talk
326:and
292:talk
271:talk
245:From
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
229:TWL
158:– (
527:)
510:)
485:)
463:)
446:)
423:)
391:)
376:)
355:)
338:)
294:)
286:.
273:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
523:(
506:(
481:(
459:(
442:(
419:(
409::
405:@
402::
398:@
387:(
372:(
366::
362:@
351:(
334:(
290:(
269:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.