835:, not at all, because it's clear she already has jumped the hurdle for secondary coverage. I can understand not wanting to break out a joint accomplishment or project into an individual one, but just based on a cursory search, she's the mouthpiece of City Bureau, has been since it started, and is now the executive director. Personally, because she's a journalist of color in an
585:
528:
486:
404:
376:
368:
320:
578:
571:
543:
500:
462:
447:
419:
313:
870:
None of the things you mention are accepted thresholds or criteria for notability, though. A Google search for her name yields mostly pieces written by her, which are not appropriate for establishing notability, so Iâm not sure what youâre referring to with that. Similarly, a high-level role in a
827:) â and rearranged and better supported elements of the bio which could have been expressed more thoroughly from the works being cited, which was more from a general readability standpoint than a notability one. The idea that Chang isn't notable even despite the
669:
Thanks for the discussion. The article now has 13 independent citations about the notability of Chang's work, including the
Columbia Journalism Review, NiemanLab and Politico. I believe this shows that the subject meets the thresholds for notability.
871:ânonprofit newsroomâ doesnât necessarily indicate notability for our purposes. You mention that she has âalready jumped the hurdle for secondary coverageâ; what sources are you referring to here? Itâd be great if you could provide your
210:
1058:
I removed reference 1 as its non-rs. An unreliable source. That is the first two references blocks covered. So in combination with the source analysis table above, it is plain to see there is not a single
165:
280:
305:
253:
thresholds for notability. Only one of the sources in the article might be a GNG source (see assessment table below), and I was not able to find any better sources myself.
633:
204:
637:
795:
article seems to be a well-supported target and this would preserve the article history; if content is copied from this article, it can be attributed according to
723:
629:
754:
687:
112:
749:
is shared with the other City Bureau founders, and the other cited accolades do not appear to contribute much to notability. Her notable work seems more
97:
605:
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using
625:
520:
306:
https://medium.com/innsights/how-three-women-journalist-leaders-channeled-legacy-newsroom-experiences-into-creating-healthier-d788a935e385
942:
138:
133:
478:
735:
351:
142:
738:
439:
92:
85:
17:
125:
225:
192:
609:
169:
106:
102:
988:
959:
892:
769:#3, and independent coverage of Chang in available sources, including based on my own search, seems too limited to
753:
of the City Bureau article; coverage in
Politico, CFR, and Nieman Reports, as well as a Rising Star award from the
1142:
40:
1063:
source amongst the lot. This is therefore delete. There is barely even a primary source. Chang is non-notable.
741:
is independent, reliable, and secondary support for her notability, but usage in the article is limited by the
186:
946:
285:
521:
https://www.newslaundry.com/2019/11/04/the-media-rumble-interview-bettina-chang-on-collaborative-journalism
1125:
1098:
1094:
1073:
1011:
977:
933:
912:
879:
865:
862:
808:
782:
696:
679:
662:
644:
257:
182:
67:
1138:
929:
832:
36:
1043:
Ref 9 Unable to see this properly on newspapers.com but seem from the size its another passing mention.
938:
796:
766:
750:
719:
290:
232:
727:
1060:
840:
742:
731:
658:
218:
396:
1120:
804:
778:
129:
479:
https://www.ted.com/talks/bettina_chang_maslow_s_pyramid_fake_news_and_the_future_of_journalism
1090:
1024:
851:
675:
352:
https://robertfeder.dailyherald.com/2019/05/10/powerful-women-chicago-journalism-2019-edition/
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1137:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1066:
1007:
973:
876:
641:
440:
https://niemanreports.org/articles/how-journalists-of-color-are-redefining-newsroom-culture/
323:
254:
726:
source has a focus on City Bureau, with some interview and observation of her at work; the
198:
872:
715:
246:
824:. I say this just having done a rewrite of the article â which can be checked out here (
653:: Based on the source assessment table, nothing for notability. I can't find much else.
828:
770:
691:
654:
1115:
1111:
1086:
925:
905:
800:
774:
296:
250:
121:
73:
839:
role for a remarkably successful nonprofit newsroom (that was the first of its kind
671:
159:
1107:
1003:
969:
792:
711:
242:
53:
734:
seem similar in focus on City Bureau with brief quotes from her; I think the
746:
563:
58:
831:-ness of it all is a little ridiculous to me. I'm not pulling a
1133:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:
https://www.taiwaneseamerican.org/next100/people/bettina-chang/
991:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
962:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
895:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
722:, and content that could be moved from her article. The 2019
757:
does not seem to sufficient to establish City Bureau as a
825:
155:
151:
147:
217:
333:
Almost nothing except for direct quotations from her
1002:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
968:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
901:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
457:Published in Opinion section, reliability unclear
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1145:). No further edits should be made to this page.
686:Note: This discussion has been included in the
624:Note: This discussion has been included in the
791:I updated my !vote to a redirect, because the
231:
8:
113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
936:
688:list of Women-related deletion discussions
685:
623:
264:
1037:Ref 5 states it edited by Betttina Chang
262:Source assessment table by Actualcpscm:
762:
758:
564:https://www.rcfp.org/awardsdinner2019/
820:into City Bureau, but my vote is for
7:
751:effectively presented in the context
714:for now based on available sources,
1114:. The subject is mentioned there.
24:
1040:Ref 8 Is another passing mention.
628:lists for the following topics:
583:
576:
569:
541:
526:
498:
484:
460:
445:
417:
402:
374:
366:
318:
311:
98:Introduction to deletion process
1110:as a plausible search term per
1046:Ref 10 Another passing mention.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
759:significant or well-known work
1:
1126:00:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
1099:11:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
1074:12:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
1012:00:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
842:), I'm still a pretty strong
809:03:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
771:develop a reasonably balanced
68:00:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
978:10:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
934:17:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
913:02:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
880:08:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
866:04:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
783:18:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
697:15:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
680:15:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
663:15:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
645:14:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
258:14:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
1052:Ref 12 Nothing here either.
1034:Ref 1 is a passing mention.
577:
570:
542:
499:
461:
446:
418:
312:
88:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1162:
584:
527:
485:
403:
375:
367:
319:
603:
270:Source assessment table:
267:
1135:Please do not modify it.
837:executive and co-founder
773:biography at this time.
32:Please do not modify it.
1023:There is an attempt at
763:collective body of work
846:. I'm a much stronger
818:At bare minimum, merge
170:edits since nomination
291:Significant coverage?
86:Articles for deletion
1049:Ref 11 nothing here.
295:Count source toward
739:2018 opinion source
610:source assess table
997:Relisting comment:
1014:
980:
950:
941:comment added by
915:
724:Politico Magazine
699:
647:
620:
619:
616:
566:
523:
481:
442:
399:
354:
308:
103:Guide to deletion
93:How to contribute
1153:
1123:
1118:
1085:Doesn't satisfy
1071:
1069:
1027:Lets look at it.
1001:
994:
992:
967:
965:
963:
900:
898:
896:
860:
857:
854:
694:
626:deletion sorting
614:
608:
604:
596:
595:
587:
586:
580:
579:
573:
572:
562:
554:
553:
545:
544:
538:
530:
529:
519:
511:
510:
502:
501:
495:
488:
487:
477:
470:
464:
463:
456:
449:
448:
438:
430:
429:
421:
420:
414:
406:
405:
395:
387:
386:
378:
377:
370:
369:
363:
362:
350:
342:
341:
332:
322:
321:
315:
314:
304:
265:
245:. Does not meet
236:
235:
221:
163:
145:
83:
66:
34:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1143:deletion review
1121:
1116:
1067:
1065:
987:
985:
958:
956:
904:
891:
889:
858:
855:
852:
747:2019 RCFP award
745:guideline; the
732:2019 CJR source
728:2016 CJR source
709:
692:
612:
606:
591:
590:
549:
548:
534:
506:
505:
491:
468:
452:
425:
424:
410:
382:
381:
358:
357:
337:
336:
328:
272:
178:
136:
120:
117:
80:
77:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1159:
1157:
1148:
1147:
1129:
1128:
1101:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1017:
1016:
1000:
995:
982:
966:
952:
951:
918:
917:
902:
899:
885:
884:
883:
882:
833:WP:CRYSTALBALL
814:
813:
812:
811:
786:
785:
736:Nieman Reports
705:
700:
668:
666:
665:
648:
618:
617:
601:
600:
588:
581:
574:
567:
559:
558:
546:
539:
532:
524:
516:
515:
503:
496:
489:
482:
474:
473:
465:
458:
450:
443:
435:
434:
422:
415:
408:
400:
392:
391:
379:
372:
371:Personal blog
364:
355:
347:
346:
334:
326:
316:
309:
301:
300:
293:
288:
283:
278:
274:
273:
268:
239:
238:
174:
173:
116:
115:
110:
100:
95:
78:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1158:
1146:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1119:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1062:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1009:
1005:
999:Final relist.
998:
993:
990:
983:
981:
979:
975:
971:
964:
961:
954:
953:
948:
944:
943:96.246.158.82
940:
935:
931:
927:
923:
920:
919:
916:
914:
911:
910:
909:
897:
894:
887:
886:
881:
878:
874:
869:
868:
867:
864:
861:
849:
845:
841:
838:
834:
830:
826:
823:
819:
816:
815:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:WP:COPYWITHIN
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:WP:JOURNALIST
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:WP:JOURNALIST
717:
713:
708:
704:
701:
698:
695:
689:
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
646:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
611:
602:
599:
594:
589:
582:
575:
568:
565:
561:
560:
557:
552:
547:
540:
537:
533:
525:
522:
518:
517:
514:
509:
504:
497:
494:
490:
483:
480:
476:
475:
472:
466:
459:
455:
451:
444:
441:
437:
436:
433:
428:
423:
416:
413:
409:
401:
398:
394:
393:
390:
385:
380:
373:
365:
361:
356:
353:
349:
348:
345:
340:
335:
331:
327:
325:
317:
310:
307:
303:
302:
298:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
282:
279:
276:
275:
271:
266:
263:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
234:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
180:Find sources:
176:
175:
171:
167:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:Bettina Chang
119:
118:
114:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
82:
75:
74:Bettina Chang
72:
70:
69:
65:
63:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1134:
1132:
1103:
1091:MaskedSinger
1082:
1077:
1064:
1061:WP:SECONDARY
1057:
1020:
996:
986:
984:
957:
955:
937:â Preceding
921:
907:
906:
890:
888:
848:don't delete
847:
843:
836:
821:
817:
743:WP:RSOPINION
706:
702:
667:
650:
597:
592:
555:
550:
535:
512:
507:
492:
467:
453:
431:
426:
411:
388:
383:
359:
343:
338:
329:
281:Independent?
269:
261:
240:
228:
222:
214:
207:
201:
195:
189:
179:
79:
60:
59:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1108:City Bureau
1078:2023 (UTC)
1068:scope_creep
877:Actualcpscm
793:City Bureau
712:City Bureau
642:Actualcpscm
255:Actualcpscm
205:free images
54:City Bureau
1025:WP:HEYMANN
634:Journalism
531:Interview
407:Interview
1139:talk page
693:Spiderone
655:Oaktree b
324:WP:MEDIUM
286:Reliable?
37:talk page
1141:or in a
1104:Redirect
989:Relisted
960:Relisted
939:unsigned
908:Rosguill
903:signed,
893:Relisted
873:WP:THREE
801:Beccaynr
775:Beccaynr
716:WP:BASIC
707:Redirect
638:Illinois
247:WP:BASIC
166:View log
107:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
829:WP:GOOG
672:Angshah
636:, and
471:Partial
277:Source
243:notable
211:WPÂ refs
199:scholar
139:protect
134:history
84:New to
1122:plicit
1112:WP:ATD
1087:WP:GNG
1083:Delete
1021:Delete
1004:Daniel
970:Daniel
761:nor a
651:Delete
630:People
251:WP:GNG
183:Google
143:delete
926:Dunny
703:Merge
226:JSTOR
187:books
160:views
152:watch
148:links
52:â to
16:<
1095:talk
1008:talk
974:talk
947:talk
930:talk
922:keep
844:keep
822:keep
805:talk
779:talk
765:per
755:RCFP
730:and
718:and
676:talk
659:talk
241:Not
219:FENS
193:news
156:logs
130:talk
126:edit
1106:to
850:.
710:to
297:GNG
249:or
233:TWL
164:â (
1097:)
1010:)
976:)
949:)
932:)
924:--
875:.
863:đŹ
807:)
799:.
781:)
690:.
678:)
670:--
661:)
640:.
632:,
613:}}
607:{{
598:No
556:No
513:No
432:No
389:No
344:No
299:?
213:)
168:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
64:iz
56:.
1117:â
1093:(
1089:.
1006:(
972:(
945:(
928:(
859:É
856:É
853:ÉŻ
803:(
777:(
674:(
657:(
615:.
593:â
551:â
536:~
508:â
493:~
469:~
454:~
427:â
412:~
384:â
360:?
339:â
330:~
237:)
229:¡
223:¡
215:¡
208:¡
202:¡
196:¡
190:¡
185:(
177:(
172:)
162:)
124:(
109:)
105:(
61:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.