307:
areas. Although the custom search for the project has two pages of hits, I found them to be empty directory listings (or invalid hits to the Times about other topics). Metacritic lists zero sources, reliable OR unreliable, with no critic reviews ever submitted, and not even any user reviews. GameSpot
316:
has two short articles without a writer byline, nothing indepth, and pre-release. And that's about all I could actually find. There is of course the old GameSpy preview, which looks deceptively like it may have kinda been almost an interview, but that's before release and even if it helps with WP:N,
251:
Clearly a COI article that only serves to promote the subject. Out of the 14 sources on the article, 2 are screenshots of the game, an about us page, press release, source code / binaries, repositories but hardly any significant third party indepth coverage that clears the burden of
220:
82:
260:
87:
283:
181:
214:
77:
128:
113:
312:
has what appears to be a substantial text block describing the game, but is an encyclopedic/directory entry as well, with no score or actual review.
259:
Not surprisingly, this article was deleted 4 times previously and eventually salted. After it's current recreation, it was again nominated for
263:, however due to many SPA editors, the debate resulted in "no consensus". Nearly all keep votes were from SPAs that signed up to "vote".
154:
149:
158:
343:
326:
292:
275:
61:
141:
108:
101:
17:
235:
339:
202:
122:
118:
372:
335:
196:
40:
192:
145:
266:
I think it is time to delete this article now because it is not really eligible for wikipedia in anyway.
368:
36:
242:
137:
67:
228:
352:
313:
271:
97:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
367:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
208:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
322:
57:
309:
304:
287:
267:
253:
175:
318:
53:
308:
has a directory listing with some user reviews, but no publication review.
317:
it's a single source. They didn't bother to do a review after release. --
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
351:
per nom. Could be relevant but article must be improved.
171:
167:
163:
227:
83:
Articles for deletion/Beyond
Protocol (2nd nomination)
88:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol (video game)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:). No further edits should be made to this page.
284:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
241:
8:
129:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
303:Attempted to search for sources from usual
281:
75:
78:Articles for deletion/Beyond Protocol
7:
24:
114:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
344:21:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
327:14:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
293:13:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
276:12:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
104:(AfD)? Read these primers!
62:13:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
392:
357:5:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
365:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
102:Articles for deletion
336:Trainsandotherthings
334:per nom and above.
261:AFD in this debate
295:
119:Guide to deletion
109:How to contribute
383:
355:
290:
246:
245:
231:
179:
161:
99:
34:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:deletion review
353:
288:
188:
152:
138:Beyond Protocol
136:
133:
96:
93:
92:
71:
68:Beyond Protocol
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
378:
377:
359:
358:
346:
329:
297:
296:
249:
248:
185:
132:
131:
126:
116:
111:
94:
91:
90:
85:
80:
74:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
376:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
356:
354:GamedevExpert
350:
347:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
315:
311:
306:
302:
299:
298:
294:
291:
285:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
264:
262:
257:
255:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
190:Find sources:
186:
183:
177:
173:
169:
165:
160:
156:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:
130:
127:
124:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
106:
105:
103:
98:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
364:
362:
348:
331:
300:
265:
258:
250:
238:
232:
224:
217:
211:
205:
199:
189:
95:
49:
47:
31:
28:
215:free images
310:Gry-Online
369:talk page
314:Jeuxvideo
289:Spiderone
37:talk page
371:or in a
268:Drewziii
182:View log
123:glossary
39:or in a
305:WP:VG/S
221:WP refs
209:scholar
155:protect
150:history
100:New to
349:Delete
332:Delete
319:ferret
301:Delete
254:WP:GNG
193:Google
159:delete
54:RL0919
50:delete
236:JSTOR
197:books
176:views
168:watch
164:links
16:<
340:talk
323:talk
272:talk
229:FENS
203:news
172:logs
146:talk
142:edit
58:talk
243:TWL
180:– (
342:)
325:)
286:.
274:)
256:.
223:)
174:|
170:|
166:|
162:|
157:|
153:|
148:|
144:|
60:)
52:.
338:(
321:(
270:(
247:)
239:·
233:·
225:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
195:(
187:(
184:)
178:)
140:(
125:)
121:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.