489:
sources fail to directly address the critical issues I laid above — namely the fact that Mr/Mrs
Gatteys, is not a notable actor under the applicable wikipedia guidelines referenced above. While she has had the occasional bit part in an old TV sitcom, and has apparently appeared as a contestant in a Game show, this does not rise to the general notability guideline nor therefore the notability guideline specifically crafted for television and film performers. Not every extra who appears on an ep of the Outer Limits is automatically notable, nor too is every game show contestant with trifling winnings. I have done an extensive search through the primary sources provided and they singularly fail to meet our guidelines, which would be apparent to anyone who reviewed them in any detail before submitting.
259:. I recommend that this article be deleted, a recommendation that I do not make lightly but feel forced to make as this article has been up here for over 1.5 to 2 years without being significantly improved and my own attempts at finding additional verification of notability or additional sources to strengthen this article have been politely rebuffed by reality.
364:!! It’s glad to see that some of us can see sense on this topic without being colored by too much emotion. It is clear that this, like many articles. Was built siolely on the spine of an IMDB reference and then only hastily had sources submitted in a good faith but misaimed attempt to cover up the lack of
323:
of biographical articles on actors and actresses at present where the only source at all is IMDb. There is a huge field open to either nominate those articles for deletion or find some source other than IMDb. Knowledge (XXG) should not be an IMDB mirror, but we have far too many articles that seem to
250:
or even ]. To wit, the three criteria laid out above were not met in any way; there are no significant roles in notable films or television series; the actress/actor has no cult following, and has made neither unique nor common contributions to the medium of acting. Furthermore, the majority of the
488:
It’s interesting that all these folks are suddenly popping out of the woodwork to save this article now after it was left in a largely unsourced rumor filled mess for over a year... I wonder what prompted this? Anyway, I commend the user above for adding additional reliable sources. However, these
428:
ETA: Have now updated article such that it includes 8 references from several decades, including several profiles entirely about the subject. Most of the articles include photos. I am updating my vote to SPEEDY KEEP because the nominator's argument about notability is clearly not correct. (Please,
511:
Re: "popping out of the woodwork". What prompted this is the fact that the article has been nominated for deletion. You do realize that the AFD process is designed to send alerts out in various forms to various interested parties, so they can come comment on the nomination, right? Nothing more
462:
for reaching out to me as well for doing the hard work of collating and improving this article! I really appreciate your help! In addition, when it comes to the deletion criteria, I took a look and I agree that it meets the standard for notability referenced above. Specifically, she has had
471:. I am not sure if that is enough though -- does the actress have to meet ALL three of the requirements (significant roles in notable TV/films; a cult following; and unique contributions to the film industry as a whole) or is it enough that she meets just one of them?
527:
that I monitor, and as I said I was able to very quickly determine that the article was worth saving, and add the necessary sources. All told it took just over an hour on newspaper.com to fix the article - exactly what
211:
276:
164:
410:
search (see B.2. and D in that guide)? In just two minutes on newspapers.com I've come up with several good sources on her, which I am going to add to the article now. --
205:
342:
296:
247:
96:
433:
searches before nominating, and not just on Google. It saves lots of stress. If you don't have accounts on 'deep web' sites like newspapers.com, please see
111:
242:
This article appears to be, at best, a vanity project for a minor, non-notable actor. This article fails miserably to meet even the minimal standards of
556:
171:
576:- the sources added since the nomination shows that the subject meets the notability guidelines. Kudsos to Krelnik for adding the sources. --
434:
383:
Then you misunderstand our notability guidelines. They are there precisely to ensure that a reliable, verifiable, article can be written.
137:
132:
91:
84:
17:
141:
372:. That’s not how it works though — a topic must have both notability and reliable, verifiable content — not one or the other...
124:
226:
105:
101:
193:
641:
40:
524:
523:
via item 1. I frankly had never heard of this person before today, but I noticed the deletion notice on one of the
555:. I have reviewed the sources provided, as suggested by the nominator. and find them to demonstrate a pass of the
255:, which is the equivalent of citing another Knowledge (XXG) article and does not rise to the standard laid out in
329:
187:
350:
624:
603:
585:
568:
541:
498:
480:
446:
419:
392:
365:
354:
333:
308:
288:
268:
183:
66:
564:
388:
637:
599:
36:
464:
233:
361:
325:
494:
377:
264:
219:
128:
529:
430:
407:
620:
346:
61:
612:
594:
472:
53:
560:
537:
468:
442:
415:
384:
304:
284:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
636:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
611:
Agreed. Krelnik has been very helpful. We now seem to have consensus that the subject meets
251:
sources used in the article are dubious or deficient, mostly pulling from the non-verifiable
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
319:
The one semi-reliable source does not propel this subject to notability. That said, we have
199:
520:
516:
476:
369:
256:
581:
559:. Folks are not "popping out of the woodwork" but reacting to the deletion nomination.
490:
373:
260:
120:
72:
243:
616:
533:
459:
438:
411:
300:
280:
158:
577:
515:
As I said, I disagree with your assessment of notability. She clearly meets
463:"significant roles in notable films or television series", in particular
252:
632:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
277:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
154:
150:
146:
218:
232:
52:. The consensus has decided that the subject meets
248:Knowledge (XXG):The GNG and notability for actors
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
644:). No further edits should be made to this page.
406:Has anyone reading this bothered to do a proper
341:Note: This discussion has been included in the
295:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
343:list of Women-related deletion discussions
340:
297:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
294:
274:
593:– Per a source review, the subject meets
324:have been directly copied from that site.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
532:recommends nominators do first. --
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
437:which will provide you one). --
1:
557:general notability guideline
435:The Knowledge (XXG) Library
429:please, please do in-depth
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
661:
368:with an over abundance of
625:13:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
604:11:35, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
586:17:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
569:17:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
542:19:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
499:17:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
481:17:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
447:15:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
420:13:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
393:17:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
355:07:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
334:21:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
309:08:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
289:08:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
269:22:31, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
67:15:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
634:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:Articles for deletion
362:User:Johnpacklambert
519:and she also meets
512:sinister than that.
58:(non-admin closure)
486:Nominator comment
469:Days Of Our Lives
360:Strongly concur,
357:
326:John Pack Lambert
311:
291:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
60:
652:
602:
465:Look Up And Live
237:
236:
222:
174:
162:
144:
82:
56:
34:
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
648:
642:deletion review
598:
179:
170:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
658:
656:
647:
646:
628:
627:
606:
588:
571:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
525:article alerts
513:
504:
503:
502:
501:
452:
451:
450:
449:
423:
422:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
337:
336:
313:
312:
292:
246:as defined in
240:
239:
176:
121:Bennye Gatteys
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
73:Bennye Gatteys
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
645:
643:
639:
635:
630:
629:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
605:
601:
600:North America
596:
592:
589:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
550:
543:
539:
535:
531:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
500:
496:
492:
487:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
457:
454:
453:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
401:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
366:WP:Notability
363:
359:
358:
356:
352:
348:
347:Coolabahapple
344:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
322:
318:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
245:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
173:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
64:
63:AmericanAir88
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
633:
631:
608:
590:
573:
561:Phil Bridger
552:
485:
460:User:Krelnik
455:
403:
385:Phil Bridger
320:
316:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
167:
78:
62:
49:
47:
31:
28:
404:Speedy Keep
206:free images
458:Thank you
638:talk page
530:WP:BEFORE
491:Michepman
431:WP:BEFORE
408:WP:BEFORE
374:Michepman
261:Michepman
37:talk page
640:or in a
617:Ret.Prof
613:WP:BASIC
595:WP:BASIC
165:View log
106:glossary
54:WP:BASIC
39:or in a
534:Krelnik
439:Krelnik
412:Krelnik
301:Icewhiz
281:Icewhiz
212:WP refs
200:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
521:WP:ENT
517:WP:GNG
317:Delete
184:Google
142:delete
609:Keep:
473:Alicb
370:WP:RS
257:WP:RS
227:JSTOR
188:books
172:Stats
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
621:talk
615:. -
591:Keep
582:talk
578:Whpq
574:Keep
565:talk
553:Keep
538:talk
495:talk
477:talk
467:and
456:Keep
443:talk
416:talk
389:talk
378:talk
351:talk
330:talk
321:lots
305:talk
285:talk
265:talk
253:IMDB
244:WP:N
220:FENS
194:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
50:keep
234:TWL
163:– (
623:)
597:.
584:)
567:)
540:)
497:)
479:)
445:)
418:)
391:)
380:)
353:)
345:.
332:)
307:)
299:.
287:)
279:.
267:)
214:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
619:(
580:(
563:(
536:(
493:(
475:(
441:(
414:(
387:(
376:(
349:(
328:(
303:(
283:(
263:(
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
168:·
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.