553:. At its current state and all the puff taken out from edits of account that may some form of COI from SPA (just look at histories of all the red accounts since 2018), the article barely even meets the GNG for
195:
375:
336:
473:, how are you determining that info is entirely from Bittrex for these sources? Doesn't coverage of inadequacy in reliable sources contribute positively to a case for notability? ~
156:
346:
385:
287:
267:
247:
189:
545:
As nom highlighted, a lot of the coverages are mainly churnalism as they're mainly initiated by interviews with the execs of the article's subject. As the
103:
88:
326:
316:
490:
It can do, if their incompetence is sufficiently notable. Two mentions of failing to get a license doesn't seem enough to swing an article on -
456:
So you've presented two sources that aren't churnalism and might plausibly connote notability, and they're both about
Bittrex's inadequacy -
230:
shows crypto site coverage, but very little in RSes beyond passing mentions. Challenged PROD, but issues not addressed by challenger.
83:
76:
17:
365:
546:
434:
These sources exist because they're about a local millionaire - they don't exist because of notability on
Bittrex's part:
356:
376:
After hackers stole $ 1M in cryptocurrency, Bellevue venture capitalist launched PR blitz against local company he blames
210:
129:
124:
97:
93:
177:
133:
583:
40:
437:
Seattle Times 2020-01-10: local coverage about a local millionaire buying ads, that happen to be against
Bittrex
116:
495:
461:
295:
275:
255:
235:
171:
579:
36:
425:
IBTimes 2019-06-10: literally just from a
Bittrex blog post (and IBTimes is "generally unreliable" per
167:
562:
520:
203:
566:
537:
499:
482:
465:
400:
299:
279:
259:
239:
120:
58:
549:
pointed, the company has failed to secure license, which may also suggest that it fails GNG for
445:
These two might pass, but they're just about
Bittrex's failure to be up to achieving a license:
217:
527:, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/
491:
470:
457:
291:
271:
251:
231:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
578:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
112:
64:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
524:
516:
392:
227:
550:
528:
406:
558:
478:
396:
532:
426:
183:
386:
State reverses ruling on cryptocurrency exchange sued by
Bellevue venture capitalist
405:
These sources are churnalism, based entirely on information from
Bittrex, so fail
150:
474:
54:
337:
Cryptocurrency exchange
Bittrex teams with registered trading venue Rialto
347:
Bittrex virtual currency license rejected by New York financial regulator
440:
Seattle Times 2020-01-14: local coverage of the same local millionaire
487:
By reading the actual articles - they say the info was from
Bittrex.
317:
Crypto exchange
Bittrex warns traders against 'pump and dump' scams
366:
Bittrex Blocks US-based Users From Trading in 32 Cryptocurrencies
327:
Bittrex Gets Bank Agreement to Help You Buy Bitcoin With Dollars
226:
No evidence nor claim of notability. A single RS mention given.
574:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
310:
There is more than just the one currently in the article.
554:
146:
142:
138:
202:
357:Government Enforcement in the Cryptocurrency Space
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
586:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:Bloomberg 2018-05-31: info entirely from Bittrex
286:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
246:Note: This discussion has been included in the
288:list of Washington-related deletion discussions
268:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
422:Reuters 2018-08-23: info entirely from Bittrex
248:list of Business-related deletion discussions
216:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
285:
265:
245:
416:BI 2017-11-29: info entirely from Bittrex
7:
521:in-depth information on the company
24:
429:, so not a source of notability)
89:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
567:22:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
538:20:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
500:16:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
483:15:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
466:09:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
401:20:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
300:12:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
280:12:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
260:12:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
240:12:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
59:08:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
370:International Business Times
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
603:
515:I am unable to locate any
576:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
360:The National Law Review
77:Articles for deletion
517:significant coverage
525:independent content
315:November 29, 2017 "
448:Reuters 2019-04-10
384:January 14, 2020 "
374:January 10, 2020 "
390:The Seattle Times
380:The Seattle Times
335:August 23, 2018 "
302:
282:
262:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
594:
345:April 10, 2019 "
321:Business Insider
221:
220:
206:
154:
136:
74:
34:
602:
601:
597:
596:
595:
593:
592:
591:
590:
584:deletion review
523:and containing
364:June 10, 2019 "
163:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
600:
598:
589:
588:
570:
569:
547:Nat Law Review
540:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
488:
454:
453:
452:
449:
443:
442:
441:
438:
432:
431:
430:
423:
420:
417:
411:
410:
382:
372:
362:
353:
343:
333:
325:May 31, 2018 "
323:
312:
311:
304:
303:
283:
263:
224:
223:
160:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
599:
587:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
539:
536:
535:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
510:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
455:
450:
447:
446:
444:
439:
436:
435:
433:
428:
424:
421:
418:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
391:
387:
383:
381:
377:
373:
371:
367:
363:
361:
358:
355:May 9, 2019 "
354:
352:
348:
344:
342:
338:
334:
332:
328:
324:
322:
318:
314:
313:
309:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
575:
573:
542:
533:
512:
492:David Gerard
471:David Gerard
458:David Gerard
389:
379:
369:
359:
350:
340:
330:
320:
307:
292:David Gerard
272:David Gerard
252:David Gerard
232:David Gerard
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
190:free images
555:WP:ORGCRIT
580:talk page
559:Infogapp1
331:Bloomberg
228:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
582:or in a
551:WP:NCORP
534:HighKing
529:WP:NCORP
407:WP:NCORP
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
351:Reuters
341:Reuters
196:WP refs
184:scholar
130:protect
125:history
113:Bittrex
75:New to
65:Bittrex
543:Delete
513:Delete
427:WP:RSP
168:Google
134:delete
50:delete
519:with
211:JSTOR
172:books
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
563:talk
557:. --
496:talk
479:talk
475:Kvng
462:talk
397:talk
308:Keep
296:talk
276:talk
256:talk
236:talk
204:FENS
178:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
451:NLR
218:TWL
155:– (
565:)
531:.
498:)
481:)
464:)
399:)
388:"
378:"
368:"
349:"
339:"
329:"
319:"
298:)
290:.
278:)
270:.
258:)
250:.
238:)
198:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
561:(
494:(
477:(
460:(
409::
395:(
393:Ҥ
294:(
274:(
254:(
234:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.