Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Bible Review - Knowledge

Source 📝

503:
I looked through those, but found that more than 50% were just hits to different newspapers using the words "bible review" rather than the publication. Those that do mention the publication seem to be doing in only a citation style. I don't see how to write an article about this. I can't even tell if
522:
The 50% where Bible Review, this subject, is used as a source cited by popular newspaper articles on topics. Obviously, there's going to be redundancy, and I have no idea why the Spokesman-Review shows up so often, but there's a decent enough stub here. I suspect the magazine's own archives would
56:. The keep argument was essentially that the publication has been cited in newspapers. Being cited does not of itself meet GNG. No specific source was offered with significant coverage and the analysis of newspaper mentions by jps was not challenged in any meaningful way 204: 508:. I cannot find any sources which explain why its publication stopped, for example. The sources are just not forthcoming for actual article writing, as far as I'm concerned. What sources would you use? 547:
does not apply, as this was not a journal. If the article can be sourced to the newspapers articles mentioned by Jclemens, then it should be kept. In its current form, it lacks any sources.
256: 523:
explain its demise, or maybe BAR does once it gets folded back into there. A merge into BAR isn't a terrible outcome, but I think the evidence supports a standalone short article.
165: 296: 336: 635: 198: 316: 276: 112: 97: 367:
is a defunct journal, been dead for 15 years. There isn't enough here to warrant a stand-alone article. Also seems to be part of a
138: 133: 142: 92: 85: 17: 464: 626:; given what little there is to say about it, it makes more sense to (briefly) cover this there than in a stand-alone page. 219: 125: 186: 451: 426: 622: 605: 505: 447: 421: 392: 106: 102: 53: 513: 344: 324: 304: 284: 264: 244: 582: 669: 40: 648: 180: 485:
a perusal of the Newspapers link shows multiple diverse times this journal was quoted in popular newspapers.
368: 62: 509: 340: 320: 300: 280: 260: 240: 176: 665: 652: 631: 610: 573: 556: 532: 517: 498: 477: 438: 409: 382: 377: 348: 328: 308: 288: 268: 248: 67: 36: 400:
is best treated as a relatively-short-lived offshoot but was never really important in its own right.
434: 226: 644: 212: 552: 544: 528: 494: 486: 460: 236: 57: 371:
that includes the topics linked in the article. Its founder does appear to be notable though. ~
569: 129: 81: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
664:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
489:
is inapplicable, as this was not a scholarly journal but a popular magazine, so GNG applies.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
627: 472: 405: 372: 601: 430: 192: 468: 360: 548: 524: 490: 456: 565: 121: 73: 159: 401: 592: 660:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
585:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
155: 151: 147: 257:
list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions
211: 643:, as it has been cited by newspapers numerous times. 591:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 297:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 672:). No further edits should be made to this page. 337:list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions 335:Note: This discussion has been included in the 315:Note: This discussion has been included in the 295:Note: This discussion has been included in the 275:Note: This discussion has been included in the 255:Note: This discussion has been included in the 225: 8: 317:list of Judaism-related deletion discussions 113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 334: 314: 294: 277:list of Bible-related deletion discussions 274: 254: 239:, I believe. Severely lacking sources. 425:if that article is kept, otherwise to 504:this is a different publication from 7: 24: 98:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 636:21:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC) 611:02:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC) 574:02:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC) 557:07:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC) 533:22:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC) 518:14:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC) 499:04:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC) 478:10:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC) 439:08:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC) 410:04:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC) 383:00:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC) 349:23:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC) 329:23:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC) 309:23:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC) 289:23:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC) 269:23:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC) 249:23:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 452:Biblical Archaeology Society 427:Biblical Archaeology Society 653:23:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC) 623:Biblical Archaeology Review 506:Biblical Archaeology Review 448:Biblical Archaeology Review 422:Biblical Archaeology Review 393:Biblical Archaeology Review 88:(AfD)? Read these primers! 68:19:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC) 54:Biblical Archaeology Review 689: 564:per Jclemens and Dimadick. 396:, its sister publication. 662:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 369:Knowledge:Walled garden 86:Articles for deletion 450:, failing that to 613: 381: 351: 331: 311: 291: 271: 103:Guide to deletion 93:How to contribute 680: 597: 590: 588: 586: 476: 375: 230: 229: 215: 163: 145: 83: 34: 688: 687: 683: 682: 681: 679: 678: 677: 676: 670:deletion review 614: 609: 593: 581: 579: 455: 172: 136: 120: 117: 80: 77: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 686: 684: 675: 674: 656: 655: 645:Jackattack1597 638: 599: 589: 578: 577: 576: 559: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 480: 441: 413: 412: 385: 361:Hershel Shanks 353: 352: 332: 312: 292: 272: 233: 232: 169: 116: 115: 110: 100: 95: 78: 76: 71: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 685: 673: 671: 667: 663: 658: 657: 654: 650: 646: 642: 639: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624: 619: 616: 615: 612: 607: 603: 598: 596: 587: 584: 575: 571: 567: 563: 560: 558: 554: 550: 546: 543: 540: 534: 530: 526: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 507: 502: 501: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 481: 479: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 453: 449: 445: 442: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423: 418: 415: 414: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 394: 389: 386: 384: 379: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 355: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 330: 326: 322: 318: 313: 310: 306: 302: 298: 293: 290: 286: 282: 278: 273: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 140: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 114: 111: 108: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 87: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 66: 65: 61: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 661: 659: 640: 621: 617: 594: 580: 561: 541: 482: 443: 420: 416: 397: 391: 387: 365:Bible Review 364: 356: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 122:Bible Review 79: 74:Bible Review 63: 58: 49: 47: 31: 28: 606:revolutions 545:WP:NJOURNAL 487:WP:NJOURNAL 373:Anachronist 237:WP:NJOURNAL 199:free images 628:XOR'easter 431:Randykitty 666:talk page 542:Weak Keep 37:talk page 668:or in a 583:Relisted 549:Dimadick 525:Jclemens 491:Jclemens 457:Headbomb 357:Redirect 166:View log 107:glossary 59:Spinning 39:or in a 602:spin me 566:4meter4 205:WP refs 193:scholar 139:protect 134:history 84:New to 402:Mangoe 235:Fails 177:Google 143:delete 618:Merge 595:78.26 444:Merge 417:Merge 388:merge 220:JSTOR 181:books 160:views 152:watch 148:links 64:Spark 50:merge 16:< 649:talk 641:Keep 632:talk 570:talk 562:Keep 553:talk 529:talk 514:talk 495:talk 483:Keep 435:talk 429:. -- 406:talk 378:talk 345:talk 325:talk 305:talk 285:talk 265:talk 245:talk 213:FENS 187:news 156:logs 130:talk 126:edit 620:to 510:jps 454:. 446:to 419:to 390:to 359:to 341:jps 321:jps 301:jps 281:jps 261:jps 241:jps 227:TWL 164:– ( 52:to 651:) 634:) 604:/ 572:) 555:) 531:) 516:) 497:) 471:· 467:· 463:· 437:) 408:) 398:BR 363:. 347:) 339:. 327:) 319:. 307:) 299:. 287:) 279:. 267:) 259:. 247:) 207:) 158:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 647:( 630:( 608:) 600:( 568:( 551:( 527:( 512:( 493:( 475:} 473:b 469:p 465:c 461:t 459:{ 433:( 404:( 380:) 376:( 343:( 323:( 303:( 283:( 263:( 243:( 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 162:) 124:( 109:) 105:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Biblical Archaeology Review
Spinning
Spark
19:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Bible Review

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Bible Review
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.