Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Bikash Lamichhane - Knowledge

Source 📝

339:. It says there are 44 categories. The cited nonRS gives the list which has four different categories for "Best Male Model". I don't know why models would have different categories per genre, except to increase the number of recipients. The RS also says the awards are presented based on "sms voting and jury judgement". It does not even bother to list all the categories and winners. So, the newsworthy bit with the event was that a minister was present and one artist got a lifetime achievement award and a few journalists were recognised; I think if winning here meant anything, the news would start with who won best singer, composer, song, album, etc. What help is an award list without a verifying RS alongside it? Regards! 336:
I've heard of them. They are sourced to an English site; I think you'll be able to tell the site is spam and not acceptable. It mentions the Young Mind Award but not the Everest Award. Searching for "Everest Music Award" on google gives exactly two results: this article and one mirror. My best guess is, Everest Award is a hoax ("Sagarmatha" is the Nepali word for Mt. Everest). For Young Minds Award, Google goes directly to the UK, even though I am searching from Nepal. That leaves "Sagarmath Music Award" which I have seen listed on other bios on Knowledge but it does not have an article and it can't be used to presume notability. I found an RS about the award
335:
Thank you 4meter4! I did not mention them because the sources are trash and the awards wouldn't otherwise be enough for notability. I have never heard of the last two awards. I don't follow the field closely but when I've seen awards listed on other musician bios, I've at least been able to say that
200: 274: 250:. It was posted two days later and credits the piece to "Annapurna", calling it news which it isn't. That raises question about both reliability and independence; one SIGCOV isn't enough anyway. 317:. While I agree with the nominator's analysis overall, my only hesitation to voting delete is the claimed award wins which the nominator did not address in the source analysis. @ 161: 194: 294: 108: 93: 134: 129: 138: 337: 341: 299: 279: 259: 121: 215: 88: 81: 17: 182: 102: 98: 359: 176: 442: 40: 425: 402: 379: 348: 330: 306: 286: 266: 63: 172: 242:, aside from being promotional which almost all Nepali entertainment coverage is, is that its clone is found 125: 344: 302: 282: 262: 222: 438: 398: 36: 238:, even mere mentions are not found in online portals of reputed reliable sources. The thing about that 117: 69: 235: 419: 208: 374: 58: 188: 326: 318: 231: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
437:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
394: 390: 239: 412: 369: 253: 53: 322: 247: 155: 321:
is there a reason why we should not count these awards towards notability?
243: 433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
362:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
275:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
151: 147: 143: 207: 368:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 445:). No further edits should be made to this page. 293:Note: This discussion has been included in the 273:Note: This discussion has been included in the 221: 8: 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 295:list of Nepal-related deletion discussions 292: 272: 7: 389:- No specific contribution to pass 24: 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 403:04:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 380:04:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC) 349:07:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC) 331:00:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC) 307:03:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 287:03:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 267:03:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 426:03:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC) 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 64:14:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC) 462: 435:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 410:doesn't seem notable. 82:Articles for deletion 234:at best. Aside from 382: 309: 289: 118:Bikash Lamichhane 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 70:Bikash Lamichhane 453: 422: 415: 377: 372: 367: 365: 363: 257: 226: 225: 211: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 461: 460: 456: 455: 454: 452: 451: 450: 449: 443:deletion review 424: 420: 413: 383: 375: 370: 358: 356: 251: 168: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 459: 457: 448: 447: 429: 428: 418: 405: 366: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 311: 310: 290: 229: 228: 165: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 458: 446: 444: 440: 436: 431: 430: 427: 423: 417: 416: 409: 406: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 385: 384: 381: 378: 373: 364: 361: 350: 347: 346: 343: 338: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 313: 312: 308: 305: 304: 301: 296: 291: 288: 285: 284: 281: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 265: 264: 261: 255: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 224: 220: 217: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 170:Find sources: 166: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 434: 432: 411: 407: 386: 357: 342:Usedtobecool 340: 319:Usedtobecool 314: 300:Usedtobecool 298: 280:Usedtobecool 278: 260:Usedtobecool 258: 230: 218: 212: 204: 197: 191: 185: 179: 169: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 246:in another 236:this SIGCOV 195:free images 254:NPP action 232:WP:TOOSOON 439:talk page 414:Clog Wolf 391:WP:NACTOR 240:WP:SIGCOV 37:talk page 441:or in a 360:Relisted 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 323:4meter4 315:Comment 201:WP refs 189:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 408:Delete 395:nirmal 387:Delete 376:plicit 173:Google 139:delete 60:plicit 50:delete 248:WP:RS 216:JSTOR 177:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 421:Howl 399:talk 327:talk 244:here 209:FENS 183:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 223:TWL 160:– ( 401:) 345:☎️ 329:) 303:☎️ 297:. 283:☎️ 277:. 263:☎️ 203:) 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 52:. 397:( 393:. 371:✗ 325:( 256:) 252:( 227:) 219:· 213:· 205:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 180:· 175:( 167:( 164:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
14:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Bikash Lamichhane

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Bikash Lamichhane
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.