254:
I've now updated the article, added the 2006 winners and a reference to the official press release. I'm sure the release has been picked up somewhere, and perhaps someone can come up with a copy of the convention program where it's presented. It's an important award, it's presented to important
301:
article. Enough waffling from me. High-profile presentation at a major awards ceremony, coverage by the Comics press, and every name involved in giving the awards being noteworthy justifies inclusion somewhere on
Knowledge (XXG).
272:
Your improvements are good, but if an award is notable, it is surely covered somewhere in the press. (It's an award, after all, it's supposed to be famous). I'll change my vote to Keep if regular press mentions are found.
203:
Unless a reliable source can be found before the close of this AfD. It's difficult to have an article without a source. How would we know that anything stated in the article was correct?
110:
237:. My only question is if this is a special prize at the Eisners, and perhaps belongs on the Eisner Awards page. The recipients of the Finger Award are included on the
121:
306:
263:
207:
195:
175:
134:
83:
78:
228:
carried the press release when this award was founded, (note that comicon.com is not associated with comic-con.org), has press coverage at
87:
70:
17:
168:
148:
I don't want to be accused of "canvassing," bit I'm sure if this were mentioned at
Project Comics they'd come up with something.
139:
The problem is that there are no reliable sources. It was not mentioned in any newspaper or anything, just in a few blogs.
321:
36:
118:
320:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
277:
245:
152:
143:
52:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
229:
298:
225:
217:
74:
216:(EC) Well, is the question notability or verifiability? The award exists. It's presented at the
140:
66:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
260:
149:
131:
274:
204:
165:
220:-- the largest industry convention in the country -- and is presented "along side" the
49:
238:
184:
294:
221:
130:
and add sources. Important new awards program in a major field of popular culture.
233:
117:
It fails to establish its notability, no reliable sources, no verifiability, etc.
104:
235:
188:
303:
242:
192:
164:-- I've posted about this debate at the Comics Wikiproject noticeboard.
255:
people in comic history, it's verified and notable and noteworthy.
314:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
232:
and the official Comic-Con website has pages on the winners
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:). No further edits should be made to this page.
224:-- the most prestigious awards for the medium.
8:
191:coverage is a little vauge in this regard.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
307:20:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
278:19:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
264:18:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
246:18:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
208:18:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
196:18:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
183:-- Is this award part of the
176:15:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
153:19:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
144:17:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
135:17:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
122:13:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
53:10:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
218:San Diago Comics Convention
341:
239:Eisner Award winners list
317:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
299:Comic-Con International
46:no consensus to delete
293:into an appropriate
119:Ayatollah's hashish
48:, default to keep.
67:Bill Finger Award
59:Bill Finger Award
332:
319:
173:
108:
90:
34:
340:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
330:
329:
328:
322:deletion review
315:
241:for that year.
169:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
338:
336:
327:
326:
310:
309:
283:
282:
281:
280:
267:
266:
251:
250:
249:
248:
211:
210:
198:
178:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
337:
325:
323:
318:
312:
311:
308:
305:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
279:
276:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
262:
258:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
236:
234:
231:
227:
223:
222:Eisner Awards
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
190:
186:
185:Eisner Awards
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
167:
163:
160:
154:
151:
147:
146:
145:
142:
138:
137:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
316:
313:
295:Eisner Award
290:
286:
256:
200:
180:
170:
161:
127:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
261:Newyorkbrad
257:Strong keep
150:Newyorkbrad
132:Newyorkbrad
275:EdJohnston
205:EdJohnston
189:Comic-Con
50:Sandstein
230:The Beat
226:The Beat
111:View log
187:? The
181:Comment
162:Comment
84:protect
79:history
201:Delete
141:bogdan
88:delete
291:Merge
171:juice
166:Mango
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
287:Keep
128:Keep
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
304:~CS
297:or
289:or
243:~CS
193:~CS
109:– (
259:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.