524:
its very first version. As I wrote above, what one needs to know is the right name and the actual science, rather than the "facts" that people foolishly think a television comedy programme has imparted. The actual science, redirected from the silly television comedy programme name, will inform the reader.
450:
article is a lot harder to make out (it doesn't ever say what Bingo wings are) but it seems to have something to do with being tricep skin folds. As far as I can tell it's basically a slang term. So redirecting it to encyclopedic content seems an excellent idea. If anyone has a better idea or care to
523:
This article isn't about the phrase, and never was. (Ironically, the very WP:DICT policy that you referenced in your nomination makes it clear that articles about the people/concepts/events/places/things that their titles denote.) It's about the biological phenomenon, and has been from pretty much
516:
is far from being) on the anthropometry of the upper arm would cover things such as the age-related changes in these measurements. (There are published tables of the means and standard deviations, for some populations, for these measures.) In particular, it would cover the age-related changes and
471:
I appreciate the huge amount of addition you've done to the article since I nominated it, but clearly your additions have nothing to do with the term "bingo wings". The article doesn't even mention the term anymore. It seems there is a disconnect between you and the voter below this comment; do the
521:(which have been studied for several populations) in measured fat, bone, and muscle that are the reality of the phenomenon that has been informally described in this article (and elsewhere) as "tuckshop arms", "batwings", "bingo wings", and other such names.
527:
Readers coming to
Knowledge (XXG) from a television comedy programme thinking that "old people get bingo wings" and learning the more complex biological reality. Imagine that! It would be almost like an encyclopaedia. ☺
637:
What would the accurate name be for this? If the article is intended to be a scientific anatomy article (which I think would be great) the name certainly needs to change and "bingo wings" can redirect to the new name.
195:
553:
96:
472:
keepers want the article to be academic (which I think is valid, but should be renamed in this case) or about the use of the phrase "bingo wings" (in which case I still feel deletion is in order)?
615:
I already did. It was in boldface in the first sentence of the article at the point that I added the horizontal rule hint above. I also created a redirect ready to be renamed over. And one can
599:
I m not sure that any of these justify the use of the term as the title for the article, at least with the present material, and I urger Uncle BG to suggest something more appropriate.
619:
put that name into a search engine and come up with some of the sources that I've used and still have yet to use. Once one knows the right name, one finds that there's actually
156:
189:
91:
313:
Wrong. Try again. That's not the right name for the subject that involves fat on the upper arm and (amongst other things) what happens to it as one ages.
392:
I suggest more reading. You could start with reading the article, which, since you wrote below the horizontal rule here, you clearly haven't done yet.
428:
An opinion based upon not even reading the article at hand isn't a useful opinion. As is an opinion based upon not reading what a pannus actually is.
277:
This facet of human antomy (This article was marked as an anatomy stub.) is a perfectly valid subject. One simply needs to know the right name and the
327:
There's really no need for things like "Wrong. Try again." I'm just trying to make WP better. I presume you're doing the same, so why try to
565:
17:
680:
I withdraw my nomination for deletion, since this article now has a completely different name and completely different content.
123:
118:
689:
665:
647:
632:
610:
594:
537:
507:
481:
460:
437:
423:
401:
387:
358:
344:
322:
308:
290:
269:
247:
75:
486:
Maybe it could be redirected to a more medically appropriate title, and have a section in that article called "Bingo Wings"?
127:
49:
571:
210:
177:
110:
704:
562:
36:
556:
70:
227:
559:
685:
643:
568:
477:
456:
419:
383:
340:
304:
243:
703:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
171:
588:
501:
53:
234:, and if we're going to start doing so, this phrase would not be among the trailblazers. This is a slang
167:
681:
639:
473:
452:
415:
379:
336:
300:
239:
231:
217:
203:
661:
580:
493:
265:
628:
533:
433:
397:
354:
318:
286:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
349:"Wrong." is the response to "Right". And it's only you who is thinking that this is a game.
114:
238:, not in widespread use, seems to mainly be known to fans of a particular television show.
235:
183:
657:
606:
407:
261:
257:
624:
623:
dealing with what people who know only television comedy know as "bingo wings". ☺
529:
429:
393:
350:
314:
282:
281:(as opposed to what is (misre)presented as fact by a television comedy programme).
144:
447:
106:
81:
652:
I think that the correct name for this aspect of the human anatomy would be
442:"Pannus is a medical term for a hanging flap of tissue." -Knowledge (XXG)'s
601:
512:
TheWeakWilled has hit the nail on the head. A full article (which this
226:
Survived first deletion debate because it was in a dictionary. However
653:
443:
411:
375:
332:
296:
697:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
328:
406:
I have a very short attention span. It can also be merged to
230:. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't have articles on every entry in
151:
140:
136:
132:
202:
216:
97:Articles for deletion/Bingo wings (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
707:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
295:Right, and there's already an article for
451:fix the article I'm happy to reconsider.
89:
256:as per nom. Or, in case, redirect to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
88:
24:
414:works okay. Otherwise delete. :)
92:Articles for deletion/Bingo wings
50:Anthropometry of the upper arm
1:
690:02:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
666:10:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
648:06:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
633:01:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
611:21:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
595:19:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
538:01:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
508:19:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
482:19:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
461:04:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
438:01:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
424:22:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
402:18:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
388:18:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
359:01:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
345:19:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
323:18:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
309:18:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
291:15:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
270:09:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
248:05:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
76:22:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
724:
700:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
621:quite a lot of science
331:me like we're playing
87:AfDs for this article:
372:Delete & redirect
232:Chambers Dictionary
44:The result was
228:WP:NOTADICTIONARY
715:
702:
593:
584:
577:
552:Widespread use:
519:seasonal changes
506:
497:
490:
221:
220:
206:
154:
148:
130:
67:
34:
723:
722:
718:
717:
716:
714:
713:
712:
711:
705:deletion review
698:
682:Conical Johnson
640:Conical Johnson
591:
585:
578:
574:
504:
498:
491:
487:
474:Conical Johnson
453:ChildofMidnight
416:ChildofMidnight
380:ChildofMidnight
337:Conical Johnson
301:Conical Johnson
240:Conical Johnson
163:
150:
121:
105:
102:
85:
73:
72:Call me MoP! :D
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
721:
719:
710:
709:
693:
692:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
587:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
500:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
410:. But I think
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
335:or something?
279:actual science
274:
273:
272:
224:
223:
160:
101:
100:
99:
94:
86:
84:
79:
71:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
720:
708:
706:
701:
695:
694:
691:
687:
683:
679:
678:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
645:
641:
636:
635:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
603:
598:
597:
596:
592:
590:
583:
582:
576:
572:
569:
566:
563:
560:
557:
554:
551:
548:
540:
539:
535:
531:
525:
520:
515:
511:
510:
509:
505:
503:
496:
495:
489:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
470:
462:
458:
454:
449:
446:article. The
445:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:anthropometry
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
158:
153:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
98:
95:
93:
90:
83:
80:
78:
77:
74:
68:
65:
61:
57:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
699:
696:
620:
616:
600:
586:
579:
575:
549:
526:
522:
518:
513:
499:
492:
488:
371:
278:
258:Bo' Selecta!
253:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
63:
59:
55:
45:
43:
31:
28:
448:Bingo wings
190:free images
107:Bingo wings
82:Bingo wings
236:neologism
658:McMarcoP
262:McMarcoP
157:View log
46:redirect
625:Uncle G
530:Uncle G
430:Uncle G
394:Uncle G
351:Uncle G
315:Uncle G
283:Uncle G
196:WP refs
184:scholar
124:protect
119:history
654:pannus
589:Willed
502:Willed
444:pannus
412:pannus
376:pannus
333:Halo 3
297:pannus
254:Delete
168:Google
152:delete
128:delete
66:uppets
58:aster
607:talk
517:even
211:JSTOR
172:books
155:) – (
145:views
137:watch
133:links
16:<
686:talk
662:talk
644:talk
629:talk
617:even
581:Weak
550:Keep
534:talk
514:stub
494:Weak
478:talk
457:talk
434:talk
420:talk
398:talk
384:talk
355:talk
341:talk
319:talk
305:talk
287:talk
266:talk
244:talk
204:FENS
178:news
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
602:DGG
573:.
374:to
329:pwn
218:TWL
48:to
688:)
664:)
656:.
646:)
631:)
609:)
570:,
567:,
564:,
561:,
558:,
555:,
536:)
480:)
459:)
436:)
422:)
400:)
386:)
378:.
357:)
343:)
321:)
307:)
299:.
289:)
268:)
260:.
246:)
198:)
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
69:-
62:f
52:.
684:(
660:(
642:(
627:(
605:(
532:(
476:(
455:(
432:(
418:(
396:(
382:(
353:(
339:(
317:(
303:(
285:(
264:(
242:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
149:(
147:)
109:(
64:P
60:o
56:M
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.