Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Biological Resource Center - Knowledge

Source 📝

350:, see below. - as written the article is only sourced to the OECD definition, which is really vague. You have to sort through all the University of X Biological Resource Centers, and the handful of bio departments that seem to have given this name to their study help/tutoring service/office hours, but there are some sources that discuss the concept under this name, often about genomics or microbiology collections - for example 213: 302:
This comes across as jargon for something I might recognize if it were called by its common name. If it were expanded to the point of explaining what it really is, I might favor keeping it.
207: 170: 384:"The Biological Resource Centre" that got into trouble for misusing human remains is not the subject of this article. The other references you link are effectively covering 366:
a couple of years ago for misusing human remains, and which may itself be notable. (Even better, the owner of the human-remains company was apparently called Stephen Gore.)
281: 261: 143: 138: 147: 130: 117: 102: 409:
are for sure included, and the first article I linked uses a broad enough definition to include a 16th-century herbarium. I notice we also have
228: 363: 195: 515:. They have essentially the same scope, cover the same facilities, and biorepository has more and better citations/structure. — 134: 97: 90: 17: 189: 524: 501: 474: 432: 397: 375: 333: 311: 293: 273: 253: 72: 185: 174: 111: 107: 483: 445: 428: 371: 126: 78: 235: 541: 60: 40: 402:
Heh, okay: "...which may itself, also, separately, be notable, as the topic of another, different article" :)
465: 362:. Search results also overlap with a company called the Biological Resource Center which apparently got in 393: 357: 329: 289: 269: 249: 354: 537: 424: 367: 201: 36: 324:
and genomic databases. The jargon is too obscure for this to be the page title if the article is kept.
221: 516: 497: 459: 406: 68: 414: 417: 389: 325: 285: 265: 245: 86: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
536:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
307: 59:
Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to
351: 471: 455: 360: 512: 493: 410: 64: 53: 388:, which we already have an article for. A redirect to gene bank seems appropriate. 63:- unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year! 164: 303: 385: 321: 413:, though, which does seem to be essentially the same subject (see 244:
Can't find any coverage indicating that this is a notable topic
532:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
486:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
448:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
320:
This term seems to cover what are more commonly known as
160: 156: 152: 220: 492:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 454:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 544:). No further edits should be made to this page. 280:Note: This discussion has been included in the 260:Note: This discussion has been included in the 234: 8: 282:list of Biology-related deletion discussions 262:list of Science-related deletion discussions 118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 279: 259: 405:This is broader than just gene banks - 7: 24: 103:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 525:13:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC) 502:16:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC) 475:00:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC) 73:00:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 433:08:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 398:03:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 376:03:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 334:00:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 312:00:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 294:23:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 274:23:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 254:23:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC) 93:(AfD)? Read these primers! 561: 127:Biological Resource Center 79:Biological Resource Center 61:Knowledge:Deletion review 534:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 175:edits since nomination 91:Articles for deletion 407:culture collections 504: 477: 296: 276: 108:Guide to deletion 98:How to contribute 552: 522: 519: 491: 489: 487: 470: 468: 462: 453: 451: 449: 425:Opabinia regalis 368:Opabinia regalis 239: 238: 224: 168: 150: 88: 56:. Merge away... 34: 560: 559: 555: 554: 553: 551: 550: 549: 548: 542:deletion review 520: 517: 482: 480: 466: 460: 458: 444: 442: 181: 141: 125: 122: 85: 82: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 558: 556: 547: 546: 528: 527: 490: 452: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 419:), so I'd say 403: 379: 378: 339: 338: 337: 336: 315: 314: 297: 277: 242: 241: 178: 121: 120: 115: 105: 100: 83: 81: 76: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 557: 545: 543: 539: 535: 530: 529: 526: 523: 514: 513:biorepository 510: 507: 506: 505: 503: 499: 495: 488: 485: 478: 476: 473: 469: 463: 461:Locomotive207 457: 450: 447: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 415: 412: 411:biorepository 408: 404: 401: 400: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 381: 380: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 358: 355: 352: 349: 346: 345: 341: 340: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 318: 317: 316: 313: 309: 305: 301: 298: 295: 291: 287: 283: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 187: 184: 183:Find sources: 179: 176: 172: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 123: 119: 116: 113: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 95: 94: 92: 87: 80: 77: 75: 74: 70: 66: 62: 57: 55: 54:Biorepository 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 533: 531: 508: 481: 479: 443: 441: 420: 390:Hemiauchenia 364:some trouble 347: 343: 342: 326:Hemiauchenia 299: 286:Hemiauchenia 266:Hemiauchenia 246:Hemiauchenia 243: 231: 225: 217: 210: 204: 198: 192: 182: 84: 58: 49: 47: 31: 28: 208:free images 518:Shibboleth 386:gene banks 322:gene banks 538:talk page 37:talk page 540:or in a 494:Missvain 484:Relisted 446:Relisted 171:View log 112:glossary 65:Missvain 39:or in a 423:there. 300:comment 214:WP refs 202:scholar 144:protect 139:history 89:New to 304:Mangoe 186:Google 148:delete 511:into 509:Merge 421:merge 348:Merge 229:JSTOR 190:books 165:views 157:watch 153:links 50:merge 16:< 498:talk 467:talk 429:talk 394:talk 372:talk 344:Keep 330:talk 308:talk 290:talk 270:talk 250:talk 222:FENS 196:news 161:logs 135:talk 131:edit 69:talk 521:ink 236:TWL 169:– ( 52:to 500:) 472:🌀 456:🌀 431:) 416:, 396:) 374:) 359:, 356:, 353:, 332:) 310:) 292:) 284:. 272:) 264:. 252:) 216:) 173:| 163:| 159:| 155:| 151:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 71:) 496:( 464:- 427:( 392:( 370:( 328:( 306:( 288:( 268:( 248:( 240:) 232:· 226:· 218:· 211:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 188:( 180:( 177:) 167:) 129:( 114:) 110:( 67:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Biorepository
Knowledge:Deletion review
Missvain
talk
00:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Biological Resource Center

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Biological Resource Center
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.