547:
Your second link is some sports story, the fourth link isn't a review but rather a clickbait blog post based on the trailer, and the other two are already cited in the article (I know, because I put those citations there). That said, I actually think the film is notable based on the sources already
548:
cited, but since the plot of the TV movie is the same as the story of the crime, then there's no added value in a separate article on the TV movie. It's good for a well-sourced paragraph in the article on Susan Wright, though. In other words, precisely the situation that
441:
suggests that it's more beneficial to readers to take the content and sources from a likely permastub and place them in broader context in a larger article. In this case that's the article about the convicted murderer. Was AfD necessary for this operation? No, but
533:. Note that the title is the press nickname of the killer. Suspect there may be more - hard to locate with all the movie crud and overabundance of hits (from DVD sales, movie review replication sites, etc.) - it seems it was rather poorly received.
566:
Fixed the second link - must have mis-clicked or scrolled down. A merge is a possible outcome here, I'm still weakly leaning towards keep here - I suspect there are more sources on the TV movie, and based on what I see this just barely scrapes
208:
275:
313:
161:
202:
522:
526:
530:
294:
256:
93:
108:
388:
film critics; I’m sure a tabloid doesn’t fit the bill. Just because a film exists doesn’t make it notable. If anything, the one sentence about it in
168:
134:
129:
138:
121:
88:
81:
17:
410:
for years, and whose firing from NYDN after 35 years of television/film reviews was covered in national media? That David
Hinckley?
223:
518:
513:
190:
56:
is notable; the question is whether the film about the crime is independently notable. About that, there's no consensus. --
102:
98:
481:
597:
40:
406:
Just to clarify: you're referring to culture critic David
Hinckley, whose NYDN reviews have been republished in the
184:
576:
561:
542:
502:
472:
455:
419:
401:
375:
348:
324:
305:
286:
267:
248:
63:
180:
434:
53:
125:
230:
593:
443:
371:
344:
36:
239:
Put simply: the true crime was notable... this movie is not. No wonder you can’t find sources for it.
468:
397:
244:
339:
as most nationally broadcast series and films do, so it should be included in the encyclopedia IMV
216:
549:
438:
557:
451:
415:
335:
as sources have been found and added to the article so there is evidence that the article passes
60:
196:
572:
538:
317:
298:
279:
260:
117:
77:
69:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
592:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
367:
340:
356:
336:
464:
393:
240:
493:
553:
447:
411:
363:
57:
568:
534:
389:
155:
463:. The notable cast is enough for it to slide over the notability bar. --
588:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
437:. The cited sources support the notability of the subject, but
484:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
276:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
151:
147:
143:
215:
490:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
229:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
600:). No further edits should be made to this page.
312:Note: This discussion has been included in the
293:Note: This discussion has been included in the
274:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:Note: This discussion has been included in the
52:. There's no debate that the crime committed by
314:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
311:
295:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
292:
273:
254:
257:list of Film-related deletion discussions
384:let’s see, NFILM requires reviews from
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
392:’s article about it is enough.
1:
444:when all you have is a hammer
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
617:
577:07:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
562:21:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
543:11:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
503:18:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
473:12:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
456:00:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
420:00:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
362:per film reviews added by
64:15:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
402:12:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
376:10:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
349:23:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
325:17:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
306:17:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
287:17:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
268:17:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
249:16:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
590:Please do not modify it.
552:is intended to address.
512:- based on reviews in -
32:Please do not modify it.
435:Susan Wright (murderer)
54:Susan Wright (murderer)
82:Articles for deletion
531:Culturemap Houson
505:
501:
408:Los Angeles Times
327:
308:
289:
270:
118:Blue Eyed Butcher
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
70:Blue Eyed Butcher
608:
500:
498:
491:
489:
487:
485:
386:nationally known
322:
303:
284:
265:
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
79:
34:
616:
615:
611:
610:
609:
607:
606:
605:
604:
598:deletion review
506:
494:
492:
480:
478:
318:
299:
280:
261:
176:
167:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
614:
612:
603:
602:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
488:
477:
476:
475:
458:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
352:
351:
329:
328:
309:
290:
271:
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
613:
601:
599:
595:
591:
586:
585:
578:
574:
570:
565:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
546:
545:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:NY Daily News
524:
521:
520:
515:
511:
508:
507:
504:
499:
497:
486:
483:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:User:Bakazaka
361:
358:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
323:
321:
315:
310:
307:
304:
302:
296:
291:
288:
285:
283:
277:
272:
269:
266:
264:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
589:
587:
523:houstonpress
519:houstonpress
517:
509:
495:
479:
460:
430:
407:
390:Susan Wright
385:
359:
354:
353:
332:
320:CAPTAIN RAJU
319:
301:CAPTAIN RAJU
300:
282:CAPTAIN RAJU
281:
263:CAPTAIN RAJU
262:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
368:E.M.Gregory
341:Atlantic306
203:free images
496:Sandstein
465:Necrothesp
394:Trillfendi
241:Trillfendi
594:talk page
550:WP:NOPAGE
510:Weak Keep
439:WP:NOPAGE
37:talk page
596:or in a
554:Bakazaka
482:Relisted
448:Bakazaka
412:Bakazaka
162:View log
103:glossary
58:RoySmith
39:or in a
569:Icewhiz
535:Icewhiz
446:, etc.
209:WP refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
529:, and
357:WP:HEY
337:WP:GNG
181:Google
139:delete
61:(talk)
567:over.
514:chron
431:Merge
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
573:talk
558:talk
539:talk
469:talk
461:Keep
452:talk
416:talk
398:talk
372:talk
360:Keep
345:talk
333:Keep
245:talk
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
433:to
231:TWL
160:– (
575:)
560:)
541:)
525:,
516:,
471:)
454:)
418:)
400:)
374:)
347:)
316:.
297:.
278:.
259:.
247:)
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
571:(
556:(
537:(
467:(
450:(
414:(
396:(
370:(
366:.
355:*
343:(
243:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.