249:(a) Sources are easily found. I've added a number to the article straight from gbooks. People have written entire books on this one stereotype alone. How could it not possibly "warrant an encyclopedia article"? There are many, many more sources available. (b) Who cares if "the article is even precise"? If that were a reason for deletion we'd be down to a few thousand articles in no time. Fix it if it's not "precise." (c) Who cares how long it's been unsourced for? Notability is established by the existence of sources rather than their presence in the article. A few moments of checking would have saved everyone the time this AfD is going to suck up. AfD is not cleanup. Next time, do a little work before you push that twinkle button.—
180:
133:
174:
211:
while i'm sure this is actually a slang term, i'm not so sure that it warrants an encyclopedia article, or that the article is even precise.
140:
71:
267:
17:
299:
254:
106:
101:
110:
195:
162:
93:
57:
324:
295:
250:
40:
67:
156:
320:
36:
152:
303:
278:
258:
240:
223:
75:
291:
274:
236:
219:
287:
188:
61:
202:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
319:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
283:
270:
232:
215:
97:
168:
53:
127:
89:
81:
313:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
123:
119:
115:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
327:). No further edits should be made to this page.
268:Knowledge:Articles for deletion#Wikietiquette
201:
8:
214:also, completely unsourced for seven years.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
304:13:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
279:06:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
259:05:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
241:06:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
224:03:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
76:14:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
344:
316:Please do not modify it.
231:due to sourcing added.
32:Please do not modify it.
229:Withdrawn by nominator
296:alf laylah wa laylah
251:alf laylah wa laylah
58:WP:Non-admin closure
50:nomination withdrawn
286:, not to mention
335:
318:
206:
205:
191:
143:
131:
113:
64:
48:The result was
34:
343:
342:
338:
337:
336:
334:
333:
332:
331:
325:deletion review
314:
148:
139:
104:
88:
85:
62:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
341:
339:
330:
329:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
262:
261:
209:
208:
145:
84:
79:
63:Dharmadhyaksha
54:Speedy Keep #1
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
340:
328:
326:
322:
317:
311:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:WP:NOTCLEANUP
289:
285:
282:
281:
280:
276:
272:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
221:
217:
212:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
142:
138:
135:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
83:
80:
78:
77:
73:
69:
65:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
315:
312:
288:WP:VAGUEWAVE
246:
228:
227:
213:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
136:
49:
47:
31:
28:
175:free images
271:El Chivo 2
233:El Chivo 2
216:El Chivo 2
90:Black Buck
82:Black Buck
321:talk page
284:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
323:or in a
134:View log
39:or in a
181:WP refs
169:scholar
107:protect
102:history
153:Google
111:delete
196:JSTOR
157:books
141:Stats
128:views
120:watch
116:links
60:). §§
16:<
300:talk
290:and
275:talk
255:talk
247:Keep
237:talk
220:talk
189:FENS
163:news
124:logs
98:talk
94:edit
66:§§ {
294:.—
203:TWL
132:– (
302:)
277:)
257:)
239:)
222:)
183:)
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
74:}
52:.
298:(
273:(
253:(
235:(
218:(
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
137:·
130:)
92:(
72:C
70:/
68:T
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.