205:
consultant firm, and the article claims he developed two of their indexes. Unfortunately, the evidence of this consists entirely of promotional press releases where he writes for a conference program or an interview what he says he has done. The references are entirely press releases or his own articles.
208:
Possibly, just possibly, he is notable. I don't want to actually deny it on the basis of what I consider utterly incompetent work by a COI editor apparently ignorant or indifferent to what we consider reliable sources. The evidence would need to be gathered by a NPOV editor capable of presenting it
204:
The inclusion in the lede and infobox of claimed notability in a large number of occupations including the rather ill-defined ones of professional speaker, analyst and consultant is in my experience an almost sure sign of promotionalism. He has experience working as vice-president in a notable
275:
and IT customer research world, but no single source indicates notability. As a
Software Architect I have followed Forrester and Gartner's advice for over 2 decades, and I can tell you it's the advice not the speaker that important. It is one giant puff piece. It fails
166:
201:, and I think the combination of borderline notability and promotionalism makes a case for deletion. So do many of the specifics: Many things are asserted, but I think none of them amount to notability.
347:; low notability and promotional content. Even if somebody conjured up high-quality sources tomorrow which showed a higher level of notability, the article would still have to be rewritten from zero...
228:
271:
There is nothing in the article including references which indicate he is notable. The article is advert. The article communicates that he is a very busy individual who is well known in the
248:
197:
Nothing here appears to be notable, & everything appears to be promotional. Like some other articles I've proposed for deletion in the last day, the article was written by a
119:
160:
126:
310:
92:
87:
96:
17:
181:
79:
148:
198:
306:
375:
40:
335:
142:
301:
to promote the subject and as noted above by scope and none of the sources indicate notability and it fails
331:
138:
371:
356:
339:
314:
288:
260:
240:
220:
61:
57:
36:
83:
188:
352:
272:
174:
75:
67:
256:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
327:
298:
285:
281:
53:
323:
154:
209:
properly, and the article written from scratch. The current article will be of no help.
348:
302:
277:
216:
252:
232:
113:
211:
364:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
229:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
297:
As per DGG and Scope_creep .The article is a clearly paid
109:
105:
101:
173:
249:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
378:). No further edits should be made to this page.
187:
8:
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
227:Note: This debate has been included in the
246:
226:
7:
24:
199:known paid sock-puppetting editor
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
291:23:30 28 October 2013 (UTC)
357:22:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
340:20:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
322:promotional article failing
315:20:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
261:15:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
241:15:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
221:04:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
62:01:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
395:
367:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
307:Pharaoh of the Wizards
273:Customer experience
48:The result was
263:
243:
386:
369:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
383:
382:
376:deletion review
365:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
392:
390:
381:
380:
360:
359:
342:
332:Logical Cowboy
317:
292:
265:
264:
244:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
391:
379:
377:
373:
368:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
287:
283:
279:
274:
270:
269:Strong Delete
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
213:
206:
202:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
366:
363:
344:
319:
294:
268:
210:
207:
203:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
76:Bruce Temkin
68:Bruce Temkin
49:
47:
31:
28:
286:scope_creep
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
372:talk page
349:bobrayner
328:WP:AUTHOR
282:WP:ADVERT
253:• Gene93k
233:• Gene93k
37:talk page
374:or in a
324:WP:BASIC
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
345:Delete
320:Delete
303:WP:GNG
299:Advert
295:Delete
278:WP:BIO
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
217:talk
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
353:talk
336:talk
326:and
311:talk
289:talk
280:and
257:talk
237:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
330:.
212:DGG
189:TWL
118:– (
355:)
338:)
313:)
284:.
259:)
251:.
239:)
231:.
219:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
351:(
334:(
309:(
305:.
255:(
235:(
215:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.