420:, others (particularly my spelling/grammar entourage) are welcome to correct/improve. Okay the underlying entity has relocated but that's part of the history. It will no doubt be renamed in time but we can wait until the new name turns up. The redirect from the old link should help people trying to answer the question:
226:
357:
or possibly update and rename; it is now proposed to be built at
Parkeston, although if the level crossing is the reason for this it may be built somewhere else as it is also on the route to the new location.
274:
456:
I note your deep joy and have tweaked article though as per TOWIE the roads and names are unclear but shiny smooth wheels are expected. They might call the TMD Dorian for all I know.
179:
294:
220:
111:
126:
69:
395:
How do we judge notability? By multiple reliable secondary sources. What do I see here already? This might not be complete yet, but it's way past
186:
106:
99:
17:
152:
147:
438:
Speaking as a reader, I enjoyed the infobox that told me about
Brantham, per its title, and that its location was Brantham. ☺
156:
399:. When it is in operation (and whichever site matters much less), it will be a significant aspect of regional rail transport.
120:
116:
241:
376:
Deletion and renaming are two mutually exclusive outcomes for an administrator to enact. Which one do you actually want?
139:
76:
208:
492:
40:
62:
202:
429:
359:
257:
Has very little notability. Is a train depot that hasn't been finished yet, with no apparent significance.
404:
198:
488:
475:
447:
433:
408:
385:
371:
367:
349:
303:
299:
286:
266:
81:
36:
56:, suggested an alternative to deletion. A rename discussion, of course, is for the article talk page.
396:
278:
258:
248:
52:. Noting tat the only clear !vote for delete came from the nominator; the only other such also, per
471:
343:
324:
282:
262:
234:
425:
443:
400:
381:
143:
95:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
487:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
417:
363:
311:
Its well sourced but there is something about it that says to me that it wont be completed.
53:
214:
467:
338:
319:
439:
377:
135:
87:
173:
483:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
169:
165:
161:
233:
416:: I've done an update with the reference provided by
466:- well sourced by reliable sources. Passes WP:GNG.
275:
247:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
495:). No further edits should be made to this page.
293:Note: This discussion has been included in the
273:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
332:Sourcing has improved so happy to change to
295:list of England-related deletion discussions
127:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
317:until something substantial comes through.
292:
272:
362:, East Anglian Daily Times, 6 July 2019)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
112:Introduction to deletion process
422:what happened to Brantham TMD?
1:
102:(AfD)? Read these primers!
512:
476:10:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
448:00:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
386:00:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
350:07:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
82:10:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
434:16:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
409:16:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
372:15:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
330:10:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
304:10:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
287:10:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
267:10:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
485:Please do not modify it.
360:Harwich to get new depot
32:Please do not modify it.
100:Articles for deletion
59:(non-admin closure)
306:
289:
117:Guide to deletion
107:How to contribute
61:
503:
348:
329:
302:
252:
251:
237:
189:
177:
159:
97:
79:
74:
67:
57:
34:
511:
510:
506:
505:
504:
502:
501:
500:
499:
493:deletion review
337:
318:
298:
194:
185:
150:
134:
131:
94:
91:
77:
70:
63:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
509:
507:
498:
497:
479:
478:
460:
459:
458:
457:
451:
450:
436:
411:
390:
389:
388:
352:
308:
307:
290:
255:
254:
191:
130:
129:
124:
114:
109:
92:
90:
85:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
508:
496:
494:
490:
486:
481:
480:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
461:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
435:
431:
427:
426:Djm-leighpark
423:
419:
415:
412:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
356:
353:
351:
347:
346:
342:
341:
335:
331:
328:
327:
323:
322:
316:
310:
309:
305:
301:
300:North America
296:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
250:
246:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
197:
196:Find sources:
192:
188:
184:
181:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
154:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
104:
103:
101:
96:
89:
86:
84:
83:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
484:
482:
463:
421:
413:
401:Andy Dingley
392:
354:
344:
339:
333:
325:
320:
314:
313:I would say
312:
256:
244:
238:
230:
223:
217:
211:
205:
195:
182:
136:Brantham TMD
93:
88:Brantham TMD
72:SerialNumber
71:
64:
49:
47:
31:
28:
418:Peter James
364:Peter James
315:soft delete
221:free images
397:WP:CRYSTAL
489:talk page
468:Bookscale
279:Willbb234
259:Willbb234
37:talk page
491:or in a
180:View log
121:glossary
39:or in a
440:Uncle G
378:Uncle G
227:WP refs
215:scholar
153:protect
148:history
98:New to
355:Delete
199:Google
157:delete
54:policy
340:Night
321:Night
242:JSTOR
203:books
187:Stats
174:views
166:watch
162:links
78:54129
16:<
472:talk
464:Keep
444:talk
430:talk
414:Keep
405:talk
393:Keep
382:talk
368:talk
345:fury
334:keep
326:fury
283:talk
263:talk
235:FENS
209:news
170:logs
144:talk
140:edit
50:keep
249:TWL
178:– (
474:)
446:)
432:)
424:.
407:)
384:)
370:)
336:.
297:.
285:)
277:.
265:)
229:)
172:|
168:|
164:|
160:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
65:——
470:(
442:(
428:(
403:(
380:(
366:(
358:(
281:(
261:(
253:)
245:·
239:·
231:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
201:(
193:(
190:)
183:·
176:)
138:(
123:)
119:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.