Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Braves–Mets rivalry - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

532:
It smacks of tunnel vision and is a complete joke of a write up. I ask the editors here to show me how this article meets notability criteria over the Reds-Cardinals and list all the reliable sourcing that talks of the rivalry OUTSIDE of the late 90's matchups. I hate deleting articles, but fair is fair and despite my own numerous attempts find reliable sourcing to reference the rivalry and expand this article, there simply have not been enough...and definitely not as historic as the Reds-Cardinals.
531:
This article does not meet notability guidelines. We decided to delete the Reds-Cardinals rivalry page for that very reason. There were not enough notable sources depicting that rivalry just like there aren't enough now. This rivalry was strong in the late 90's and really no other time besides then.
364:
these kinds of articles, but that's not a valid delete reason, so I'm not using it. The aritcle appears to be well-sourced, if poorly written and organized, but again those aren't valid dleete reasons. I do think this type of content would be better covered on the main articles, seaso articloes, and
438:
What notability guidelines are you talking about? Has this rivalry stood the test of time? No. Have there been numerous sources documenting the rivalry since the inception of the Mets? No. Aside from the late 90's, there isn't any reason to even consider the two teams a rivalry. The Reds-Cardinals
337:"The only documentation of the rivalry is within the late 90s." Even if that is true (and there are certainly sources available at least for 1969 as well, and almost certainly for the early naughts), it is still well and more than adequately sourced. 149: 566:
Any Red-Cardinals rivalry is older than Mets=Braves, but unfortunately, despite several editors' (including myself) best efforts, virtually no sources could be found to support it. This one has plenty of available sources.
186: 207:
I think this page should be deleted. Most of the page is a reference to the Yankees and IMO there aren't enough reliable sources to support the questionable notability of this page to exist.
143: 110: 224: 182: 383:
Again, how is this well sourced? Sure there are multiple sources for a brief 5 year period, but a 5 year period doesn't warrant a rivalry article on wikipedia.
453:
Reds-Cardinals didn't have nearly the level of sourcing as this. Orioles-Yankees, as I recall, was deleted very easily because there was one source total. –
83: 78: 87: 70: 164: 131: 17: 508:
There is adequate sourcing over that period to establish notability. This "5 year rivalty" objection has no basis in policy.
125: 576: 555: 541: 517: 503: 485: 462: 448: 429: 406: 392: 374: 346: 332: 314: 291: 277: 259: 239: 216: 201: 52: 74: 121: 591: 36: 171: 590:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
282:
So you agree it is well sourced for a 5 year period? What policy or guideline is this 5 year rule based on?
66: 58: 494:
Adequate sourcing for a 5 year period, but not beyond that. A 5 year rivalry does not establish notability.
255: 420:
This article needs a good deal of work, especially to de-Yankee it, but it meets notability guidelines. –
137: 439:
and the Orioles-Yankees are bigger rivals who have stood the test of time longer than the Mets-Braves.
310: 235: 157: 551: 537: 499: 458: 444: 425: 388: 328: 273: 251: 212: 572: 513: 481: 402: 342: 287: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370: 323:
How can you really say that? The only documentation of the rivalry is within the late 90's.
306: 231: 49: 192: 185:, where contributors decided to list it here as a new AfD. See previous discussion at 547: 533: 495: 454: 440: 421: 384: 324: 269: 208: 546:
Of course you vote !strong delete, you're the person who brought this nomination. –
568: 509: 477: 398: 338: 283: 104: 366: 305:. Unlike the other rivalries up for afd, this one seems fairly well documented. 187:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Braves-Mets rivalry (2nd nomination)
584:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100: 96: 92: 156: 365:
playoff articles, but that's a reason for merging. -
268:How is this well sourced beyond the 5 year period? 170: 181:The following deletion proposal was submitted to 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 594:). No further edits should be made to this page. 476:- Adequate sourcing to establish notability. 225:list of Baseball-related deletion discussions 8: 223:Note: This debate has been included in the 222: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 397:Per what guideline or policy? 1: 577:19:35, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 556:00:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 542:13:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 518:19:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 504:14:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 486:00:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 463:00:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 449:14:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 430:14:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 407:19:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 393:14:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 375:06:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 347:19:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 333:14:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 315:16:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 292:19:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 278:14:01, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 260:00:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 250:Very well sourced article. 240:09:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 217:20:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 202:08:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 53:23:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 611: 587:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 67:Braves–Mets rivalry 59:Braves–Mets rivalry 360:- Frankly I don't 44:The result was 242: 228: 204: 200: 602: 589: 229: 199: 197: 190: 180: 175: 174: 160: 108: 90: 34: 610: 609: 605: 604: 603: 601: 600: 599: 598: 592:deletion review 585: 193: 191: 183:deletion review 117: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 608: 606: 597: 596: 581: 580: 579: 561: 560: 559: 558: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 489: 488: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 433: 432: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 378: 377: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 318: 317: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 263: 262: 244: 243: 178: 177: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 607: 595: 593: 588: 582: 578: 574: 570: 565: 564: 563: 562: 557: 553: 549: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 530: 529:Strong Delete 527: 526: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506: 505: 501: 497: 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 483: 479: 475: 472: 471: 464: 460: 456: 452: 451: 450: 446: 442: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 427: 423: 419: 416: 415: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381: 380: 379: 376: 372: 368: 363: 359: 356: 355: 348: 344: 340: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 316: 312: 308: 304: 301: 300: 293: 289: 285: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 257: 253: 252:Kinston eagle 249: 246: 245: 241: 237: 233: 226: 221: 220: 219: 218: 214: 210: 205: 203: 198: 196: 188: 184: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 123: 120: 119:Find sources: 115: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 586: 583: 528: 473: 417: 361: 357: 302: 247: 206: 194: 179: 167: 161: 153: 146: 140: 134: 128: 118: 45: 43: 31: 28: 144:free images 307:Spanneraol 232:Tom Morris 195:Sandstein 50:Courcelles 548:Muboshgu 534:Arnabdas 496:Arnabdas 455:Muboshgu 441:Arnabdas 422:Muboshgu 385:Arnabdas 325:Arnabdas 270:Arnabdas 209:Arnabdas 111:View log 569:Rlendog 510:Rlendog 478:Rlendog 399:Rlendog 339:Rlendog 284:Rlendog 150:WP refs 138:scholar 84:protect 79:history 367:BilCat 122:Google 88:delete 165:JSTOR 126:books 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 573:talk 552:talk 538:talk 514:talk 500:talk 482:talk 474:Keep 459:talk 445:talk 426:talk 418:Keep 403:talk 389:talk 371:talk 362:like 358:Keep 343:talk 329:talk 311:talk 303:Keep 288:talk 274:talk 256:talk 248:Keep 236:talk 213:talk 158:FENS 132:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 46:keep 172:TWL 109:– ( 575:) 554:) 540:) 516:) 502:) 484:) 461:) 447:) 428:) 405:) 391:) 373:) 345:) 331:) 313:) 290:) 276:) 258:) 238:) 227:. 215:) 189:. 152:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 571:( 550:( 536:( 512:( 498:( 480:( 457:( 443:( 424:( 401:( 387:( 369:( 341:( 327:( 309:( 286:( 272:( 254:( 234:( 230:— 211:( 176:) 168:· 162:· 154:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 129:· 124:( 116:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Courcelles
23:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Braves–Mets rivalry
Braves–Mets rivalry
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
deletion review
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Braves-Mets rivalry (2nd nomination)
 Sandstein 
08:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Arnabdas

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.