535:- I'm going to be blunt and to the point - I'm ticked off at how so much time seems to have been wasted on getting this to GA status when lets be honest it's not an entirely notable song (Until today I've never heard of the song and again just assuming here but I assume not many other people have either,) It would've been better if perhaps a more well known song was picked for GA status.... That being said I also don't want peoples hardwork to be for complete nothing so based on the fact it's at GA status I have to say Keep. –
55:. After some thought. No one here is advocating outright deletion, so redirection really is the way to go here. Noting that it is somewhat unusual for a GA to be deleted/redirected, but as per those that have weighed in on this nomination in these circumstances it is reasonable to do so. As always, if there's anything substantial and worth merging to the parent album article, it can be done so from the page history, as long as it is attributed. (
566:"It is unfortunate that editors put effort into writing or maintaining articles that do not meet Knowledge (XXG) policy or guidelines. Many editors have seen articles that they invested time and energy into get deleted, and there is no doubt that this can be discouraging. However, the fact of the effort put into an article does not excuse the article from the requirements of policy and guidelines."
780:
issues; this remains a non-notable song, just as it was in the last AfD in 2009. As notability is not a GA criterion, I'm at a loss as to why being a GA has been cited here as any kind of reason: Good
Article quality can be created for all sorts of non-notable people, places, or things. I have seen a
257:
by the GNG. Additionally, NSONGS states, "Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent
679:
as yes it did pass GAN. It charted highly on the same chart in separate years, which is in fact quite a rarity. It has been performed about 250 times over three tours. I believe that it does in fact just about pass. Don't forget, it wasn't even released as a single, so the fact that this being
624:
Yep I agree that it must be discouraging to have their hard work go through the roller like this, but seriously, sometimes it is needed. Especially in cases like this, where a mountain is being created out of a mole hill.
203:
253:, other singles from the parent album ("Take a Bow" and "Rehab"), or tours that Rihanna has been on, with the song "Breakin' Dishes" only receiving passing mention in all of these articles. That is not defined as
96:
406:
156:
391:
101:
594:
That's a very good point but to me it must be discouraging to write it up to GA standards only for a year or 2 later to be deleted, But yeah we'll have to agree to disagree. –
91:
197:
163:
428:. This article is ridiculous in its synthesis of sources and adding content which not even remotely close to being critical responses. Seriously lacks notability. —
235:
261:
This song charted at #4 on the US club charts, and while ranking on a national music chart is listed at NSONG as a factor that "suggest that a song or single
483:
Not notable: barely any coverage in third party, reliable sources. The amount of trivial padding in the live performances section is ridiculous.
359:
129:
124:
133:
680:
non-single has attracted this attention... Also, this articles attracts on average 675 views per month based on the last three months;
810:
790:
760:
741:
Given the article has passed a GA review I'd like to see a stronger consensus before deleting or redirecting and protecting. Regards,
729:
690:
640:
615:
585:
556:
522:
492:
475:
443:
413:
398:
382:
74:
17:
116:
667:, your use of the ping template only works for Tomica and Cirt. I, for instance, was not informed or notified about this AFD. —
218:
752:
721:
581:
378:
355:
185:
468:
56:
829:
365:
It should also be noted that this song has been individually brought to AfD twice before, and was deleted both times. –
40:
265:
be notable", "a standalone article should still satisfy the aforementioned criteria" of "be the subject of multiple,
179:
175:
66:
225:
825:
786:
756:
725:
410:
395:
333:
120:
36:
781:
number of GAs that were subsequently deleted at AfD, including songs, because they weren't notable.
748:
717:
608:
577:
549:
515:
374:
351:
317:
306:
211:
773:
700:
565:
254:
242:
462:
450:
238:
of 20 Rihanna song articles was closed as keep with no prejudice against individual nominations.
51:
191:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
824:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
807:
782:
488:
112:
80:
777:
246:
71:
329:
743:
712:
685:
668:
662:
626:
595:
571:
536:
502:
429:
368:
345:
286:
675:
As the senior editor in charge wants a better consensus as it passed GAN: I change to
456:
337:
294:
681:
298:
290:
150:
800:
484:
342:
All of you participated in the previous AfD and are invited back for this one. –
325:
282:
302:
703:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
313:
321:
454:
per WP:NSONGS. The synthesis IndianBio brought up is also concerning.
249:
problems here. The sources here are all about the song's parent album
818:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
407:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
146:
142:
138:
210:
97:
Articles for deletion/Breakin' Dishes (2nd nomination)
392:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
710:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
224:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
832:). No further edits should be made to this page.
659:- Because it has been deleted two times before.
258:article about the song should not be created."
8:
405:Note: This debate has been included in the
390:Note: This debate has been included in the
102:Articles for deletion/Breakin' Dishes (song)
404:
389:
501:to GGGB as no evidence of notability .–
89:
92:Articles for deletion/Breakin' Dishes
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
274:independent of the artist and label
87:
271:published works whose sources are
24:
1:
811:15:05, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
791:17:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
761:11:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
730:11:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
691:13:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
673:10:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
641:07:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
616:19:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
586:19:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
557:14:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
523:03:56, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
493:09:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
476:06:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
444:04:56, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
414:20:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
399:20:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
383:20:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
360:20:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
75:11:18, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
849:
821:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
86:AfDs for this article:
79:
255:significant coverage
451:Good Girl Gone Bad
251:Good Girl Gone Bad
52:Good Girl Gone Bad
48:The result was
732:
416:
401:
57:non-admin closure
840:
823:
809:
805:
709:
705:
688:
671:
666:
638:
637:
613:
605:
600:
554:
546:
541:
520:
512:
507:
471:
465:
459:
441:
440:
341:
334:Michael Bednarek
310:
241:There are major
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
73:
69:
64:
34:
848:
847:
843:
842:
841:
839:
838:
837:
836:
830:deletion review
819:
801:
799:
798:. Per Davey. —
739:Relist comment:
698:
686:
669:
660:
633:
632:
627:
609:
601:
596:
550:
542:
537:
516:
508:
503:
469:
463:
457:
436:
435:
430:
311:
280:
171:
162:
127:
113:Breakin' Dishes
111:
108:
106:
84:
81:Breakin' Dishes
67:
62:
60:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
846:
844:
835:
834:
814:
813:
793:
763:
735:
734:
733:
707:
706:
695:
694:
693:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
628:
619:
618:
589:
588:
560:
559:
527:
526:
495:
478:
446:
431:
418:
417:
402:
386:
385:
307:Rhododendrites
232:
231:
168:
107:
105:
104:
99:
94:
88:
85:
83:
78:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
845:
833:
831:
827:
822:
816:
815:
812:
808:
806:
804:
797:
794:
792:
788:
784:
779:
775:
771:
767:
764:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
745:
740:
737:
736:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:
708:
704:
702:
697:
696:
692:
689:
683:
678:
674:
672:
664:
658:
654:
653:
642:
639:
636:
631:
623:
622:
621:
620:
617:
614:
612:
606:
604:
599:
593:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
567:
564:
563:
562:
561:
558:
555:
553:
547:
545:
540:
534:
531:
530:
529:
528:
525:
524:
521:
519:
513:
511:
506:
500:
496:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
477:
474:
472:
466:
460:
453:
452:
447:
445:
442:
439:
434:
427:
423:
420:
419:
415:
412:
408:
403:
400:
397:
393:
388:
387:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
364:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
347:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
278:
276:
275:
270:
269:
264:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
82:
77:
76:
72:
70:
65:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
820:
817:
802:
795:
769:
765:
742:
738:
711:
699:
676:
656:
655:
634:
629:
610:
602:
597:
570:
569:
551:
543:
538:
532:
517:
509:
504:
498:
497:
480:
455:
449:Redirect to
448:
437:
432:
425:
421:
411:NorthAmerica
396:NorthAmerica
367:
366:
344:
343:
279:
273:
272:
267:
266:
262:
260:
250:
240:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
783:BlueMoonset
772:: Definite
268:non-trivial
198:free images
330:Suriel1981
826:talk page
774:WP:NSONGS
744:Callanecc
713:Callanecc
663:Chasewc91
287:Calvin999
234:Previous
37:talk page
828:or in a
770:Redirect
753:contribs
722:contribs
701:Relisted
682:see here
582:contribs
499:Redirect
481:Redirect
458:Snuggums
422:Redirect
379:contribs
356:contribs
338:3family6
318:Lukeno94
295:SNUGGUMS
157:View log
39:or in a
630:Indian:
433:Indian:
336:, and
305:, and
299:Rlendog
291:Lugnuts
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
803:Tomíca
778:WP:GNG
766:Delete
684:. —
657:Delete
611:(talk)
552:(talk)
518:(talk)
485:Adabow
326:Status
283:Tomica
243:NSONGS
176:Google
134:delete
63:Steven
687:₳aron
670:₳aron
598:Davey
572:Chase
539:Davey
505:Davey
470:edits
369:Chase
346:Chase
303:Gloss
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
68:Zhang
16:<
796:Keep
787:talk
776:and
757:logs
749:talk
726:logs
718:talk
677:Keep
603:2010
578:talk
544:2010
533:Keep
510:2010
489:talk
464:talk
426:GGGB
375:talk
352:talk
314:Cirt
245:and
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
768:or
635:BIO
438:BIO
424:to
322:Kww
277:."
263:may
247:GNG
236:AfD
226:TWL
155:– (
789:)
759:)
755:•
751:•
728:)
724:•
720:•
607:•
584:)
580:/
548:•
514:•
491:)
467:/
409:.
394:.
381:)
377:/
358:)
354:/
332:,
328:,
324:,
320:,
316:,
301:,
297:,
293:,
289:,
285:,
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
59:)
785:(
747:(
716:(
665::
661:@
625:—
576:(
568:–
487:(
473:)
461:(
373:(
350:(
340::
312:@
309::
281:@
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.