371:
assume that some of you are probably even friends or associated with the article's main subject or the free advertising contained within the article linking to subpar art websites and other unremarkable "curators" (i.e. dolts who like to think they are important enough to be notable in an online encyclopedia). If the users who asked to keep this article are not part of a biased little army then you are all just stupid, plainly put, as it clearly shows by you lack of reasoning to keep the article. Thanks for unveiling yourselves as morons. In closing, I don't really give a shit if this article is deleted or not because now I know who's who and what's what in the scheme of things and it was pretty fun to see other people's weak retorts and attempts to stifle a wikinoob the likes of me. Thanks faggots! lol :D
262:. Debated in depth last time and the article improved considerably during that debate. Nom's reasons are either inaccurate, dubious or editing concerns not deletion reasons, even assuming they are correct in the first place, which I don't think they are to any substantial degree. Does the nom have any explanation to reassure other editors about this AfD being his first and only edits to wikipedia?
370:
Hey guys, way to divert attention away from the reasons why the articles does not meet wikipedia's content policy and that the article was in fact clearly authored by the person it is about.. You did this by pointing out my lack of wikipedo experience. Well good for you. Also, I will go as far to
82:
200:
149:
Entry is non-biographical in nature, conflict of interest, obvious self-promotion, blantant advertising and lack of content neutrality. Content is not suitable for an encyclopedia.
142:
223:
77:
167:
If this AFD should go ahead and someone established wants to endorse it, fair enough; but I'd be inclined to scrap this as a bad-faith nomination.
372:
17:
178:
109:
104:
113:
380:
362:
332:
311:
289:
272:
254:
236:
212:
190:
158:
61:
96:
49:
395:
36:
186:
394:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
376:
299:
172:
154:
360:
57:
168:
150:
208:
182:
285:
328:
100:
343:. Passed previous AfD which nom seemingly ignores. Lack of edits scares me, but even assuming
307:
250:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
338:
348:
53:
204:
344:
281:
324:
265:
229:
92:
67:
303:
246:
130:
323:. Passed AFD with a substantial keep decision not that long ago.
388:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
245:
per very full debate last time. Nom seems er, inappropriate.
137:
126:
122:
118:
83:
Articles for deletion/Brian
Sherwin (2nd nomination)
201:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:I get the feeling that I've been here before...
8:
347:, the article has enough sources for me.
222:: This debate has been included in the
199:: This debate has been included in the
75:
224:list of Visual arts-related deletions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
78:Articles for deletion/Brian Sherwin
74:
24:
181:) has made no previous edits.
1:
62:00:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
381:21:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
363:02:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
333:22:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
312:13:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
290:13:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
273:02:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
255:01:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
237:01:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
213:00:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
191:19:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
159:18:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
415:
391:Please do not modify it.
298:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
302:. It is listed now.
44:The result was
357:
353:
239:
215:
50:non-admin closure
406:
393:
358:
355:
351:
268:
232:
218:
195:
140:
134:
116:
34:
414:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
396:deletion review
389:
349:
266:
230:
183:Gordonofcartoon
136:
107:
91:
88:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
412:
410:
401:
400:
384:
383:
373:207.225.250.46
365:
335:
317:
316:
315:
314:
293:
292:
275:
257:
240:
216:
193:
147:
146:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
411:
399:
397:
392:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
346:
342:
340:
336:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
318:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
274:
271:
270:
269:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
238:
235:
234:
233:
225:
221:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
156:
152:
144:
139:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:Brian Sherwin
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
68:Brian Sherwin
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
390:
387:
367:
337:
320:
277:
264:
263:
259:
242:
228:
227:
219:
196:
175:
164:
148:
45:
43:
31:
28:
169:Nemjersatyr
151:Nemjersatyr
54:Ron Ritzman
300:incomplete
205:Erwin85Bot
282:Modernist
339:Snowball
325:23skidoo
179:contribs
143:View log
368:Comment
304:DumbBOT
247:Johnbod
165:Comment
110:protect
105:history
138:delete
114:delete
345:WP:GF
141:) – (
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
377:talk
356:ANDA
352:ARTH
341:Keep
329:talk
321:Keep
308:talk
286:talk
278:Keep
260:Keep
251:talk
243:Keep
226:. –
220:Note
209:talk
203:. --
197:Note
187:talk
173:talk
155:talk
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
46:keep
48:. (
379:)
331:)
310:)
288:)
267:Ty
253:)
231:Ty
211:)
189:)
157:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:)
375:(
354:P
350:D
327:(
306:(
284:(
249:(
207:(
185:(
176:·
171:(
153:(
145:)
135:(
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.