Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/British independence (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

272:. Britain, in any of the time that it has been unified, has always been independent, and if this is (as obviously) about Britain's relationship with the European Union the fact that such independence always existed is confirmed by the fact that the UK has the right to leave the EU without asking permission from anyone else. None of the linked articles contains anything that could be possibly called "British independence". 20:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 481: 230:
and the poorly supported promotion of a neologistic term. None of the terms listed in its new dab-page rebirth is notably referred to as "British independence".The use in the referendum context was comprehensively dismissed in the Afd debate. The idea that English, Scottish or Welsh independence is
479:
The page with the title "British independence" should be a dab page because it's not clear whether it should redirect to the Brexit process, the vote, or the aftermath page. Also, contrary to what others have said, it does seem like the phrase
231:
ever termed British independence is contradictory and illogical as well as plain incorrect. There was no such entity as Britain to become independent on the departure of Rome. And some obscure fantasists in the English Midlands, seriously?
223: 465:. But that's unrelated to the current quasi-dab content here, so deletion is still warranted. And I'm not so naive as to believe that redirect could be implemented without drama (or likely maintained without protection). 187: 86: 553:
This is an absurd dab page. It may well be that some politicians use the term without explaining what they mean by it, but you could say the same about many other terms used in politics - "British democracy" for a
356: 376: 219: 81: 181: 140: 394:
However deplorable the term may be, surely no one can argue that "British independence" is a name uses for Brexit, and possibly other things.--02:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
336: 147: 113: 108: 117: 433:
A fringe term among an an isolationist minority perhaps but not in common use and not a likely search term when most people will use "brexit".
100: 563: 545: 493: 474: 456: 442: 428: 388: 368: 348: 327: 310: 262: 240: 65: 526: 279: 411: 61: 202: 169: 17: 470: 306: 424: 384: 364: 344: 163: 297:
at this title aren't mystically resolved by making a disambiguation page consisting of entries that are, at best,
582: 159: 40: 249:
seems particularly unconvincing and perverse. By the same token, do the three subsections now mean independence
466: 302: 104: 522: 438: 283: 209: 57: 541: 420: 380: 360: 340: 323: 96: 71: 578: 489: 452: 407: 258: 236: 36: 514: 275: 195: 175: 518: 434: 53: 559: 537: 319: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
485: 448: 403: 254: 232: 227: 301:. This is an effort to push use of a term, not the intended purpose of disambiguation. 415: 298: 555: 134: 511:
per all the above. Not a likely search anyway. This is seeking to evade AfD.
461:
Personally, I wouldn't be entirely averse to a redirect from this title to
318:. This ain't no dab page, even if you squint really, really, really hard. 224:
Aftermath of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016
462: 222:
and deleted just a few days ago for it's nature as a POV-fork of
218:
This title, in the form of an article rather than a dab page was
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
484:
by reliable sources to describe independence from the Romans.--
87:
Articles for deletion/British independence (2nd nomination)
414:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this 447:"Not a likely search term" You guys are joking right?- - 246: 130: 126: 122: 194: 293:. The fundamental problems raised in the AFD for the 357:
list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions
377:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 585:). No further edits should be made to this page. 337:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 208: 8: 375:Note: This debate has been included in the 355:Note: This debate has been included in the 335:Note: This debate has been included in the 512: 374: 354: 334: 273: 82:Articles for deletion/British independence 79: 7: 78: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 253:England, Wales and Scotland? 564:12:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC) 546:12:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 494:23:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 475:17:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC) 457:21:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 443:08:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 429:11:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 389:02:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 369:02:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 349:02:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 328:00:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 311:21:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 263:22:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 241:20:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC) 66:05:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC) 247:This attempt at redefintion 602: 574:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 536:. Totally misleading. 77:AfDs for this article: 400:Note to closing admin 299:partial title matches 97:British independence 72:British independence 467:Squeamish Ossifrage 303:Squeamish Ossifrage 530: 517:comment added by 421:Shawn in Montreal 419: 391: 381:Shawn in Montreal 371: 361:Shawn in Montreal 351: 341:Shawn in Montreal 287: 278:comment added by 593: 576: 397: 213: 212: 198: 150: 138: 120: 34: 601: 600: 596: 595: 594: 592: 591: 590: 589: 583:deletion review 572: 226:, replete with 155: 146: 111: 95: 92: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 599: 597: 588: 587: 567: 566: 548: 531: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 431: 392: 372: 352: 331: 330: 313: 288: 266: 265: 216: 215: 152: 91: 90: 89: 84: 76: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 598: 586: 584: 580: 575: 569: 568: 565: 561: 557: 552: 549: 547: 543: 539: 535: 532: 528: 524: 520: 519:Charlesdrakew 516: 510: 507: 506: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482:has been used 478: 477: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 459: 458: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 430: 426: 422: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 396: 395: 393: 390: 386: 382: 378: 373: 370: 366: 362: 358: 353: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 332: 329: 325: 321: 317: 314: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 289: 285: 281: 280:86.17.222.157 277: 271: 268: 267: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 238: 234: 229: 225: 221: 211: 207: 204: 201: 197: 193: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 161: 158: 157:Find sources: 153: 149: 145: 142: 136: 132: 128: 124: 119: 115: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 93: 88: 85: 83: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 62:contributions 59: 55: 54:Jo-Jo Eumerus 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 573: 570: 550: 538:This is Paul 533: 513:— Preceding 508: 399: 320:Clarityfiend 315: 294: 290: 274:— Preceding 269: 250: 217: 205: 199: 191: 184: 178: 172: 166: 156: 143: 49: 47: 31: 28: 486:Prisencolin 449:Prisencolin 404:Prisencolin 255:Mutt Lunker 233:Mutt Lunker 182:free images 579:talk page 37:talk page 581:or in a 554:start.-- 527:contribs 515:unsigned 412:contribs 276:unsigned 228:WP:SYNTH 141:View log 39:or in a 556:Mhockey 435:Charles 295:article 188:WP refs 176:scholar 114:protect 109:history 551:Delete 534:Delete 509:Delete 463:Brexit 316:Delete 291:Delete 270:Delete 220:Afd-ed 160:Google 118:delete 50:delete 203:JSTOR 164:books 148:Stats 135:views 127:watch 123:links 16:< 560:talk 542:talk 523:talk 490:talk 471:talk 453:talk 439:talk 425:talk 408:talk 385:talk 365:talk 345:talk 324:talk 307:talk 284:talk 259:talk 251:from 237:talk 196:FENS 170:news 131:logs 105:talk 101:edit 58:talk 416:XfD 210:TWL 139:– ( 52:. 562:) 544:) 529:) 525:• 492:) 473:) 455:) 441:) 427:) 418:. 410:• 402:: 398:— 387:) 379:. 367:) 359:. 347:) 339:. 326:) 309:) 286:) 261:) 239:) 190:) 133:| 129:| 125:| 121:| 116:| 112:| 107:| 103:| 64:) 60:, 558:( 540:( 521:( 488:( 469:( 451:( 437:( 423:( 406:( 383:( 363:( 343:( 322:( 305:( 282:( 257:( 235:( 214:) 206:· 200:· 192:· 185:· 179:· 173:· 167:· 162:( 154:( 151:) 144:· 137:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Jo-Jo Eumerus
talk
contributions
05:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
British independence
Articles for deletion/British independence
Articles for deletion/British independence (2nd nomination)
British independence
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.