300:
document. To my way of thinking, that means, pure drivel, a POV rant, a subject that is inherently impossible to cite, etc... This page is none of these. In order for
Knowledge (XXG) to succeed, we need to be tolerant of content that does not fit into our own image of what constitutes an encyclopedia. One person's view of trivia will be another person's dissertation topic. As Knowledge (XXG) is not paper, we can make a home for virtually any topic that can be cited and presented in an NPOV way. The alternative, deletionist approach will just create rancor and bad feelings while diverting all of our attention from more important tasks. --
299:
mainly focuses on trivia sections, and recommends that they be integrated into articles whenever possible. I am not opposed to deleting things, I am a deletionist at CfD discussion. But at AfD, I only believe an article should be deleted if it is clear that there is no way to create a reasonable
48:. The first two keep arguments are not grounded in policy or guidelines; another one is invalid because the previous AFD was properly referenced by another user. Aside from those there appears to be a clear consensus to delete. --
162:
115:
295:. I don't think there is yet a workable definition of "trivia" that has community consensus. Without such a consensus, I think calling an article "trivial" is not a reason to delete. Even the page at
157:
I recalled seeing this article here before, and yes my memory isn't failing me (yet). This article was listed before at afd on March 14, 2006 with result no consensus; in looking for the archive on
360:
that the nominator saw the need to rename the previous discussion to make room for this new one, and didn't know to disclose its existence. The error was promptly corrected by another editor. --
439:—there are articles on viral videos, but this particular topic does not seem to be the subject of any non-trivial coverage, at least not any referenced. As such, this is irredeemable OR.
320:
Lots of films and TV shows are parodied all the time, without their own parody lists. As mentioned above, just about everything in here can be merged into different articles or the main
165:. Not disclosing the prior debate (even though it ended with no consensus) is bad form; but moving archived debates around so that it will be difficult to find them is worse.
158:
119:
88:
83:
92:
456:
The parodies are old news, as is the case with the film. It's been, what, two years since "Brokeback
Mountain"? Nobody says "I'm Batman!" anymore either.
75:
189:
Uncited trivia. If any can be referenced as notable due to non-trivial third party coverage, then perhaps those could remain, but doubt enough to justify
384:
Ugh again! Its a well known phenom and here are a few sources I found after one, yes one minuet of searching google news let alone anything else!
393:
17:
460:
448:
427:
405:
374:
351:
339:
312:
285:
270:
256:
231:
219:
207:
181:
169:
149:
132:
57:
36:
79:
71:
63:
444:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
333:
385:
215:
As trivia list, although some content can be merged to various articles mostly notably the main article.--
126:
unsourced, one of the only links makes no mention of
Brokeback Mountain, sounds like OR, not a directory.
227:
I just don't get deletionists. What an interesting treasure trove this article is. Why not keep it?
402:
425:
372:
254:
205:
440:
348:
325:
166:
52:
296:
266:
was a media trend, has some references (although lack of references is no reason for deletion). --
142:
321:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
357:
414:
361:
243:
228:
194:
301:
276:
410:
Nothing was removed - looks like you first left a comment on the previous debate's page
457:
146:
49:
178:
389:
281:
216:
159:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Log/2006_March_14#Brokeback_Mountain_parodies
128:
347:
due to the nominator's failure to properly reference the original AfD discussion.
109:
392:
both are from This month (July 6th and 25th 2007 respectively). Hell just google
239:
305:
267:
163:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brokeback
Mountain parodies (old)
161:
I found that the archived debate had been removed and moved to:
324:
article - if completely necessary, which most of it isn't. •
411:
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
238:Interesting treasure troves belong on
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
401:p.s. why was my comment removed??--
24:
396:and you will see what one means.
1:
394:"Brokeback Mountain" parodies
242:; this is an encyclopedia. --
72:Brokeback Mountain parodies
64:Brokeback Mountain parodies
478:
386:The history of viral video
116:previous deletion proposal
58:04:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
461:01:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
449:23:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
428:19:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
406:09:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
375:14:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
352:11:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
340:06:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
313:06:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
286:14:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
271:05:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
257:03:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
232:02:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
220:01:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
208:00:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
182:23:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
170:23:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
150:17:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
133:16:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
390:Film review: Cowabungle!
32:Please do not modify it.
193:a separate list. --
322:Brokeback Mountain
358:assume good faith
338:
141:- Mostly uncited
469:
423:
417:
370:
364:
336:
332:
330:
311:
252:
246:
203:
197:
113:
95:
55:
34:
477:
476:
472:
471:
470:
468:
467:
466:
465:
421:
415:
368:
362:
356:I'm willing to
345:Procedural keep
334:
326:
309:
250:
244:
201:
195:
86:
70:
67:
53:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
475:
473:
464:
463:
451:
433:
432:
431:
430:
398:
397:
379:
378:
377:
342:
315:
290:
289:
288:
260:
259:
235:
234:
222:
210:
184:
177:Trivia list.
172:
167:Carlossuarez46
152:
124:
123:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
474:
462:
459:
455:
452:
450:
447:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
429:
426:
424:
420:
412:
409:
408:
407:
404:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
376:
373:
371:
367:
359:
355:
354:
353:
350:
349:Andy Saunders
346:
343:
341:
337:
331:
329:
323:
319:
316:
314:
308:
307:
303:
298:
294:
291:
287:
284:
283:
278:
274:
273:
272:
269:
265:
262:
261:
258:
255:
253:
249:
241:
237:
236:
233:
230:
226:
223:
221:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
200:
192:
188:
185:
183:
180:
176:
173:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
151:
148:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
130:
121:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
453:
443:
436:
418:
381:
365:
344:
327:
317:
304:
292:
280:
263:
247:
224:
212:
198:
190:
186:
174:
154:
138:
127:
125:
45:
43:
31:
28:
403:UKPhoenix79
310:uelWantman
229:Scarykitty
458:Mandsford
441:Cool Hand
297:WP:TRIVIA
277:yes it is
240:Geocities
191:an entire
147:Oli Filth
179:Pharmboy
120:View log
217:JForget
89:protect
84:history
454:Delete
437:Delete
318:Delete
275:Uh...
213:Delete
187:Delete
175:Delete
143:trivia
139:Delete
93:delete
46:delete
328:97198
155:Note:
118:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
54:desat
16:<
445:Luke
419:Zala
413:. --
388:and
382:Keep
366:Zala
335:talk
293:Keep
282:Will
264:Keep
248:Zala
225:Keep
199:Zala
129:Will
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
50:Core
422:Bim
416:Zim
369:Bim
363:Zim
306:Sam
268:Qyd
251:Bim
245:Zim
202:Bim
196:Zim
145:.
302:☑
279:.
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
122:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.