Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Browns Canon, Colorado - Knowledge

Source 📝

355: 354:: In deprodding, the original author of this article said "why does Knowledge have to have a higher standard for notability," which is still a question we can ask after 20 years of this project. But still, putting that aside, I see "Browns Canon" is listed as a subdivision of Chaffee County on the 1930 U.S. census and at least as far back at 1900. 377:
Post offices and census-tracts are not evidence of legal recognition. One is a business that could be operated off someone's porch, or as part of a store, the other is simply an accounting-unit for population within a larger community.
237:
Deprodded with "Notable enough to have a page in the Geographic Names Information System; why does Knowledge have to have a higher standard for notability?" Yes, Knowledge does in fact have a higher standard for notability because the
206: 242:
does not determine notability at all, it's merely a database of any name that has ever appeared on a map. They have no discretion in determining "notability" and quite frequently make mistakes in their classification! The
200: 163: 281: 296: 110: 136: 131: 95: 140: 123: 247:
that the GNIS took its data from clearly shows just a site on the railroad. Several newspapers.com results mentioning the location near
221: 188: 403: 313: 90: 83: 53: 17: 182: 421: 387: 366: 346: 329: 303: 288: 271: 255: 167: 127: 104: 100: 65: 178: 438: 244: 40: 228: 357:. It also had a post office from 1888-98 and 1904-08. So it may well be notable, I haven't dug too much.-- 268: 119: 71: 434: 36: 194: 413: 214: 265: 342: 79: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
433:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
61: 383: 325: 317: 239: 407: 359: 300: 285: 252: 248: 338: 157: 57: 379: 321: 251:, often as "Browns canon" with lowercase c, without establishing notability. 429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153: 149: 145: 213: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 441:). No further edits should be made to this page. 295:Note: This discussion has been included in the 280:Note: This discussion has been included in the 410:unless significant sourcing can be uncovered. ~ 282:list of Geography-related deletion discussions 297:list of Colorado-related deletion discussions 227: 8: 111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 294: 279: 7: 24: 96:Introduction to deletion process 404:Browns Canyon National Monument 314:Browns Canyon National Monument 54:Browns Canyon National Monument 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 422:01:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC) 388:10:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 367:22:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 347:19:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 330:15:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 304:01:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 289:01:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 272:11:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 256:01:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC) 66:01:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 86:(AfD)? Read these primers! 458: 337:Fails WP:GNG and GEOLAND. 431:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 168:edits since nomination 120:Browns Canon, Colorado 72:Browns Canon, Colorado 84:Articles for deletion 365: 306: 291: 101:Guide to deletion 91:How to contribute 449: 416: 364: 264:per nomination. 232: 231: 217: 161: 143: 81: 34: 457: 456: 452: 451: 450: 448: 447: 446: 445: 439:deletion review 414: 174: 134: 118: 115: 78: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 455: 453: 444: 443: 425: 424: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 370: 369: 349: 332: 307: 292: 276: 275: 235: 234: 171: 114: 113: 108: 98: 93: 76: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 454: 442: 440: 436: 432: 427: 426: 423: 419: 418: 417: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 389: 385: 381: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 362: 361: 356: 353: 350: 348: 344: 340: 336: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 308: 305: 302: 298: 293: 290: 287: 283: 278: 277: 273: 270: 267: 266:Jeffrey Beall 263: 260: 259: 258: 257: 254: 250: 249:Browns Canyon 246: 241: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 169: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 116: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 85: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 430: 428: 412: 411: 399: 358: 351: 334: 309: 261: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 77: 49: 47: 31: 28: 201:free images 435:talk page 37:talk page 437:or in a 400:Redirect 360:Milowent 318:WP:CHEAP 310:Redirect 301:Reywas92 286:Reywas92 253:Reywas92 245:topo map 164:View log 105:glossary 50:redirect 39:or in a 352:Comment 339:Avilich 240:WP:GNIS 207:WP refs 195:scholar 137:protect 132:history 82:New to 408:WP:ATD 335:Delete 269:(talk) 262:Delete 179:Google 141:delete 58:Daniel 380:FOARP 322:FOARP 222:JSTOR 183:books 158:views 150:watch 146:links 16:< 415:EDDY 406:per 384:talk 343:talk 326:talk 316:per 215:FENS 189:news 154:logs 128:talk 124:edit 62:talk 402:to 312:to 229:TWL 162:– ( 52:to 420:~ 386:) 363:• 345:) 328:) 320:. 299:. 284:. 209:) 166:| 156:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 64:) 56:. 398:' 382:( 341:( 324:( 274:. 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 160:) 122:( 107:) 103:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Browns Canyon National Monument
Daniel
talk
01:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Browns Canon, Colorado

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Browns Canon, Colorado
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.