495:
think my teeth looked a little lighter after brushing, so it seemed that the whitening setting was somewhat effective. I also liked that it has a light that flashes red when the toothbrush is running low on charge — my old electric toothbrushes would always get slower and slower as the charge died, and it’s great that this one gives you a heads-up.
457:
additional whitening capabilities. As dentists quoted in a report in
Scienceline pointed out “there’s simply not enough evidence to back the promises made for using charcoal for oral hygiene.” This isn’t because all dentists are convinced brushing with charcoal is bad, it’s rather that there hasn’t been enough research done into the topic.
740:
This is spam. The content appears to have been taken from the company's PR material (I mean, 25,000 "ambassadors", c'mon!). Cunard has found some mentioned of the company but even by his own admission there is next to nothing written about *the company* and instead there appears to be coverage of the
779:
the sentence about "ambassadors" from "As of
January 2020, the company has over 25,000 ambassadors across the US, all of who are dental professionals" to "As of January 2020, the company recruited roughly 25,000 dentists and dental hygienists in the United States to champion their merchandise in the
494:
Another really ticklish toothbrush! But slightly less ticklish than the Boka, despite its higher rate of vibrations per minute. The vibrations on the sensitive setting were a bit less intense, and I’m not sure if the massage setting really felt that different from the whitening one. That said, I did
525:
The review notes: "So, what makes the Burst Sonic
Toothbrush so special? Thanks to the brand’s sonic technology, it has one of the most powerful motors in the industry. The brush gives off 33,000 vibrations per minute, allowing it to better clean hard-to-reach areas and deeply polish your teeth
456:
The Burst is a bit pricier than some of the other subscription-based toothbrushes we considered. ... One thing about the Burst does give us slight pause: it’s “charcoal infused” bristles. Burst and many companies that make charcoal infused toothpaste claim that charcoal gives the toothbrush
231:
Promo piece created by a single-purpose IP editor. The references aren't what they seem: the Forbes articles are from the 'sites' section (= not RS), the
Chicago Tribune one was written by a product review publication, the CNN one is similar, the Bizjournals piece is mostly about the GS-led
585:
The article spends 12 paragraphs to discuss Burst. It discusses the company: "Burst Oral Care was founded in 2017 as a way to “fuse together the offline and the online” personal care market, according to cofounders
Brittany Stewart and Hamish Khayat. ... Burst is a DTC company—that’s
555:
The author provides analysis: "Burst is a more affordable alternative that ultimately gives me the same clean feeling as my
Sonicare at a much better value, and I don't have to remember to go out and buy or change brush heads, which, for a forgetful fool such as I, is a huge
419:
The review notes: "The Good: Lifetime warranty, Three brushing modes, Nice design. The Bad: On the more expensive side, Small brush head. The Bottom Line: Burst does a good job, and the brand stands behind its product with a lifetime warranty that replaces broken brushes for
232:
investment round, and the Dental
Tribune 'article' is a product launch announcement straight from the company's marketing department. The closest thing to RS is the Wired article, but that's about the product category, and mentions Burst only alongside many other brands.
589:
It also discusses the product: "Burst’s latest oral care product, the one the company shipped to me, is floss. This is not just any floss. It’s expanding, charcoal-coated, mint-and-eucalyptus flavored, antimicrobial
200:
235:
As for the two awards, the
Stevies are of dubious notability, to put it mildly, and the London Design Award went to the branding agency for creating the brand image and packaging etc., not to Burst per se.
741:
products (and even that coverage is PR-driven for the most part). The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of
620:
161:
586:
direct-to-consumer, similar to how makeup company
Glossier and luggage company Away are eschewing traditional retail channels and selling their stuff through their own websites."
292:
682:
Most of the sources are about the Burst product and brand instead of about the company, so I would support reframing the article to be about the brand instead of the company.
264:
278:
194:
93:
757:. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
108:
375:
411:
is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.
647:
367:
755:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
464:
632:
532:
426:
596:
821:
Given the sources presented by Cunard, a third relist to try and establish consensus seems appropriate and justifiable for a 3rd relist.
134:
129:
138:
88:
81:
17:
789:
the article's first sentence to make it be about the brand, not the company, since the sources focus on the brand, not the company.
408:
533:"I tried the Burst toothbrush made popular by the viral 'corn test' video — here's how it stacked up against my Philips Sonicare"
121:
659:
628:
502:
215:
712:(276-word review) that also discuss other electric toothbrushes. These sources can still be used to establish notability per
182:
102:
98:
810:
655:
335:
308:
869:
40:
562:
176:
383:
852:
833:
800:
767:
727:
672:
414:
The guideline notes that "significant coverage" "does not need to be the main topic of the source material".
356:
326:
298:
284:
270:
256:
252:
172:
63:
713:
651:
396:
746:
865:
58:
36:
474:
222:
716:, which notes that "significant coverage" "does not need to be the main topic of the source material".
125:
848:
829:
704:
542:
469:
208:
750:
742:
416:
This article contains a 276-word review of Burst (and also discusses other electric toothbrushes).
792:
719:
664:
503:"The Internet's Most Reviewed Electric Toothbrush Is the Secret to Chrissy Teigen's Bright Smile"
322:
248:
758:
487:
The review contains a 318-word review of Burst (and also discusses other electric toothbrushes).
449:
The review contains a 476-word review of Burst (and also discusses other electric toothbrushes).
436:
686:
604:
507:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
864:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
244:
188:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
796:
723:
692:
668:
567:
537:
54:
240:
117:
69:
753:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include
844:
825:
347:
762:
318:
512:
155:
600:
572:
709:
379:
376:"How to select the right electric toothbrush subscription for you"
621:"Burst Oral Care gets more funding in round led by Goldman Sachs"
597:"Goldman Sachs backs electric toothbrush startup Burst Oral Care"
860:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
813:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
338:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
311:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
698:
431:
696:. Burst has received substantial coverage in articles in
786:
776:
714:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability#General notability guideline
652:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability#General notability guideline
397:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability#General notability guideline
151:
147:
143:
407:" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that
207:
366:
per the significant coverage in multiple independent
785:
The Burst brand has received substantial reviews. I
824:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
465:"I Tested Six New 'Start-up' Electric Toothbrushes"
344:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
317:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
221:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
872:). No further edits should be made to this page.
452:The review contains negative coverage of Burst:
291:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:Note: This discussion has been included in the
293:list of California-related deletion discussions
265:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
782:The rest of the article is neutrally written.
563:"Don't Brush Off Mouth Tech As a Passing Fad"
279:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
780:United States in exchange for compensation."
239:I don't think any of that adds up to either
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
427:"The 10 Best Electric Toothbrushes in 2020"
654:, which requires "significant coverage in
290:
276:
262:
684:Burst is the main subject of articles in
749:and (this bit is important!) containing
490:The review contains analysis of Burst:
747:in-depth information *on the company*
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
646:There is sufficient coverage in
94:Introduction to deletion process
629:American City Business Journals
425:Varghese, Daniel (2020-08-21).
526:without irritating your gums."
1:
327:01:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
299:08:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
285:08:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
271:08:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
257:07:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
853:18:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
834:02:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
801:05:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
561:Goode, Lauren (2020-01-24).
64:04:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
768:21:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
728:10:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
673:10:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
619:Chen, I-Chun (2020-05-06).
501:Warner, Alex (2020-06-17).
463:Reid, Hilary (2019-06-28).
374:Kern, Miller (2020-01-29).
357:13:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
889:
843:seems rather promotional.
595:Ha, Anthony (2020-05-06).
531:Burke, Owen (2020-05-27).
862:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
708:(318-word review), and
650:to allow Burst to pass
497:
459:
413:
751:"Independent Content"
492:
454:
401:
82:Articles for deletion
743:significant coverage
409:no original research
405:Significant coverage
702:(476-word review),
819:Relisting comment:
836:
359:
355:
329:
301:
287:
273:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
880:
823:
816:
814:
693:Business Insider
662:of the subject".
656:reliable sources
648:reliable sources
643:
641:
640:
631:. Archived from
615:
613:
612:
603:. Archived from
583:
581:
580:
571:. Archived from
553:
551:
550:
541:. Archived from
538:Business Insider
523:
521:
520:
511:. Archived from
485:
483:
482:
473:. Archived from
447:
445:
444:
435:. Archived from
394:
392:
391:
382:. Archived from
368:reliable sources
354:
352:
345:
343:
341:
339:
316:
314:
312:
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
62:
34:
888:
887:
883:
882:
881:
879:
878:
877:
876:
870:deletion review
837:
809:
807:
638:
636:
618:
610:
608:
594:
578:
576:
560:
548:
546:
530:
518:
516:
500:
480:
478:
462:
442:
440:
424:
389:
387:
373:
360:
348:
346:
334:
332:
330:
307:
305:
247:notability. --
168:
132:
118:Burst Oral Care
116:
113:
76:
73:
70:Burst Oral Care
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
886:
884:
875:
874:
856:
855:
822:
817:
806:
805:
804:
770:
734:
733:
732:
731:
677:
676:
645:
644:
616:
592:
558:
528:
498:
460:
422:
342:
331:
315:
304:
303:
302:
288:
274:
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
885:
873:
871:
867:
863:
858:
857:
854:
850:
846:
842:
839:
838:
835:
831:
827:
820:
815:
812:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
788:
783:
778:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
739:
736:
735:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
715:
711:
707:
706:
701:
700:
695:
694:
689:
688:
681:
680:
679:
678:
675:
674:
670:
666:
661:
657:
653:
649:
635:on 2021-01-04
634:
630:
626:
622:
617:
607:on 2021-01-04
606:
602:
598:
593:
591:
587:
575:on 2021-01-04
574:
570:
569:
564:
559:
557:
545:on 2021-01-04
544:
540:
539:
534:
529:
527:
515:on 2020-06-22
514:
510:
509:
504:
499:
496:
491:
488:
477:on 2021-01-04
476:
472:
471:
466:
461:
458:
453:
450:
439:on 2021-01-04
438:
434:
433:
428:
423:
421:
420:subscribers."
417:
412:
410:
406:
400:
398:
386:on 2021-01-04
385:
381:
377:
372:
371:
369:
365:
362:
361:
358:
353:
351:
340:
337:
328:
324:
320:
313:
310:
300:
297:
294:
289:
286:
283:
280:
275:
272:
269:
266:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
249:DoubleGrazing
246:
242:
237:
233:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
861:
859:
840:
818:
808:
791:
784:
781:
772:
763:
754:
737:
718:
703:
697:
691:
685:
683:
663:
637:. Retrieved
633:the original
624:
609:. Retrieved
605:the original
588:
584:
577:. Retrieved
573:the original
566:
554:
547:. Retrieved
543:the original
536:
524:
517:. Retrieved
513:the original
506:
493:
489:
486:
479:. Retrieved
475:the original
468:
455:
451:
448:
441:. Retrieved
437:the original
430:
418:
415:
404:
402:
395:
388:. Retrieved
384:the original
363:
349:
333:
306:
296:
282:
268:
238:
234:
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
75:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
660:independent
195:free images
639:2021-01-04
611:2021-01-04
601:TechCrunch
579:2021-01-04
549:2021-01-04
519:2021-01-04
481:2021-01-04
443:2021-01-04
390:2021-01-04
350:Sandstein
866:talk page
845:Oaktree b
826:Barkeep49
658:that are
55:Vanamonde
37:talk page
868:or in a
811:Relisted
787:reworded
777:reworded
773:Comment:
764:HighKing
759:WP:NCORP
710:Mashable
705:New York
625:L.A. Biz
556:relief."
470:New York
380:Mashable
336:Relisted
319:Missvain
309:Relisted
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
841:Comment
590:floss."
245:WP:CORP
201:WPÂ refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
793:Cunard
738:Delete
720:Cunard
687:People
665:Cunard
508:People
399:says:
241:WP:GNG
173:Google
139:delete
745:with
568:Wired
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
849:talk
830:talk
797:talk
724:talk
690:and
669:talk
364:Keep
323:talk
253:talk
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
59:Talk
243:or
223:TWL
160:– (
851:)
832:)
799:)
775:I
761:.
726:)
699:GQ
671:)
627:.
623:.
599:.
565:.
535:.
505:.
467:.
432:GQ
429:.
378:.
325:)
295:.
281:.
267:.
255:)
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
847:(
828:(
795:(
722:(
667:(
642:.
614:.
582:.
552:.
522:.
484:.
446:.
403:"
393:.
370:.
321:(
251:(
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.