423:, in that it needs to be demonstrated that there is significant coverage (about the company or record label in this case) in multiple independent secondary sources. The only reference provided doesn't even mention GP Records but rather relates to the acquisition of EMI Recorded Music by the Universal Music Group. The article states the label was formed as a business opportunity resulting from this transaction but provides no proof - clearly
323:'s sense of an important label, and illustrates quite well why that guideline says what it says. This article is basically a difficult-to-source but easy-to-populate list, a collation of artists with a noteworthy common feature, and one that would probably be trivial to source if it were American rather than Indonesian. That it is so poorly sourced, I am convinced, is more to do with the
52:. Consensus is it is not notable. Appreciate Chubbles' argument, and bias is certainly an issue to be contended with, project wide. However, without sourcing to back it up, there isn't an article to be had. If anyone wants this to work on in Draft to find and add sourcing, feel free to ping me. I don't see that happening with another week's relist/
414:
is inferring to the comment in the guidelines relating to artists having released two or more albums on an important indie label (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable). This does not state that this
508:
It may very well have described what it means by a "more important indie label" but only in the context of defining the criteria for notability for musicians and ensembles. It certainly wasn't intended to act as the entire criteria by which labels are evaluated for notability. Since it is a
431:
only provides results relating to medical records, however if you add
Indonesia to your search apart from the label's website the rest are hits on social media websites (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Spotify etc) none of which are considered reliable secondary sources.
419:- firstly "no company or organization is considered inherently notable" and secondly "A company is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it." The criteria which apply are no different from those under
564:. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. I have been unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria, topic fails
468:
Technically, I guess WP:NMUSIC does indeed define a "more important indie label" as "an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable".
206:
163:
327:
of our contributors and their skill sets than anything about the label itself. I'd change my vote if
Indonesian contributors told me this was just a promo puff piece;
298:
278:
200:
258:
490:
then if that is the case there needs to be reliable independent secondary sources that prove that. I've searched and can't find any. As it stands it is all
110:
95:
562:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
415:
is the criteria for a record label to be considered notable. The key requirement is whether the record label satisfies the criteria under
552:
Article relies entirely on primary sourcing. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with
90:
83:
17:
136:
131:
140:
221:
363:
454:
there is no evidence that the majority of the artists listed on the label's rooster are actually signed to GP Records.
188:
167:
123:
104:
100:
376:
349:
59:
591:
40:
359:
182:
587:
54:
36:
178:
574:
544:
519:
503:
478:
463:
441:
396:
367:
340:
310:
290:
270:
250:
65:
474:
127:
553:
499:
459:
437:
306:
286:
266:
246:
214:
228:
391:
336:
238:
119:
71:
540:
416:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
586:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
557:
565:
510:
487:
470:
407:
320:
560:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include
194:
495:
455:
433:
324:
302:
282:
262:
242:
569:
514:
420:
411:
386:
332:
536:
491:
451:
424:
157:
535:- Not notable . I can't find reliable sources through Google search for it.
241:, lacks significant coverage about the record label and why it is notable
410:
that specifically relates to record labels. I am presuming that
582:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
379:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
352:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
328:
153:
149:
145:
213:
385:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
358:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
594:). No further edits should be made to this page.
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
299:list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions
279:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
227:
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
296:
276:
259:list of Music-related deletion discussions
256:
556:and (this bit is important!) containing
509:commercial organization, that falls to
554:in-depth information *on the company*
7:
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
368:06:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
341:03:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
311:05:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
291:05:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
271:05:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
251:05:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
66:03:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
575:12:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
545:21:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
520:12:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
504:23:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
479:14:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
464:09:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
442:09:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
427:. Unfortunately a search of
397:09:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
319:. The label certainly meets
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
611:
584:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
406:, there is nothing in
168:edits since nomination
558:"Independent Content"
84:Articles for deletion
331:that won't happen.
360:Extraordinary Writ
329:something tells me
492:original research
425:original research
399:
370:
313:
293:
273:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
602:
394:
389:
384:
382:
380:
357:
355:
353:
232:
231:
217:
161:
143:
81:
64:
62:
57:
34:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
598:
592:deletion review
452:primary sources
392:
387:
375:
373:
348:
346:
174:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
60:
55:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
597:
596:
578:
577:
547:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
506:
482:
481:
445:
444:
383:
356:
344:
343:
314:
294:
274:
235:
234:
171:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
595:
593:
589:
585:
580:
579:
576:
573:
572:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
548:
546:
542:
538:
534:
531:
530:
521:
518:
517:
512:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
484:
483:
480:
476:
472:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
430:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
405:
402:
401:
400:
398:
395:
390:
381:
378:
371:
369:
365:
361:
354:
351:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
169:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
583:
581:
570:
561:
549:
532:
515:
428:
403:
374:
372:
347:
345:
316:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
450:Apart from
239:WP:NCOMPANY
201:free images
61:Mississippi
488:Geschichte
471:Geschichte
429:GP Records
417:WP:COMPANY
120:GP Records
72:GP Records
588:talk page
496:Dan arndt
456:Dan arndt
434:Dan arndt
303:Dan arndt
283:Dan arndt
263:Dan arndt
243:Dan arndt
37:talk page
590:or in a
571:HighKing
566:WP:NCORP
516:HighKing
511:WP:NCORP
412:Chubbles
408:WP:MUSIC
377:Relisted
350:Relisted
333:Chubbles
321:WP:MUSIC
164:View log
105:glossary
39:or in a
537:Mommmyy
404:Comment
325:WP:BIAS
207:WP refs
195:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
550:Delete
533:Delete
421:WP:GNG
393:plicit
237:Fails
179:Google
141:delete
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
541:talk
500:talk
475:talk
460:talk
438:talk
364:talk
337:talk
317:Keep
307:talk
287:talk
267:talk
247:talk
215:FENS
189:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
56:Star
229:TWL
162:– (
568:.
543:)
513:.
502:)
494:.
477:)
462:)
440:)
366:)
339:)
309:)
301:.
289:)
281:.
269:)
261:.
249:)
209:)
166:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
539:(
498:(
473:(
458:(
436:(
388:✗
362:(
335:(
305:(
285:(
265:(
245:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.