545:. He has multiple appearances in notable films where he has a significant roles. Three of the films he has had a role in have their own Knowledge (XXG) articles, meaning that they are notable. I haven't watched those films myself, but given that his roles are discussed in the cited articles, I would say that they are significant. It's clear that the article meets GNG. There are 13 cited sources, and although all of them are certainly not reliable, at least 5 are from reliable publications (LA Times, Houston Chronicle, local news). So, the article also meets verifiabilty. However, there is information in the article that isn't mentioned in the sources and isn't verifiable. I find it much more appropriate to remove the unverified information from the article than to delete it entirely. Specifically, the Personal Life section can be removed, along with some of the info in the Career section. I would also suggest removing the unreliable sources, such as the subject's personal webpage, and to remove irrelevant links in the Further Reading section.
505:
Just did some research and found out that he is also featured in latimes and the
Sanfransico chronicle (Added a couple links) . Two notable sources. So, this settles whether he is notable or not. Also he gave Ryan Gosling a run for his money at the red carpet. He is notable enough to pass the GNG
232:
non-notable child actor, the majority of the roles are unnamed or brief appearances lasting less than 3 minutes and there is no significant coverage. Perhaps too soon but the sourcing for a 12 year old child blp needs to be rock solid and they simply aren't here.
348:, with only two roles, to date, that might pass the first criterion. Given his young age, I tend to agree with the nominator; however, since he has soon-to-be-released projects, I'd have no problem with the article being moved to "draftspace".
428:- The fact that you said the roles are under 3 minutes is an assumption and not a fact and last time I checked the Houston Chronicle is notable and even has its own Wiki page. So yes that does count of press coverage.
201:
295:
154:
195:
255:. The article should not be deleted since the subject is yet to make more contributions hence the article can be expanded in the coming years. Thats my opinion.
86:
101:
520:
161:
463:, clearly notable and a GNG pass. Please take a look at the filmography and the many notable films in which he has appeared. He's been in
81:
74:
17:
127:
122:
131:
95:
91:
216:
114:
397:
366:
183:
449:
433:
588:
273:"Yet to make more contributions" is irrelevant, if he becomes notable, there will be an article, but we're not here to
40:
554:
550:
528:
511:
492:
320:
521:
https://www.sfchronicle.com/life/celebrities/article/Ryan-Gosling-s-biggest-red-carpet-competition-13329219.php
177:
445:
429:
382:
465:
487:, and many other noteworthy films and series, and will be appearing in many more notable films. Regards,
173:
584:
571:
532:
515:
496:
453:
437:
418:
388:
357:
324:
304:
286:
264:
260:
242:
56:
36:
546:
524:
507:
488:
316:
282:
251:
The subject mentioned above is a notable child actor. The article has met the requirements stated in
238:
483:
274:
223:
299:
209:
542:
345:
567:
377:
477:
118:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
583:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
471:
353:
256:
252:
278:
234:
189:
409:
444:
Also it could be moved to the draft space to see if these "lead roles" are legitimate.
563:
541:
After reading the cited articles, I think the subject meets all the requirements for
110:
62:
53:
148:
349:
562:
sufficient RS cover him to measure up to our inclusion criteria.
579:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
523:
refers to him as a costar not an extra or just an appearance.
400:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
369:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
506:
guidelines being he has reliable sources and press coverage.
296:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
144:
140:
136:
315:
the roles to date do not meet notability requirements.
208:
406:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
375:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
277:. Also what sources support your assertion of GNG?
222:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
591:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
293:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
340:getting coverage—for example, the
24:
87:Introduction to deletion process
344:article—but he may fall shy of
1:
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
608:
553:) 22:36, 8 September 2024
572:05:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
57:21:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
581:Please do not modify it.
533:16:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
516:14:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
497:01:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
454:05:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
438:05:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
419:17:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
389:09:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
358:02:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
325:19:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
305:17:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
287:15:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
265:15:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
243:14:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
75:Articles for deletion
446:Thoroughbredwinner
430:Thoroughbredwinner
275:predict the future
478:12 Mighty Orphans
421:
417:
391:
342:Houston Chronicle
317:John Pack Lambert
307:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
599:
416:
414:
407:
405:
403:
401:
385:
380:
374:
372:
370:
302:
227:
226:
212:
164:
152:
134:
72:
34:
607:
606:
602:
601:
600:
598:
597:
596:
595:
589:deletion review
547:Maxwell.obscure
525:YoungPicasso777
508:YoungPicasso777
489:Septuagintus070
422:
410:
408:
396:
394:
392:
383:
378:
365:
363:
300:
169:
160:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
605:
603:
594:
593:
575:
574:
557:
500:
499:
484:A Hard Problem
457:
456:
441:
440:
404:
393:
373:
362:
361:
360:
336:: The subject
327:
309:
308:
291:
290:
289:
268:
267:
230:
229:
166:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
604:
592:
590:
586:
582:
577:
576:
573:
569:
565:
561:
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
513:
509:
504:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
480:
479:
474:
473:
468:
467:
462:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
420:
415:
413:
402:
399:
390:
387:
386:
381:
371:
368:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
306:
303:
297:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
163:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
580:
578:
559:
538:
519:
502:
501:
482:
476:
470:
464:
460:
425:
411:
395:
376:
364:
341:
337:
333:
329:
312:
248:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
157:
111:Gavin Warren
68:
63:Gavin Warren
49:
47:
31:
28:
330:Weak Delete
257:December200
196:free images
466:Back Roads
412:Sandstein
279:Praxidicae
235:Praxidicae
585:talk page
543:WP:NACTOR
472:First Man
384:Hurricane
346:WP:NACTOR
37:talk page
587:or in a
564:Geo Swan
398:Relisted
367:Relisted
334:Draftify
301:MT Train
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
202:WP refs
190:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
481:, and
350:Dflaw4
313:Delete
253:WP:ENT
174:Google
132:delete
217:JSTOR
178:books
162:Stats
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
568:talk
560:Keep
551:talk
539:Keep
529:talk
512:talk
503:Keep
493:talk
461:Keep
450:talk
434:talk
426:Keep
379:Java
354:talk
321:talk
283:talk
261:talk
249:Keep
239:talk
210:FENS
184:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
50:keep
555:UTC
332:or
224:TWL
153:– (
570:)
531:)
514:)
495:)
475:,
469:,
452:)
436:)
356:)
338:is
323:)
298:.
285:)
263:)
241:)
204:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
52:.
566:(
549:(
527:(
510:(
491:(
448:(
432:(
352:(
319:(
281:(
259:(
237:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
158:·
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.