331:- looking over articles, there was some coverage when the company first started, probably because George Zimmer was a TV ad star for many years. The article may have been largely written by Generation Tux judging from the warnings slapped on the article. (Knowledge should not be a corporate stooge). Since then, almost nothing has been written in the press. Sorry, Mr. "I guarantee it" certainly deserves an article but not the barely notable or non-notable Generation Tux.
311:
Disagree. It had GNG for Zimmer's founding but not the company. Most of the news articles are about Zimmer starting a new venture, not about the company. Since the founding, very little coverage. If it is deemed that this company is
Knowledge notable, then Knowledge should become a business directory
249:
with multiple in-depth articles in highly respected, independent publications. This article is not great, has some COI and link spam issues, but that means it might be a candidate for semi-protection, not deletion.
195:
226:
not a
Knowledge notable company, just one of millions of companies. Also somebody else put a tag at the beginning of the article possibly suggesting that the owner of the company may have created the article.
189:
353:
156:
387:
370:
103:
88:
408:
129:
124:
133:
116:
83:
76:
17:
210:
416:
177:
411:
focuses on the business as well as Zimmer himself, with around seven paragraphs on
Generation Tux and tuxedo rentals. The
298:
270:
Doing a Google News search, there are many, many current news stories about
Chevron and Costco. None on Generation Tux.
412:
97:
93:
336:
317:
275:
232:
449:
40:
171:
294:
255:
432:
396:
379:
362:
340:
321:
302:
279:
259:
236:
167:
58:
445:
332:
313:
271:
228:
54:
36:
217:
428:
203:
120:
251:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
183:
424:
391:
374:
357:
112:
64:
420:
246:
150:
419:
articles focus on
Generation Tux. There is easily enough here to pass
312:
as tens of thousands of companies also have brief intro coverage.
293:
Passes GNG with indepth coverage available in reliable sources.
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146:
142:
138:
202:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
452:). No further edits should be made to this page.
386:Note: This discussion has been included in the
369:Note: This discussion has been included in the
352:Note: This discussion has been included in the
354:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
388:list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions
216:
8:
371:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
385:
368:
351:
7:
24:
89:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
469:
433:15:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
341:01:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
322:00:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
280:00:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
245:The topic more than meets
59:12:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
397:07:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
380:07:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
363:07:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
303:05:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
260:00:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
237:00:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
442:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
409:New York Times article
77:Articles for deletion
295:Rickshaw Takahashi
399:
382:
365:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
460:
394:
377:
360:
333:Charliestalnaker
314:Charliestalnaker
272:Charliestalnaker
229:Charliestalnaker
221:
220:
206:
154:
136:
74:
57:
34:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:deletion review
392:
375:
358:
163:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
466:
464:
455:
454:
436:
435:
401:
400:
383:
366:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
306:
305:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
263:
262:
224:
223:
160:
113:Generation Tux
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
65:Generation Tux
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
453:
451:
447:
443:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
402:
398:
395:
389:
384:
381:
378:
372:
367:
364:
361:
355:
350:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
310:
309:
308:
307:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
261:
257:
253:
252:Niftysquirrel
248:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
441:
439:
404:
329:Fails WP:GNG
328:
290:
242:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
70:
49:
47:
31:
28:
190:free images
417:Lifehacker
446:talk page
425:NemesisAT
393:Spiderone
376:Spiderone
359:Spiderone
37:talk page
448:or in a
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
196:WP refs
184:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
421:WP:GNG
413:Mr Mag
407:. The
247:WP:GNG
168:Google
134:delete
423:IMO.
211:JSTOR
172:books
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
429:talk
415:and
405:Keep
337:talk
318:talk
299:talk
291:Keep
276:talk
256:talk
243:Keep
233:talk
204:FENS
178:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
50:keep
218:TWL
155:– (
431:)
390:.
373:.
356:.
339:)
320:)
301:)
278:)
258:)
235:)
198:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
427:(
335:(
316:(
297:(
274:(
254:(
231:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.