Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Gerold Rechle - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

295:
That 22,000 figure is precisely what makes him notable. There are some MPs and representatives with articles on Knowledge (XXG) who were elected to far smaller constituencies. NB - don't bother with my talk page please. Keep commwnts here. I am just popping in and don't want an account.
343:
state or country whose legislature they sit in. So no, population tests don't reify mayors into "inherently" notable politicians just because an MLA's district might have had a smaller population in it than the mayor's city has — the notability test for mayors is the ability to write a
321:
Members of legislatures are notable because they make laws for the place the legislature covers, the size of their district does not matter. Mayors are not default notable, and we do not have the sourcing here to overcome the problem of there not being enough
356:: specific things he did as mayor, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects he had on the city's development, and on and so forth. Just minimally verifying that a mayor existed, the end, is not enough. 204: 339:. What makes members of state or national legislatures notable is not the number of people who happen to live in their district, but the fact that they all have an equal voice in making laws applicable to the 303: 161: 256: 276: 198: 377:. Articles about mayors should be much more than they existed; and the sources should discuss more than routine actions of the official as Bearcat describes. -- 93: 108: 307: 88: 81: 17: 134: 129: 138: 121: 219: 102: 98: 186: 403: 40: 165: 327: 180: 299: 386: 365: 331: 311: 288: 268: 248: 176: 63: 399: 125: 36: 323: 226: 212: 117: 69: 58: 382: 361: 284: 264: 244: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
398:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
236: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
192: 53: 378: 357: 280: 260: 240: 155: 374: 352:
article that explains and contextualizes and deep dives into the mayor's
235:
Bio of a recently deceased mayor of a town of 22,000. Does not pass
394:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151: 147: 143: 211: 225: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 406:). No further edits should be made to this page. 275:Note: This discussion has been included in the 257:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions 255:Note: This discussion has been included in the 8: 277:list of Germany-related deletion discussions 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 297: 274: 254: 304:2A01:4C8:1428:C467:F0B7:ED5:AF2E:FE81 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 94:Introduction to deletion process 1: 366:20:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC) 332:14:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 312:14:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 289:10:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 269:10:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 249:10:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 387:19:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 373:Subject served as mayor of 239:and not otherwise notable. 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 64:11:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 423: 396:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 354:political significance 166:edits since nomination 82:Articles for deletion 324:John Pack Lambert 314: 302:comment added by 291: 271: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 414: 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 422: 421: 417: 416: 415: 413: 412: 411: 410: 404:deletion review 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 420: 418: 409: 408: 390: 389: 368: 334: 293: 292: 272: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 419: 407: 405: 401: 397: 392: 391: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 342: 338: 335: 333: 329: 325: 320: 317: 316: 315: 313: 309: 305: 301: 290: 286: 282: 278: 273: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118:Gerold Rechle 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 70:Gerold Rechle 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 395: 393: 370: 353: 350:well-sourced 349: 345: 340: 336: 318: 298:— Preceding 294: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 346:substantive 199:free images 400:talk page 37:talk page 402:or in a 375:Laupheim 322:sources. 300:unsigned 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 379:Enos733 358:Bearcat 281:Mccapra 261:Mccapra 241:Mccapra 237:WP:NPOL 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 371:Delete 341:entire 337:Delete 319:Delete 177:Google 139:delete 60:plicit 50:delete 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 383:talk 362:talk 348:and 328:talk 308:talk 285:talk 265:talk 245:talk 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 227:TWL 160:– ( 385:) 364:) 330:) 310:) 287:) 279:. 267:) 259:. 247:) 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 52:. 381:( 360:( 326:( 306:( 283:( 263:( 243:( 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
11:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Gerold Rechle

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Gerold Rechle
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.