181:; 16 characters for Arabic pedaogical usage as proposed by Dr. Attash Durrani were indeed accepted at the May 2008 UTC meeting (although they have not yet been accepted by WG2), but the article misrepresents this as a Unicode endorsement of his 'Ghost Characters Theory', which it is not. It also suggests that these characters will be used to create characters productively, which they most certainly should not be.
162:; no significant Google hits and it never shows up in the Unicode mailing lists. I can't really tell if it's meaningful when it's talking about Arabic, but it's basically meaningless when it comes to Unicode.--
126:
93:
88:
97:
80:
17:
215:
238:
219:
190:
171:
153:
62:
36:
84:
237:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
200:
Ghost
Characters Theory is a concept of Font Programming which can be done with the help of Unicode support.
76:
68:
203:
54:
186:
167:
207:
211:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
182:
163:
146:
142:
138:
49:
114:
231:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
137:
hits on Google
Scholar for either it or its creator. Fails
121:
110:
106:
102:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
241:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
133:Non-notable theory. No references given,
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
258:
220:18:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
191:22:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
172:03:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
154:14:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
63:21:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
234:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Ghost Characters Theory
69:Ghost Characters Theory
44:The result was
222:
206:comment added by
249:
236:
201:
150:
124:
118:
100:
60:
56:
52:
34:
257:
256:
252:
251:
250:
248:
247:
246:
245:
239:deletion review
232:
148:
120:
91:
75:
72:
58:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
255:
253:
244:
243:
226:
224:
223:
194:
193:
175:
174:
131:
130:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
254:
242:
240:
235:
229:
228:
227:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
199:
196:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
157:
156:
155:
152:
151:
144:
140:
136:
128:
123:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
233:
230:
225:
197:
178:
159:
147:
134:
132:
45:
43:
31:
28:
202:—Preceding
183:BabelStone
164:Prosfilaes
149:RGTraynor
216:contribs
208:Madzilde
204:unsigned
127:View log
94:protect
89:history
179:Delete
160:Delete
122:delete
98:delete
51:Keeper
46:delete
125:) – (
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
212:talk
198:Keep
187:talk
168:talk
143:WP:N
139:WP:V
135:zero
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
218:)
214:•
189:)
170:)
145:.
141:,
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
59:76
48:.
210:(
185:(
166:(
129:)
119:(
117:)
79:(
55:ǀ
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.