349:
There are 20 sources total in this wikipedia page- you are claiming 3 are fake. You then mention Naluda
Magazine has no contact information when they provide a contact page, contact form, contact address and email. Sources included in the article including Maxim, Next Model Management, Gilda Joelle
206:
367:, Actually, there are only twelve unique sources, including the ones I have already identified as fake, plus the subject's own website and that of her management, both of which are not independent, and then there is
474:, but that didn't have any info on it. So yes, I wrongly assumed that they didn't have one. I'm surprised you found it. I also think it's weird that several other companies all have the same address:
200:
159:
249:(who forgot to fix a copy/paste error from the Daily Beast), are all operated from the same address. naludamagazine.com has no byline and no contact information at all.
467:
323:
304:
266:
285:
106:
91:
444:
Naluda
Magazine 4590 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 670, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Listed on the contact page of their site. Contact page also lists an email.
132:
127:
166:
136:
470:
It's a little odd that that contact page isn't actually linked from the main page. I did do a search and check the source code. I even tried
119:
221:
188:
86:
79:
17:
499:
Discounting the fake sources already listed, there does not seem to be any other sources which would help with notability.
518:
discounting the fake and unreliable sources would leave this with a grand total of 0 sources. I can find nothing better.
100:
96:
182:
577:
548:
527:
510:
489:
461:
422:
405:
380:
359:
334:
315:
296:
277:
258:
61:
594:
40:
178:
505:
123:
228:
544:
115:
67:
590:
457:
449:
401:
355:
36:
453:
445:
397:
364:
351:
565:
523:
411:
396:
which is a 13 question interview with Gilda Joelle Osborn. It is independent and it is an article.
500:
485:
418:
376:
254:
214:
194:
350:
Official
Webpage, Healthy Celeb, Artvoice & Busted Coverage are also not fake news outlets.
573:
540:
393:
327:
308:
289:
270:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
589:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
560:. My partner and I watch all the pageants and modelling vlogs, but you can't take this one
536:
519:
481:
435:
414:
387:
372:
344:
250:
561:
569:
557:
153:
53:
371:
which isn't really an article at all. I'll go though the other ones in a bit.
539:
can’t seem to find any true RS that substantiates any notability claims made.
471:
441:
368:
238:
246:
242:
564:. I would have excused this in 2007 but not now; we are a charity,
410:
It's an interview, not an independent, reliable secondary source.
475:
585:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
440:
Incorrect. Naluda
Magazine Contact information listed here:
394:
https://www.maxim.com/women/what-gilda-joelle-wants-2019-12
149:
145:
141:
213:
478:
477:for example. I think that they're all connected to
392:The Maxim Article cited & sourced is this one:
468:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jessica Markowski
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
597:). No further edits should be made to this page.
322:Note: This discussion has been included in the
303:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
324:list of New York-related deletion discussions
227:
8:
305:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
267:list of Alabama-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
472:https://www.naludamagazine.com/contact-us/
321:
302:
286:list of Women-related deletion discussions
283:
264:
442:https://www.naludamagazine.com/contact/
369:https://www.maxim.com/tag/gilda-joelle
7:
239:http://www.newsdistinct.com/contact/
247:http://www.curiousdesk.com/contact/
243:http://www.coveragelog.com/contact/
556:- another page about a model with
24:
237:Sources are fake. News Distinct
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
452:) 05:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
1:
578:19:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
549:20:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
528:20:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
511:23:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
490:16:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
462:05:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
423:18:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
406:18:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
381:15:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
360:05:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
335:21:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
316:21:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
297:21:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
278:21:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
259:21:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
62:23:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
614:
587:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
562:seriously as notable
566:not a free web-host
116:Gilda Joelle Osborn
68:Gilda Joelle Osborn
466:as I explained at
558:terrible sourcing
337:
318:
299:
280:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
605:
508:
503:
439:
391:
348:
332:
313:
294:
275:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
613:
612:
608:
607:
606:
604:
603:
602:
601:
595:deletion review
506:
501:
433:
385:
342:
328:
309:
290:
271:
245:, Curious Desk
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
611:
609:
600:
599:
581:
580:
551:
530:
513:
494:
493:
492:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
412:See:WP:PRIMARY
339:
338:
319:
300:
281:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
610:
598:
596:
592:
588:
583:
582:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
552:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
533:Strong Delete
531:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
509:
504:
498:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
437:
432:
424:
420:
416:
413:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
389:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
346:
341:
340:
336:
333:
331:
325:
320:
317:
314:
312:
306:
301:
298:
295:
293:
287:
282:
279:
276:
274:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:Coverage Log
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
586:
584:
553:
541:Celestina007
532:
515:
496:
330:CAPTAIN RAJU
329:
311:CAPTAIN RAJU
310:
292:CAPTAIN RAJU
291:
273:CAPTAIN RAJU
272:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
454:Ciaragomez1
446:Ciaragomez1
398:Ciaragomez1
365:Ciaragomez1
352:Ciaragomez1
201:free images
537:Praxidicae
520:Praxidicae
502:TheAwesome
591:talk page
482:Vexations
436:Vexations
415:Vexations
388:Vexations
373:Vexations
345:Vexations
251:Vexations
37:talk page
593:or in a
535:Voicing
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
570:Bearian
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
554:Delete
516:delete
497:Delete
179:Google
137:delete
54:RL0919
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
574:talk
545:talk
524:talk
507:Hwyh
486:talk
458:talk
450:talk
419:talk
402:talk
377:talk
356:talk
255:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
229:TWL
158:– (
576:)
547:)
526:)
488:)
480:.
460:)
421:)
404:)
379:)
358:)
326:.
307:.
288:.
269:.
257:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
572:(
568:.
543:(
522:(
484:(
456:(
448:(
438::
434:@
417:(
400:(
390::
386:@
375:(
354:(
347::
343:@
253:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.