277:(along with citations pointing to sources using which the article can be verified and expanded). If you really are a published author on this subject, and someone who makes a living teaching people about it, you should have no difficulty whatsoever in writing a paragraph that briefly explains what it is. Presumably you've already done that in your book, and presumably as an expert in your field that lectures on it you can briefly describe what that field is in coherent, waffle-free, English.
265:'s talk page have not: Your students — presuming that you are who you claim to be — won't be any more enlightened by this article. It is waffle, from beginning to end, that contains not a scintilla of explanation of what global leadership is. That's why it was nominated for deletion. It isn't even a
328:
Oops, I've just noticed that the Web page's text emanates from someone who "teaches global business courses for several leading international educational institutions such as the
University of Liverpool and Southern New Hampshire University" (must involve a lot of commuting), so I've stricken parts
343:
Mm. I'm not heartened myself about how just about all the Google hits for "E. S. Wibbeke" or "Eileen S. Wibbeke" are either from book flogging sites, blogs, Wiki mirrors or run the exact same self-promotional text. Reed-Elsevier doesn't publish textbooks from outright charlatans, but we're not
329:
of my comment above. Unless
Webofculture establishes rights to the text and releases it under the proper license, it still doesn't belong in the article, though. My "delete" opinion remains unchanged.
132:
273:. If you want to get an encyclopaedia article covering your discipline written, you start with a few sentences that explain, to a general readership,
99:
94:
103:
258:
86:
17:
213:
62:
390:
36:
173:
389:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
375:
352:
338:
319:
294:
247:
whose students "do not believe things now exist unless they see it on
Knowledge (XXG)". Here's a tip for you,
238:
217:
198:
181:
155:
68:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
244:
252:
90:
194:
248:
176:
371:
234:
290:
82:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
190:
56:
302:. The last two paragraphs of the "article" were copy-and-paste from a copyrighted Web page
226:
144:
170:
140:
367:
345:
334:
315:
262:
207:
148:
230:
286:
120:
50:
165:
330:
311:
308:, as I doubt that this article's creator can claim authorship of the text
304:
whose host and author have no connection to the
University of Liverpool
383:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
243:
The creator of this article claims to be a lecturer at the
127:
116:
112:
108:
269:for an encyclopaedia article. It tells the reader
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
393:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:. What's left doesn't even qualify as a dicdef.
261:), that might help where your discussions on
189:- I agree with the Nominator on all points.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
344:their advertising arm, either.
275:what the discipline actually is
1:
376:23:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
353:23:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
339:22:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
320:22:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
295:20:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
239:20:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
218:19:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
199:19:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
182:19:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
156:19:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
69:14:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
285:is what will make a stub.
410:
386:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
245:University of Liverpool
306:, so I've removed them
206:for reasons given.
366:Original research.
281:is what we want.
44:The result was
83:Global leadership
75:Global leadership
67:
401:
388:
349:
210:
152:
130:
124:
106:
65:
59:
53:
49:
34:
409:
408:
404:
403:
402:
400:
399:
398:
397:
391:deletion review
384:
347:
231:X MarX the Spot
216:
208:
180:
150:
126:
97:
81:
78:
63:
57:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
407:
405:
396:
395:
379:
378:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
323:
322:
297:
271:nothing at all
241:
220:
212:
201:
184:
168:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
406:
394:
392:
387:
381:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
354:
351:
350:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
254:
250:
246:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
219:
215:
211:
205:
202:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
183:
178:
175:
172:
167:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
154:
153:
146:
142:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
60:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
385:
382:
363:
346:
307:
303:
299:
282:
278:
274:
270:
255:
249:Webofculture
222:
203:
186:
161:
149:
147:violations.
139:Essay, pure
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
191:Nutiketaiel
348:RGTraynor
267:good start
164:per nom.
151:RGTraynor
368:Edward321
263:RGTraynor
209:WikiDan61
259:contribs
214:ReadMe!!
177:friendly
174:contribs
133:View log
64:contribs
287:Uncle G
100:protect
95:history
364:Delete
300:Delete
227:WP:SYN
223:Delete
204:Delete
187:Delete
162:Delete
145:WP:SYN
128:delete
104:delete
52:seicer
46:delete
166:Ioeth
141:WP:OR
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
372:talk
335:talk
331:Deor
316:talk
312:Deor
291:talk
283:That
279:That
253:talk
235:talk
225:per
195:talk
171:talk
143:and
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
58:talk
374:)
337:)
318:)
293:)
237:)
229:.
197:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
61:|
55:|
48:.
370:(
333:(
314:(
289:(
256:·
251:(
233:(
193:(
179:)
169:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.