Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Gracie Glam (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

587:" test excluded many niche award categories. The Best New Starlet award itself and at least two winners (Rachel Ashley and Holly Hendrix) have been deleted at AfD. As for GNG, please identify the significant coverage by independent reliable sources. The CNBC coverage is not significant and nearly all of the porn trade press is reworked press releases. 653:
does not meet our more logical pornographic biography guidelines. I would argue even these are still way too broad. I tire of having a special set of guidelines for pornographic biographies and still think we should make them pass GNG for indepdent coverage, which virtually all would fail. No one has
460:
Guilherme Burn - yes, some users create a dictatorship against porn articles, it stings in the eye. Knowledge (XXG) need wider discussion about notability for all, about biographies in a general sense because a group of several still the same users created AfD pages for many articles about pornstars
609:(Oscars of porn industry) meets of WP:PORNBIO. Porn-deletionism group constantly trying to push too very very very rigorous version (de facto this group recognize every award as not "well-known and significant"). I do not see the article Holly Hendrix (deleted, for only administrators) but I see 402:
Many articles about pornstars satisfy pornbio, but they can not escape a very characteristic pattern (Summarized Early life and career + Awards + References, usually AVN and XBIZ + External Links usually IAFD and AFD). If we exclude we create a dictatorship against porn since this happens with
375:, significant coverage by reliable, independent secondary sources does not appear to exist. The CNBC reference is a permanently dead link, but CNBC's "Dirty Dozen" is an annual listicle with a two-sentence entry per porn star. It is not significant coverage. The 461:(with awards, many movies, even sometimes mentions in the press, movies, music videos outside porn industry)... and they do nothing with million nothing significant biographies about sportsmens, politics etc. This extremely violates the rule of the 223: 266: 442: 305: 82: 288: 613:
and still the same group of users: K.e.coffman, The Big Bad Wolfowitz aka Hullaballoo, John Pack Lambert, Davey2010 - (for years) this group lobbying for mass removal of porn-articles.
176: 688:
per my comments above. GNG failure without significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. Protests about a deletionist cabal fail to produce evidence to the contrary.
583:
In Knowledge (XXG), consensus can change. In the case of PORNBIO, consensus was changed to tighten the guideline twice since the first AfD debate. Most important, the "
610: 217: 403:
several biographies about sportsmen, youtubers etc ..., if we do not exclude we leave hundreds of articles that hardly stop being an stub. Maybe creating lists like
671:: the "AVN Award for Best New Starlet" is not significant and well known; significant RS coverage not found; sourcing is in passing, PR-driven, and / or primary. -- 325: 549: 254:
I think its time to review if best new starlet is enough as its not worthy of its own article and winning the award clearly doesn't lead to adequate coverage...
77: 183: 348: 108: 123: 513:. The media and the Academy ignore pornography, so wikipedia also ignores it. Per Lack of independent sources. So I strongly support the end of 345: 462: 103: 96: 17: 149: 144: 718: 697: 680: 663: 639: 596: 574: 526: 491: 453: 429: 416: 392: 360: 337: 317: 297: 280: 258: 61: 153: 117: 113: 238: 205: 136: 735: 40: 404: 614: 659: 628: 563: 480: 466: 522: 449: 412: 199: 506: 731: 676: 195: 57: 36: 654:
ever shown that these no name awards they keep speaking of lead to coverage in 3rd-party publications.
140: 655: 618: 553: 500: 470: 541: 514: 510: 372: 518: 445: 408: 292: 245: 231: 333: 313: 132: 67: 693: 592: 388: 356: 92: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
730:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
672: 275: 53: 545: 211: 706: 329: 309: 689: 588: 436: 426: 384: 352: 255: 170: 270: 606: 705:
as cannot find any no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –
443:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/AVN Award for Best New Starlet
407:
and redirecting to this not-so-well-notorian article is a solution.
726:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
617:
describes such an actions. Your arguments have been refuted.
267:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
306:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
289:
list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
517:
and the use of other criteria of notoriety for pornstar.
166: 162: 158: 230: 611:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Holly Hendrix
244: 83:Articles for deletion/Gracie Glam (2nd nomination) 425:That's a great suggestion. I would support that. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 738:). No further edits should be made to this page. 324:Note: This discussion has been included in the 304:Note: This discussion has been included in the 287:Note: This discussion has been included in the 265:Note: This discussion has been included in the 371:. While this performer may meet the letter of 8: 124:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 550:Previous AfD is nearly 100% votes for keep 326:list of Women-related deletion discussions 323: 303: 286: 264: 585:well-known and significant industry award 344:Note: This debate has been added to the 75: 463:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 383:coverage is promotional in nature. 74: 24: 78:Articles for deletion/Gracie Glam 109:Introduction to deletion process 1: 719:19:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 698:19:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC) 615:Knowledge (XXG):Meat puppetry 509:I believe it is a problem of 62:00:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 681:01:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 664:23:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 640:01:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC) 597:23:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 575:16:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 527:19:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 492:18:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 467:Knowledge (XXG):Common sense 454:19:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 430:17:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 417:16:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 393:13:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 361:12:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC) 338:18:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 318:18:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 298:16:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 281:11:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 259:09:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 99:(AfD)? Read these primers! 755: 405:AVN Award for Best Actress 728:Please do not modify it. 605:The Best New Starlet of 32:Please do not modify it. 441:But many do not agree. 346:WikiProject Pornography 73:AfDs for this article: 540:- clear meets of the 97:Articles for deletion 656:John Pack Lambert 636: 571: 488: 349:list of deletions 340: 320: 300: 283: 114:Guide to deletion 104:How to contribute 746: 716: 711: 638: 634: 624: 621: 586: 573: 569: 559: 556: 504: 490: 486: 476: 473: 440: 363: 295: 278: 273: 249: 248: 234: 186: 174: 156: 94: 34: 754: 753: 749: 748: 747: 745: 744: 743: 742: 736:deletion review 712: 707: 631: 626: 622: 619: 584: 566: 561: 557: 554: 501:Subtropical-man 498: 483: 478: 474: 471: 434: 343: 293: 276: 271: 191: 182: 147: 131: 128: 91: 88: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 752: 750: 741: 740: 722: 721: 700: 683: 666: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 629: 600: 599: 578: 577: 564: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 519:Guilherme Burn 495: 494: 481: 457: 456: 446:Guilherme Burn 420: 419: 409:Guilherme Burn 396: 395: 365: 364: 341: 321: 301: 284: 252: 251: 188: 127: 126: 121: 111: 106: 89: 87: 86: 85: 80: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 751: 739: 737: 733: 729: 724: 723: 720: 717: 715: 710: 704: 701: 699: 695: 691: 687: 684: 682: 678: 674: 670: 667: 665: 661: 657: 652: 649: 648: 641: 632: 625: 616: 612: 608: 604: 603: 602: 601: 598: 594: 590: 582: 581: 580: 579: 576: 567: 560: 551: 547: 543: 539: 536: 535: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 507:WP: GOODFAITH 502: 497: 496: 493: 484: 477: 468: 464: 459: 458: 455: 451: 447: 444: 438: 433: 432: 431: 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 418: 414: 410: 406: 401: 398: 397: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 367: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 347: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 296: 290: 285: 282: 279: 274: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 247: 243: 240: 237: 233: 229: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 197: 194: 193:Find sources: 189: 185: 181: 178: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 151: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 129: 125: 122: 119: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 101: 100: 98: 93: 84: 81: 79: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 727: 725: 713: 708: 702: 685: 668: 650: 537: 399: 380: 376: 368: 253: 241: 235: 227: 220: 214: 208: 202: 192: 179: 90: 49: 47: 31: 28: 673:K.e.coffman 620:Subtropical 555:Subtropical 511:WP: BALANCE 472:Subtropical 218:free images 133:Gracie Glam 68:Gracie Glam 54:Ad Orientem 542:WP:PORNBIO 515:WP:PORNBIO 373:WP:PORNBIO 732:talk page 690:• Gene93k 607:AVN Award 589:• Gene93k 544:and also 385:• Gene93k 353:• Gene93k 37:talk page 734:or in a 330:Bakazaka 310:Bakazaka 294:MT Train 177:View log 118:glossary 39:or in a 437:Spartaz 427:Spartaz 400:Comment 369:Comment 256:Spartaz 224:WP refs 212:scholar 150:protect 145:history 95:New to 703:Delete 686:Delete 669:Delete 651:Delete 546:WP:GNG 277:(talk) 272:Ruyaba 196:Google 154:delete 50:delete 709:Davey 239:JSTOR 200:books 184:Stats 171:views 163:watch 159:links 16:< 714:2010 694:talk 677:talk 660:talk 635:en-2 623:-man 593:talk 570:en-2 558:-man 538:Keep 523:talk 505:Per 487:en-2 475:-man 465:and 450:talk 413:talk 389:talk 381:XBiz 379:and 357:talk 334:talk 314:talk 232:FENS 206:news 167:logs 141:talk 137:edit 58:talk 377:AVN 246:TWL 175:– ( 696:) 679:) 662:) 633:| 595:) 568:| 552:. 548:. 525:) 485:| 469:. 452:) 415:) 391:) 359:) 351:. 336:) 328:. 316:) 308:. 291:. 269:. 226:) 169:| 165:| 161:| 157:| 152:| 148:| 143:| 139:| 60:) 52:. 692:( 675:( 658:( 637:) 630:✉ 627:( 591:( 572:) 565:✉ 562:( 521:( 503:: 499:@ 489:) 482:✉ 479:( 448:( 439:: 435:@ 411:( 387:( 355:( 332:( 312:( 250:) 242:· 236:· 228:· 221:· 215:· 209:· 203:· 198:( 190:( 187:) 180:· 173:) 135:( 120:) 116:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ad Orientem
talk
00:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Gracie Glam
Articles for deletion/Gracie Glam
Articles for deletion/Gracie Glam (2nd nomination)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Gracie Glam
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.