295:. I'm willing to accept articles on very obscure mathematical subjects but they need to have some reliably published literature from more than one author or group of authors. I found nothing on this in Google scholar and nothing in Google books, which together should cover a large fraction of the scholarly mathematics research literature and the published popular mathematics literature. This article has been here for 6 1/2 years and in that time has managed only to find two
299:
web pages as sources. This satisfies (barely) the "more than one author" part but not the reliably published part. It is also troubling that the softology link points back to the article here for more (any) information; we should not be doing such circular referencing. And both links just contain
274:
Apparently a published mathematical concepts (that happens to have been implemented in some software). Like math in general, approaches inherent notability (as long as it meets publication and 3rd party discussion requirements, as this one does). The nom seems to be a case of the free-roamong
162:
117:
304:
and should not be covered here. But I'd be willing to change my mind if the week-long AfD period can be more effective than the past years in turning up real references. —
321:
unless notability can be established by third party coverage in reliable secondary sources. At present it isn't, and attempts to find such coverage have so far failed.
156:
243:
212:
In its defense, these visual effects generated by this math are included in one third party (commercial) program that we don't have an article about:
300:
galleries of images with no description of the mathematics behind them, so effectively the entire article here is unsourced. Therefore, it is
122:
282:
275:
anti-software bias that has become prevalent on AfD, but particularly misguided here since it isn't even a software-concept per se.
90:
85:
17:
94:
276:
177:
253:
227:
144:
77:
205:. They appear to be a sort of simulation of an N-body problem, but then I'm engaging in my own original research...
444:
361:
193:
This article describes the mathematics and software for producing certain visual effects, which are described as
36:
443:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
309:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
138:
250:
224:
197:
by the creator of this page, which is also the author of the software. There are a couple of problems here:
340:
323:
425:
134:
429:
412:
394:
373:
352:
327:
313:
287:
258:
232:
59:
213:
81:
272:
After reviewing David
Eppstein's argument, I'm less convinced the (self-)publications quite make it.
369:
348:
336:
305:
184:
170:
410:
73:
65:
390:
201:
The mathematics are not discussed in any independently published venue, which makes that part
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
150:
365:
344:
55:
421:
404:
296:
220:
216:
386:
301:
202:
111:
50:
360:; lacks independent third-party reliable sources to establish notability.
194:
420:
per above, lack of third party reliable resources and notability. --
219:. This looks pretty cool, but I'm not convinced we should invoke
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
208:
As software, I wasn't able to find sources discussing it either.
107:
103:
99:
169:
343:. No reliable sources; no evidence of notability.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
447:). No further edits should be made to this page.
244:list of Software-related deletion discussions
183:
8:
238:
364:also seems to have similar problems. --
242:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
430:17:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
413:04:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
395:00:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
374:16:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
353:09:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
328:21:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
314:21:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
288:20:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
259:19:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
233:19:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
223:based on that factor alone.
60:00:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
362:Fred Mitchell (mathematics)
464:
440:Please do not modify it.
381:per above, or allow for
32:Please do not modify it.
402:per David Eppstein.
409:
44:The result was
403:
302:original research
261:
256:
247:
230:
455:
442:
407:
285:
279:
254:
248:
228:
214:Visions Of Chaos
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
454:
453:
452:
451:
445:deletion review
438:
405:
283:
277:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
461:
459:
450:
449:
433:
432:
415:
397:
376:
355:
337:David Eppstein
330:
316:
306:David Eppstein
297:self-published
290:
262:
210:
209:
206:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
460:
448:
446:
441:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
414:
411:
408:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
320:
317:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
294:
291:
289:
286:
280:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
252:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
231:
226:
222:
218:
215:
207:
204:
200:
199:
198:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
439:
436:
417:
399:
382:
378:
357:
341:Geometry guy
332:
324:Geometry guy
322:
318:
292:
271:
267:
264:
239:
211:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
157:free images
74:Gravity set
66:Gravity set
383:incubation
366:The Anome
345:Gandalf61
422:FaceMash
195:fractals
118:View log
387:Bearian
335:as per
268:Neutral
217:gallery
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
418:Delete
400:Delete
379:Delete
358:Delete
333:Delete
319:Delete
293:Delete
221:WP:IAR
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
278:LotLE
203:WP:OR
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
426:talk
391:talk
370:talk
349:talk
339:and
310:talk
284:talk
265:Keep
255:ping
251:Pcap
240:Note
229:ping
225:Pcap
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
406:Ray
249:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
428:)
393:)
385:.
372:)
351:)
312:)
270:.
246:.
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
424:(
389:(
368:(
347:(
308:(
281:×
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.