Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Green Goo - Knowledge

Source 📝

642:. The reasons provided above miss the point. Getting "coverage" or that "coverage appears sufficient" does not address the criteria for establishing notability. As per WP:NCORP, there must be multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Looking at the references: 720:
and is mostly a copy from their "About Us" page and the same information pack used by the other articles above with a sprinkling from one of the customers "Fresh Eggs Daily" who often promote Green Goo on their facebook page. No Independent Content, fails
209: 557: 543: 687: 744: 790:
Thanks for this highly in-depth breakdown. It gives me some important features to look for in future deletion discussions, and I appreciate you taking the time to lay it all out.
162: 779:
None of the references meet the requirements for establishing notability and I am unable to locate any references that are OK for this purpose. Topic fails NCORP/GNG.
314: 333: 203: 109: 704: 657: 387:
and the local ABC and Fox affiliates are in the article; the first three have significant coverage of the company (I cannot check the Fox one because of
94: 262: 648:
is based on information provided by the company and contains quotes from the company executives. It contains no Independent Content and fails
713: 299: 518: 477: 429: 405: 169: 565: 561: 547: 266: 766: 89: 82: 17: 645: 590: 135: 130: 471:
Thanks for the point about Forbes, you're right. Could you expand on why you don't consider the other sources reliable?
653: 224: 139: 61: 769:
is based on a company announcement and relies entirely on information provided by the cofounder and the company. Fails
575:
Articles are reliable and company got enough coverage. I will suggest to make article better rather than deleting it.
191: 103: 99: 451: 258: 245: 122: 747:
is a paid promotion (Ad) for their "Outdoors Travel Pack". It contains no information on the company at ll. Fails
818: 40: 294: 732:
Once subscribed to GooRu, you will receive $ 100 worth of products for $ 29.97 as our "Thank You" for joining
707:(as I noted above) relies on information provided by the company to a range of different publications, fails 360: 57: 727: 466: 447: 254: 241: 185: 814: 757: 652:. The "story" published on the company can be found in a range of stories in different websites such as 443: 36: 672: 181: 578: 539: 442:
The forbes' article is from contributor, hence can't be used in Knowledge as per community guideline
799: 785: 622: 594: 551: 523: 500: 482: 455: 434: 364: 344: 325: 305: 249: 64: 748: 676: 635: 282: 217: 668: 582: 446:
and beside denver post, local ABC and fox affiliates are also not considered as reliable source
356: 231: 586: 513: 491: 472: 424: 400: 337: 318: 78: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
813:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
770: 761: 752: 739: 722: 708: 699: 680: 661: 649: 639: 631: 795: 618: 420: 396: 197: 126: 780: 610: 509: 495: 416: 392: 691: 156: 410:
20:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC) (Edited 15:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC), see reply below.)
375: 278: 791: 717: 695: 675:. No company details, not significant coverage, no Independent Content, fails 614: 118: 70: 240:
This topic doesn't have mention media mentions in highly reliable source
52:. HighKing's in-depth analysis of sources shows that they do not meet 444:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
382: 604:
Coverage appears sufficient (though mostly local, which is fine).
388: 809:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
698:
and relies entirely on an interview with the founder, failing
512:, Thanks, you make good points. Have changed my !vote. 730:
is paid promotion by the company. It uses phrases like
694:
as it considered a blog post. Even if it wasn't, it is
152: 148: 144: 216: 56:
and therefore do not support a claim of notability. ♠
494:, I've provided reasoning for each reference below. 419:below: the sources don't meet the requirements for 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 821:). No further edits should be made to this page. 332:Note: This discussion has been included in the 313:Note: This discussion has been included in the 315:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 760:is based on an interview with the CEO. Fails 671:but the company gets a mention-in-passing in 334:list of Colorado-related deletion discussions 230: 8: 667:I cannot find mention of the company in the 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 576: 537: 536:Page does have good coverage on the web. 331: 312: 277:If deleted, should it be redirected to 669:referenced article in Global Traveler 7: 636:in-depth information on the company 24: 745:This from St. Louis Post Dispatch 558:2409:4052:2115:C674:0:0:16D6:E0AD 544:2409:4052:2115:C674:0:0:16D6:E0AD 654:this company profile on Range.me 95:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 658:this story on Inventors Digest 1: 281:or elsewhere as a synonym? – 714:This from Home Business Mag 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 838: 800:16:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 786:16:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 705:This from Investors Digest 630:I am unable to locate any 623:18:04, 29 March 2020 (UTC) 595:13:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 552:11:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 524:17:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 501:16:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 483:15:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 456:15:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 435:17:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC) 365:17:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 345:05:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 326:05:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 306:05:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 250:02:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 646:This from The Denver Post 355:Just a pointless article 65:05:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 811:Please do not modify it. 613:'s very good breakdown. 32:Please do not modify it. 736:for your first month. 566:few or no other edits 267:few or no other edits 83:Articles for deletion 767:This from Times-Call 758:This from CBS Denver 632:significant coverage 568:outside this topic. 269:outside this topic. 728:This from Luxe Beat 640:independent content 391:). Seems to meet 597: 581:comment added by 569: 554: 542:comment added by 373:Citations to the 347: 328: 270: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 829: 688:Forbes reference 555: 521: 480: 470: 467:Random 456576798 448:Random 456576798 432: 408: 342: 323: 302: 297: 255:Random 456576798 252: 242:Random 456576798 235: 234: 220: 172: 160: 142: 80: 34: 837: 836: 832: 831: 830: 828: 827: 826: 825: 819:deletion review 638:and containing 519: 478: 464: 430: 406: 338: 319: 300: 295: 177: 168: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 835: 833: 824: 823: 805: 804: 803: 802: 776: 775: 774: 773: 764: 755: 742: 725: 711: 702: 684: 665: 625: 598: 570: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 504: 503: 486: 485: 459: 458: 437: 367: 349: 348: 329: 309: 308: 238: 237: 174: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 834: 822: 820: 816: 812: 807: 806: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788: 787: 784: 783: 778: 777: 772: 768: 765: 763: 759: 756: 754: 750: 746: 743: 741: 737: 735: 729: 726: 724: 719: 715: 712: 710: 706: 703: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 644: 643: 641: 637: 633: 629: 626: 624: 620: 616: 612: 611:User:HighKing 608: 605: 603: 599: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 574: 571: 567: 563: 559: 553: 549: 545: 541: 535: 534: 525: 522: 517: 516: 511: 508: 507: 506: 505: 502: 499: 498: 493: 490: 489: 488: 487: 484: 481: 476: 475: 468: 463: 462: 461: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 438: 436: 433: 428: 427: 422: 418: 414: 411: 409: 404: 403: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 378: 377: 372: 368: 366: 362: 358: 357:Dreamanderson 354: 351: 350: 346: 343: 341: 335: 330: 327: 324: 322: 316: 311: 310: 307: 303: 298: 292: 291: 288: 285: 280: 276: 273: 272: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 251: 247: 243: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179:Find sources: 175: 171: 167: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 810: 808: 781: 749:WP:CORPDEPTH 733: 731: 677:WP:CORPDEPTH 673:this article 627: 606: 601: 600: 577:— Preceding 572: 538:— Preceding 515:YorkshireLad 514: 496: 492:YorkshireLad 474:YorkshireLad 473: 439: 426:YorkshireLad 425: 412: 402:YorkshireLad 401: 381: 380: 374: 370: 369: 352: 340:CAPTAIN RAJU 339: 321:CAPTAIN RAJU 320: 289: 286: 283: 274: 239: 227: 221: 213: 206: 200: 194: 188: 178: 165: 76: 49: 47: 31: 28: 609:, based on 564:) has made 376:Denver Post 279:Green slime 265:) has made 204:free images 718:churnalism 696:churnalism 54:WP:ORGCRIT 815:talk page 771:WP:ORGIND 762:WP:ORGIND 753:WP:ORGIND 740:WP:ORGIND 734:our cause 723:WP:ORGIND 709:WP:ORGIND 700:WP:ORGIND 681:WP:ORGIND 662:WP:ORGIND 650:WP:ORGIND 170:Goo Stats 119:Green Goo 71:Green Goo 37:talk page 817:or in a 782:HighKing 716:is also 660:. Fails 591:contribs 579:unsigned 540:unsigned 510:HighKing 497:HighKing 421:WP:NCORP 417:HighKing 397:WP:NCORP 263:contribs 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 583:Litbeby 440:Comment 399:to me. 284:Laundry 275:Comment 210:WP refs 198:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 738:Fails 690:fails 628:Delete 607:Delete 413:Delete 393:WP:GNG 383:Forbes 353:Delete 182:Google 140:delete 62:(talk) 50:delete 792:Jlevi 692:WP:RS 634:with 615:Jlevi 287:Pizza 225:JSTOR 186:books 157:views 149:watch 145:links 16:< 796:talk 751:and 686:The 679:and 656:and 619:talk 602:Keep 587:talk 573:Keep 562:talk 548:talk 452:talk 415:per 395:and 389:GDPR 371:Keep 361:talk 259:talk 246:talk 218:FENS 192:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 232:TWL 161:– ( 58:PMC 798:) 621:) 593:) 589:• 556:— 550:) 520:✿ 479:✿ 454:) 431:✿ 423:. 407:✿ 379:, 363:) 336:. 317:. 304:) 301:c̄ 290:03 261:• 253:— 248:) 212:) 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 60:♠ 794:( 683:. 664:. 617:( 585:( 560:( 546:( 469:: 465:@ 450:( 359:( 296:d 293:( 257:( 244:( 236:) 228:· 222:· 214:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 184:( 176:( 173:) 166:· 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
WP:ORGCRIT
PMC
(talk)
05:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Green Goo

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Green Goo
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Goo Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.