575:). If a label has had significant impact on the careers of, say, seven notable artists, that is an indication of notability even if ten other artists on their roster never achieved a career trajectory that results in a blue link. I have NOT made up my mind that this is a notable record label, but the number of blue links seem to discount WP:MILL.
378:
keeps coming up at AfD over and over and over. In any case, none of this suggests we should ignore NMUSIC, and certainly, people who are interested in music are, in general, going to be better judges of what musical content to include than people who are interested in corporations and organizations.
377:
That's from eight years ago, and there were several subsequent discussions, some of which I started. At one point we were close to having actual enumerated criteria at NMUSIC, but the conversation got bogged down on a rather trivial technicality, and I abandoned the project - to my chagrin, as this
570:
I'm not sure I follow. There are also numerous bands that have articles. I might have concerns that the articles that exist are part of a walled garden, but just because several artists on a label are not notable (or not created yet) doesn't mean the label is not notable (my example would be
334:, and I have long argued that record labels should be treated the same. WP:MUSIC provides the only language in any notability guideline specifically addressing record labels, and Greyday meets its suggestion of "one of the more important indie labels".
399:, BMG, Warner, Sony Music, etc are not "bands", they're organizations/corporations. Where are you finding any Knowledge guidelines references indicating that recording companies should be evaluated under the same categories as bands?
207:
494:
263:
201:
160:
417:
as "a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose", but we (rightfully) never (ever! in my entire time here) use that yardstick to decide their notability.
283:
246:
for the label, because it's a company/organization rather than a label or a musician and it appears that this label does not satisfy the notability for organizations.
303:
514:
356:
107:
92:
133:
128:
167:
137:
120:
413:
I am not claiming that recording companies are bands. I'm merely pointing out that bands and ensembles unquestionably would fall under
542:
222:
60:
189:
87:
80:
17:
589:
101:
97:
183:
467:
443:
594:
554:
526:
506:
485:
458:
426:
408:
387:
372:
343:
315:
295:
275:
255:
62:
613:
40:
179:
124:
229:
572:
609:
454:
36:
58:
522:
502:
404:
368:
311:
291:
271:
251:
215:
116:
68:
481:
422:
383:
339:
195:
550:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
608:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
585:
360:
327:
53:
538:
518:
498:
414:
400:
364:
331:
307:
287:
267:
247:
239:
477:
418:
394:
379:
335:
243:
326:. Bands and musical ensembles are companies/organizations as well, but we recognize
565:
546:
154:
576:
330:- exclusively - as the criterion for judging their notability over
604:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
470:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
446:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
495:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
150:
146:
142:
214:
476:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
452:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
264:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
616:). No further edits should be made to this page.
513:Note: This discussion has been included in the
493:Note: This discussion has been included in the
302:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
262:Note: This discussion has been included in the
242:would be the appropriate criteria, rather than
284:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
543:Most of the bands on this label are red links
228:
8:
363:still appears to be the relevant criteria.
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
304:list of Oregon-related deletion discussions
515:list of Music-related deletion discussions
512:
492:
301:
281:
261:
7:
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
595:14:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
555:15:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
527:21:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
507:21:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
486:16:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
459:09:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
63:20:03, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
427:14:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
409:23:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
388:14:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
373:21:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
344:14:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
316:19:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
296:19:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
276:19:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
256:19:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
633:
606:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
573:Falcon Records (Texas)
81:Articles for deletion
117:Greyday Productions
69:Greyday Productions
529:
509:
488:
461:
318:
298:
278:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
624:
581:
569:
475:
473:
471:
457:
451:
449:
447:
398:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
632:
631:
627:
626:
625:
623:
622:
621:
620:
614:deletion review
593:
577:
563:
489:
466:
464:
462:
453:
442:
440:
392:
238:I believe that
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
630:
628:
619:
618:
600:
599:
598:
597:
583:
558:
557:
531:
530:
510:
474:
463:
450:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
347:
346:
320:
319:
299:
279:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
629:
617:
615:
611:
607:
602:
601:
596:
591:
587:
582:
580:
574:
567:
562:
561:
560:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
511:
508:
504:
500:
496:
491:
490:
487:
483:
479:
472:
469:
460:
456:
455:North America
448:
445:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
396:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
605:
603:
578:
534:
465:
441:
352:
323:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
590:revolutions
202:free images
55:Ritchie333
610:talk page
519:Graywalls
499:Graywalls
401:Graywalls
365:Graywalls
308:Graywalls
288:Graywalls
268:Graywalls
248:Graywalls
37:talk page
612:or in a
478:Missvain
468:Relisted
444:Relisted
419:Chubbles
395:Chubbles
380:Chubbles
361:WP:NCORP
336:Chubbles
328:WP:MUSIC
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
586:spin me
566:Bearian
547:Bearian
539:WP:MILL
415:WP:CORP
353:comment
332:WP:CORP
240:WP:NORG
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
535:Delete
244:WP:NMG
180:Google
138:delete
579:78.26
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
551:talk
537:per
523:talk
503:talk
482:talk
423:talk
405:talk
384:talk
369:talk
357:here
355:see
340:talk
324:Keep
312:talk
292:talk
272:talk
252:talk
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
230:TWL
159:– (
588:/
553:)
545:.
541:.
525:)
517:.
505:)
497:.
484:)
425:)
407:)
386:)
371:)
359:.
342:)
314:)
306:.
294:)
286:.
274:)
266:.
254:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
52:.
592:)
584:(
568::
564:@
549:(
521:(
501:(
480:(
421:(
403:(
397::
393:@
382:(
367:(
338:(
310:(
290:(
270:(
250:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.