Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Guy Phoenix - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

240:
property developer whose RS is from asking £10m for a house in Nottingham (despite some of the RS, £10m is a long way from the UK's most expensive house); and even that RS is mostly press releases from Phoenix (he added a charging station for an electric flying car). Zero SIGCOV (or really any COV on
359:. My initial thoughts were the article should be deleted, as it has a promotional tone and lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. However, outside of the news of the £10m home, Guy Phoenix has had some news coverage for his property developing business, albeit mainly in local 384:
His "awards" are non-notable trade awards (e.g. in return for a fee you can "earn" your award) – they do not get covered in any proper UK RS (unlike the notable UK property awards). Also noting that the author,
206: 336: 316: 408:: Thank you for that information. When I voted "Weak Keep" I wasn't aware that the author had been blocked for spamming. I would have no objections to this article being deleted. 159: 296: 200: 91: 363:
newspapers. There are sources that Guy Phoenix has won some UK architecture awards. It's a marginal decision for me, but possibly newsworthy enough to keep.
106: 166: 86: 79: 17: 132: 127: 136: 100: 96: 221: 188: 119: 544: 40: 457: 413: 368: 396: 344: 324: 304: 284: 182: 515: 431:. The coverage found are merely passing mentions and of the subject, not enough for a page now. A case of 540: 178: 36: 527: 494: 473: 461: 444: 417: 400: 372: 348: 328: 308: 288: 61: 123: 453: 409: 364: 432: 392: 340: 320: 300: 280: 228: 214: 115: 67: 57: 272: 523: 440: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
539:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
507: 503: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
511: 482: 276: 490: 360: 267: 255: 249: 194: 53: 519: 436: 243: 153: 486: 470: 237: 261: 535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
387: 241:
him, outside of his £10m house) in the main UK papers (e.g.
510:. I remind the reader that if this were 2008, we could 149: 145: 141: 213: 481:
not enough in-depth coverage to prove Phoenix passes
469:- confirmed paid-for spam written by a sockpuppet. 452:
passing mentions are not enough to show notability.
337:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
317:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
227: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 547:). No further edits should be made to this page. 335:Note: This discussion has been included in the 315:Note: This discussion has been included in the 295:Note: This discussion has been included in the 279:behind this). I ask the community to decide, 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 297:list of People-related deletion discussions 334: 314: 294: 52:. Being bold and deleting this one early. 514:, but in face of clear evidence in 2020, 391:, has been blocked for spamming. thanks. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 516:this is just abuse of a charity 1: 508:local real estate salesperson 528:21:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 495:00:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 474:02:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC) 462:19:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 445:10:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 418:05:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC) 401:09:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 373:03:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 62:18:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC) 349:20:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 329:20:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 309:20:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 289:20:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 564: 275:feel (and I suspect some 537:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 80:Articles for deletion 271:). Article has a 512:assume good faith 454:John Pack Lambert 351: 331: 311: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 555: 390: 232: 231: 217: 169: 157: 139: 77: 34: 563: 562: 558: 557: 556: 554: 553: 552: 551: 545:deletion review 410:Kind Tennis Fan 386: 365:Kind Tennis Fan 361:Nottinghamshire 268:The Independant 256:Financial Times 250:Daily Telegraph 174: 165: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 561: 559: 550: 549: 531: 530: 497: 476: 464: 447: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 393:Britishfinance 376: 375: 353: 352: 341:Britishfinance 332: 321:Britishfinance 312: 301:Britishfinance 281:Britishfinance 235: 234: 171: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 560: 548: 546: 542: 538: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 498: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 477: 475: 472: 468: 465: 463: 459: 455: 451: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 427: 426: 419: 415: 411: 407: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 389: 383: 380: 379: 378: 377: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 355: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 330: 326: 322: 318: 313: 310: 306: 302: 298: 293: 292: 291: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 264: 263: 258: 257: 252: 251: 246: 245: 239: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 168: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 536: 534: 499: 478: 466: 449: 428: 405: 381: 356: 266: 260: 254: 248: 244:The Guardian 242: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 162: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 201:free images 116:Guy Phoenix 68:Guy Phoenix 433:WP:TOOSOON 238:Nottingham 541:talk page 357:Weak Keep 262:The Times 37:talk page 543:or in a 485:. Best, 388:Silkeop3 273:WP:PROMO 160:View log 101:glossary 54:Missvain 39:or in a 520:Bearian 437:Lapablo 406:Comment 382:Comment 207:WP refs 195:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 506:for a 500:Delete 483:WP:GNG 479:Delete 467:Delete 450:Delete 429:Delete 277:WP:UPE 179:Google 137:delete 50:delete 487:GPL93 471:MER-C 265:, or 222:JSTOR 183:books 167:Stats 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 524:talk 504:spam 491:talk 458:talk 441:talk 414:talk 397:talk 369:talk 345:talk 325:talk 305:talk 285:talk 215:FENS 189:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 229:TWL 158:– ( 526:) 518:. 502:- 493:) 460:) 443:) 435:. 416:) 399:) 371:) 347:) 339:. 327:) 319:. 307:) 299:. 287:) 259:, 253:, 247:, 209:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 522:( 489:( 456:( 439:( 412:( 395:( 367:( 343:( 323:( 303:( 283:( 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 163:· 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Missvain
talk
18:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Guy Phoenix

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Guy Phoenix
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.