Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Gwarn Music - Knowledge

Source 📝

341:. The nominator is correct... this label is about as non-notable as it gets. Basically a vanity label set up by Tony Henry to release music by his new band, and it appears the label only released two singles by the band, both of which disappeared without trace, before Gwarn was absorbed into another label. The editor who created this article appears to have been an IP and SPA who only edited articles related to Tony Henry, which makes me think it may well have been Mr. Henry himself. 198: 375:
per nom and Richard3120. When even the discogs page is bare, which contains almost everything on bands/labels (even though it is unreliable), you know you are "super unnotable".
246: 159: 266: 358:. Of highly marginal interest, from a time when such articles were being created with virtually no oversight. (I created some myself, so I know of which I speak.) 192: 300: 283: 106: 91: 241:. NCORP is a high bar, to be fair, but for good reason. This has no hits at all on Google News, Google Books or ProQuest. Even the 320:. I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources that would show this record label meets the notability standard. 132: 127: 86: 79: 17: 136: 213: 180: 119: 380: 325: 100: 96: 422: 40: 174: 401: 376: 363: 321: 418: 346: 170: 36: 405: 384: 367: 350: 329: 309: 292: 275: 258: 61: 123: 220: 206: 397: 115: 67: 359: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
417:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
342: 230: 57: 338: 234: 186: 304: 287: 270: 253: 393: 252:
This surely, surely does not meet 2021 Knowledge notability standards for a company.
238: 242: 249:. I think this is actually the first time I've searched something and had no hits! 153: 53: 413:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
233:
search is not turning up the sort of coverage required to pass
229:
This is long, long overdue. Unsourced for 16 years and my
149: 145: 141: 205: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 425:). No further edits should be made to this page. 299:Note: This discussion has been included in the 282:Note: This discussion has been included in the 265:Note: This discussion has been included in the 267:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 245:is bare. There is also nothing coming up in a 219: 8: 301:list of England-related deletion discussions 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 298: 284:list of Music-related deletion discussions 281: 264: 7: 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 62:20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 406:22:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC) 385:19:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 368:15:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 351:04:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 330:09:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC) 310:20:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC) 293:20:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC) 276:20:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC) 259:20:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 442: 415:Please do not modify it. 247:British newspaper search 32:Please do not modify it. 80:Articles for deletion 377:GhostDestroyer100 322:Dylanfromthenorth 312: 295: 278: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 433: 307: 290: 273: 256: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 441: 440: 436: 435: 434: 432: 431: 430: 429: 423:deletion review 305: 288: 271: 254: 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 439: 437: 428: 427: 409: 408: 392:does not meet 387: 370: 353: 332: 314: 313: 296: 279: 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 438: 426: 424: 420: 416: 411: 410: 407: 403: 399: 398:Expertwikiguy 395: 391: 388: 386: 382: 378: 374: 371: 369: 365: 361: 357: 354: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 316: 315: 311: 308: 302: 297: 294: 291: 285: 280: 277: 274: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 250: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 414: 412: 389: 372: 360:RobinCarmody 355: 334: 317: 251: 243:Discogs page 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 343:Richard3120 193:free images 116:Gwarn Music 68:Gwarn Music 419:talk page 306:Spiderone 289:Spiderone 272:Spiderone 255:Spiderone 231:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 421:or in a 339:WP:NCORP 337:: fails 235:WP:NCORP 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 394:WP:GNG 390:Delete 373:Delete 356:Delete 335:Delete 318:Delete 239:WP:GNG 171:Google 137:delete 54:Daniel 50:delete 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 402:talk 381:talk 364:talk 347:talk 326:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 237:or 221:TWL 158:– ( 404:) 383:) 366:) 349:) 328:) 303:. 286:. 269:. 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 400:( 396:. 379:( 362:( 345:( 324:( 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Daniel
talk
20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Gwarn Music

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Gwarn Music
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.