520:
removed because they were unreliable, redundant, and did not provide any content relevant to the article. references are for verifying information found in the article and to provide the reader with a place to explore further information on the topic. The more than a dozen webpages cited after the name of one album did not aid in this effort in the slightest. But then, anyone can look at the edit history and see this very clearly for themselves. I was notified of this discussion on my talk page because I was one of very few people that has been involved with this article. That is standard procedure. As for "user-submitted" content, I will point out that content on a website which is submitted by users as opposed to credentialed editorial staff, is typically not considered a reliable source of information. Please see
632:. Granted, I would say this article needs to be written far better, and certainly it would not hurt to cite more reliable independent sources, but for those simply tagging what needs to be fixed at the top of the page will suffice. As for the playlists that were deleted during changes to this page during the time period of this AfD (I'm including the first arguments at the top of this page as the beginning of the debate) I do believe them to be credible, but since they appear to be from the same source, finding that source and simply citing that instead seems much wiser than citing all of them.
270:
order to make up for the subject's general lack of notability. The article does not actually establish notability. I will note that it has been deleted before for this exact same reason. It is common for small-time uknown garage bands to create a wikipedia page for themselves in order to promote the band and give themselves a certain notoriety. This is just such an attempt at promotion, only with more meaningless references. Regardless of motives which cannot themselves constitute a viable reason for deletion, the article does not pass
382:
and many often have music supplied from the same source, saying they are the same is like saying all reviews are the same since at some point down the line they likely obtained the music from the same source, since the artist is at some point the source of their own music, and their label distributes it. Taking into account the tone of some of the editors that favor the article's deletion, I would question wether this deletion discussion was created
499:
contribution to this article was an attempt at speedy deletion of this afd, and one editor involved has since deleted many sources, please do check the list of changes to see which sources were deleted during the course of this afd, and gauge their reliability for yourself. Certain statements are also misleading "is not a book, film or musical recording" in
231:(21 Aug 11) with only superficial changes. Only real change has been to add a long laundry list of so called playlists. Despite the url suggesting otherwise they are not playlists. they are also not independent coverage. They are just an indication someone is trying to use the internet for promotion, as someone here is trying to do with wikipedia but
827:. This page isn't about a band; it's about a living person, and the threshold for BLPs should normally be higher than album discussion and track listings on Billboard and Allmusic. Each source fails WP:IRS either because it's a blog or because it fails to directly detail the artist. No sources which meet the standard for sourcing on a BLP. No
475:, not a "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". 10 and 11 are primary sources, they are "publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves", one of the things are not considered "reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself" according to
239:. He still lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the other multitude of references they are either trivial coverage (like the allmusic listing), are primary sources or press releases, are not significant coverage or are not reliable sources. See previous afd for more on sources. Nothing satisfying
747:
RE: IODA - regardless of what portion of IODA is owned by SONY music, its missing the point to claim that using IODA to distribute your music on the internet makes it a "major-label release". IODA is not, in fact a proper record label in the way that SONY Music of Cash Money records is, they are more
404:
re not inherited, Beverte is not a book, film or musical recording. re playlists, play lists have what was played listed, not the case here. re coi, what outside interest do you think I am advancing? More importantly on good faith and coi, this afd is about wether
Beverte should have an article, it's
904:
Thanks for your work on the page, but I'm not swayed. IMDB isn't usually a RS for BLPs and this one says sourced from "Official
Representative" so it fails independence even if. Two of the sources you list are clearly blogs and the nin.com source is merely the artist's work. If this were a band, I'd
519:
I did indeed remove several references from the article which I explained in full in the edit comments. If you wish to challenge those edits you should do so on that articles talk page an not use my edits as a way to imply some malicious intent or a violation of common procedure. The references were
269:
there are a lot of sites which allow user submitted content and these can be used on wikipedia to stack a bunch of superficial references to add legitimacy to the topic. The same thing has certainly been done here. It is a clue when you see 15 references in the same place that someone is stacking in
381:
does state an exception for books, films, and music. The different playlists are on the sites of separate radio stations, and I see no way the urls indicate that they aren't playlists, although it does look like they are from the same supplier, but many radio stations are owned by the same company,
652:
That IODA is partly owned by SONY does not make any
Beverte recording a major-label release. The issue is not improving the sources，because those other sources do not appear to exist. In the future the subject may become notable and receive in-depth coverage by notable, independent, third-party
498:
Deleting editor please note that in this debate editors asking for this article's deletion are using acceptance of submission of music itself and news tips as justification for calling a source "user-submitted." One editor involved in this debate also did notify another editor whose first
427:
and therefore not reliable, though reliablity isn't much of an issue since the pages referenced don't have any content to speak of. I can submit my "band" via the same form and my band name will show up on dozens of identical websites with different radio call letters at the top. -
444:
for
Dufbeerforme and Gene93K: Sources 8,9, 10, and 11 were not present on the article when it was deleted. My understanding is that some online metal magazines qualify as reliable sources, while others do not. Are you saying that none of these qualify as
336:. I would also encourage the closing editor to look at the sources cited for themselves, and to please look at the tone, insertion of opinions, and any statements of insulting nature the other editors are relying on. -
196:
103:
627:
The subject is covered in plenty of reliable, third party sources, including being reviewed which is indisputably a third party opinion and the IODA, which is a distribution outlet for many indie labels
831:
profiles. (on edit, The
Gauntlet does produce a brief interview, and based on its own page information does appear to be more than a blog but less than a RS as described by policy and guideline).
792:
303:
748:
like
Jamendo, they have a website that allows unsigned artists and anyone with a digital audio recorder to distribute their music online. Even if it were Sony music themselves signing Beverte,
692:
states that for those outside "mass-media traditions" "is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable subculture." He is covered frequently in publications devoted to the
332:
rather than simply taking other editors' word for it. And as for the unimportant label comment, I would like the closing editor to research the definition of a major label, then see
377:
press releases, but they are not the majority by any means, and I see no bias at all that would indicate that this article in created for promotion. I would also like to point out
157:
52:. The consensus is that the sources do not meet the independent/reliable criteria expected of sources. There is also a consensus that insufficient evidedence exists to show that
423:
The references which are represented in the article as radio playlists, they are not playlists, not only fail to establish any notability whatsoever, but they are yet more
190:
567:
Having gone over the sources, which ones are anyone claiming are (a) reliable, (b) independent, (c) non-user-submitted and (d) discuss the subject in significant detail?
468:
228:
98:
544:"Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles."
449:? Or that they aren't independent? Or that they don't discuss the subject in detail? Because if any of those are reliable, they seem to be enough to meet
704:
is not only "partially" owned by Sony, it is fully owned by Sony, I refer you to the multiple sources cited on both the IODA Knowledge (XXG) page, and the
279:
235:. Album not on important label. Calling nine inch nails an associated act is laughable attempt to assert importance and doesn't help as notability is
350:
Even if we pretend IODA is a major label and is the label that released
Beverte's album it is still only one album, less than the two asked for by
752:
requires two (2) major-label releases to establish notability in this fashion. Also HeavyHardMetalMania is definitely not a reliable source, see
328:
The article has added quite a few new sources since deletion. I encourage the person making the final decision to keep or delete to review the
853:, I would like to mention that a multitude of sources were deleted in bad faith during the course of this AfD, including, but not limited to:
633:
609:
391:
537:
RE: exceptions to "Notability is not inherited." BusyWikipedian, You are misreading the guidelines. The exception referred to above is in
871:
130:
125:
76:
17:
918:
905:
be slightly more inclined toward a keep outcome, but as a BLP, we have a strong need to protect both the pedia and the subject with
899:
840:
804:
783:
760:
742:
728:
681:
665:
641:
615:
575:
553:
532:
512:
488:
462:
432:
418:
399:
363:
345:
317:
294:
252:
82:
653:
sources. At that time maybe we can consider the subject notable enough for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG). again, a brief reading of
134:
211:
117:
178:
909:. I can't find a single source which meets IRS fully, with the possible exception of the interview linked on The Gauntlet.
939:
40:
733:
Heavy Metal is in the "mass-media traditions". The album was not released by IODA. What
Dethcentrik song is notable?
232:
858:
697:
549:
The subject of this article unquestionably does not meet that criteria. Otherwise, notability is not inherited. -
172:
524:
and look at the sources for yourselves. There should be no question that the sources I have removed do not pass
500:
378:
236:
895:
779:
724:
637:
604:
508:
395:
341:
661:
would answer any questions about whether or not the subject may be considered notable with a definitive no. -
287:
283:
883:
708:
Knowledge (XXG) page, rather than list all the sources in this AfD. And seeing as he is the main composer of
168:
800:
738:
677:
484:
414:
359:
248:
70:
716:
935:
218:
36:
387:
121:
891:
775:
757:
720:
662:
599:
596:
550:
529:
504:
429:
337:
291:
204:
816:
585:
890:
of them as we speak, and will be editing the article with additional sources as well most likely.
796:
734:
709:
673:
480:
458:
410:
355:
264:
244:
113:
88:
753:
538:
476:
383:
351:
240:
914:
868:
836:
693:
313:
184:
59:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
934:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
749:
689:
654:
406:
275:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
712:
906:
824:
820:
521:
450:
333:
271:
568:
658:
525:
446:
471:, it was ref number 10 in the stable version linked to. 9 is not a reliable source, see
672:
And which do you think are reliable sources that provide in-depth coverage of
Beverte?
454:
910:
850:
832:
424:
309:
151:
859:
http://www.heavyhardmetalmania.net/2011/11/dd-beverte-uncensored-interview.html
772:
This debate has been open for 18 days, and was already closed once 10 days ago.
629:
705:
267:
due to one editor not looking closely at the sources referenced. In particular
588:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
263:
I was very disappointed to see that there was no consensus for deletion of
854:
884:
http://darkdoomgrinddeath.blogspot.com/2011/10/dethcentrik-interview.html
879:
472:
928:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
701:
503:
I do not see the word "recording" anywhere, simply music.
467:
Number 8 was directly addressed by Metal lunchbox in the
793:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
304:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
773:
329:
147:
143:
139:
696:
subculture. I myself would qualify his interview with
386:, and whether those same editors should be considered
203:
595:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
217:
104:Articles for deletion/Død Beverte (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
942:). No further edits should be made to this page.
373:This article cites reviews, interviews, and yes
791:Note: This debate has been re-included in the
479:. both are also a blogs, not reliable sources.
280:Knowledge (XXG):Masking the lack of notability
8:
849:As to whether this changes your vote or not
302:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Knowledge (XXG) is not a means of promotion
790:
715:, I would say he fits the requirement for
301:
96:
880:http://remix.nin.com/play/mix?id=24150
855:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4802015/bio
719:in addition to individual notability.
688:I would like to simply point out that
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
95:
24:
227:Recreation of article deleted at
99:Articles for deletion/Død Beverte
867:. Germany: Brev Publications.
1:
330:actual changes since deletion
919:18:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
900:17:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
841:15:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
805:08:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
784:23:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
761:16:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
743:07:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
729:03:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
682:07:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
666:07:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
642:17:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
616:10:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
576:10:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
554:02:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
533:02:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
513:09:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
489:07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
463:05:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
433:02:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
419:07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
400:22:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
364:07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
346:18:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
318:15:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
295:08:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
253:07:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
83:21:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
288:Knowledge (XXG):Bombardment
284:Knowledge (XXG):Wikipuffery
959:
863:Adriaan, Germain (2011).
795:after being dropped off.
931:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
630:is owned by Sony Music
541:and reads as follows:
425:user-submitted content
94:AfDs for this article:
886:, and I am restoring
388:conflicts of interest
698:HeavyHardMetalMania
405:not about me, read
278:. Not notable. see
48:The result was
807:
700:as reliable. The
618:
320:
307:
950:
933:
877:
612:
607:
602:
594:
590:
572:
308:
222:
221:
207:
155:
137:
79:
73:
65:
62:
34:
958:
957:
953:
952:
951:
949:
948:
947:
946:
940:deletion review
929:
874:
862:
610:
605:
600:
583:
570:
501:WP:NOTINHERITED
379:WP:NOTINHERITED
286:and especially
164:
128:
112:
109:
92:
77:
71:
63:
60:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
956:
954:
945:
944:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
892:BusyWikipedian
873:978-6137074466
872:
844:
843:
829:interviews, no
809:
808:
787:
786:
776:BusyWikipedian
766:
765:
764:
763:
758:Metal lunchbox
745:
721:BusyWikipedian
686:
685:
684:
670:
669:
668:
663:Metal lunchbox
645:
644:
634:164.47.161.254
621:
620:
619:
592:
591:
580:
579:
578:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
551:Metal lunchbox
547:
546:
545:
535:
530:Metal lunchbox
505:BusyWikipedian
493:
492:
491:
473:their about us
438:
437:
436:
435:
430:Metal lunchbox
421:
392:97.112.152.209
368:
367:
366:
338:BusyWikipedian
322:
321:
298:
297:
292:Metal lunchbox
225:
224:
161:
108:
107:
106:
101:
93:
91:
86:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
955:
943:
941:
937:
932:
926:
920:
916:
912:
908:
903:
902:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
875:
870:
866:
860:
856:
852:
848:
847:
846:
845:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
811:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:duffbeerforme
794:
789:
788:
785:
781:
777:
774:
771:
768:
767:
762:
759:
755:
751:
746:
744:
740:
736:
735:duffbeerforme
732:
731:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:duffbeerforme
671:
667:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
639:
635:
631:
626:
623:
622:
617:
613:
608:
603:
598:
593:
589:
587:
582:
581:
577:
574:
573:
566:
563:
562:
555:
552:
548:
543:
542:
540:
536:
534:
531:
527:
523:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:duffbeerforme
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
443:
440:
439:
434:
431:
426:
422:
420:
416:
412:
411:duffbeerforme
408:
403:
402:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:in good faith
380:
376:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:duffbeerforme
353:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
305:
300:
299:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
268:
266:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
245:duffbeerforme
242:
238:
237:not inherited
234:
230:
220:
216:
213:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
170:
167:
166:Find sources:
162:
159:
153:
149:
145:
141:
136:
132:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
105:
102:
100:
97:
90:
87:
85:
84:
80:
74:
68:
67:
66:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
930:
927:
887:
864:
828:
812:
769:
624:
584:
569:
564:
495:
441:
374:
370:
325:
262:
258:
226:
214:
208:
200:
193:
187:
181:
175:
165:
58:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
865:Død Beverte
710:Dethcentrik
694:heavy metal
571:Ravenswing
265:Dethcentrik
191:free images
114:Død Beverte
89:Død Beverte
706:Sony Music
936:talk page
817:WP:NMUSIC
717:composers
469:first afd
310:• Gene93k
37:talk page
938:or in a
815:failing
754:WP:BLOGS
586:Relisted
539:WP:MUSIC
477:wp:music
455:Qwyrxian
442:Question
352:wp:music
241:wp:music
158:View log
78:contribs
56:is met.
39:or in a
911:BusterD
851:BusterD
833:BusterD
750:WP:BAND
690:WP:BAND
655:WP:BAND
597:King of
565:Delete:
496:Comment
407:WP:ATTP
276:WP:BAND
197:WP refs
185:scholar
131:protect
126:history
61:Phantom
54:WP:BAND
907:WP:IRS
825:WP:GNG
821:WP:BLP
813:Delete
522:WP:SPS
451:WP:GNG
272:WP:GNG
259:Delete
169:Google
135:delete
50:delete
770:Note:
659:WP:RS
526:WP:RS
447:WP:RS
212:JSTOR
173:books
152:views
144:watch
140:links
64:Steve
16:<
915:talk
896:talk
888:some
869:ISBN
837:talk
823:and
801:talk
780:talk
756:. -
739:talk
725:talk
713:link
702:IODA
678:talk
657:and
638:talk
625:Keep
528:. -
509:talk
485:talk
459:talk
415:talk
396:talk
375:some
371:Keep
360:talk
342:talk
334:this
326:Keep
314:talk
290:. -
249:talk
205:FENS
179:news
148:logs
122:talk
118:edit
72:talk
453:.
274:or
229:afd
219:TWL
156:– (
917:)
898:)
882:,
878:,
861:,
857:,
839:)
819:,
803:)
782:)
741:)
727:)
680:)
640:)
614:♠
511:)
487:)
461:)
417:)
409:.
398:)
362:)
354:.
344:)
316:)
306:.
282:,
261:-
251:)
243:.
199:)
150:|
146:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
81:\
913:(
894:(
876:.
835:(
799:(
778:(
737:(
723:(
676:(
636:(
611:♣
606:♦
601:♥
507:(
483:(
457:(
413:(
394:(
390:-
358:(
340:(
312:(
247:(
223:)
215:·
209:·
201:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
171:(
163:(
160:)
154:)
116:(
75:|
69:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.