Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/DMARGE - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

607:"It's still a drop in the ocean in comparison to women but our numbers around fashion are very high for blokes," D'Marge founder and editor Luc Wiesman told the Financial Review. "If media planners think beyond the basic reach model and look at how native content can be used in conjunction with traditional media, they may be pleasantly surprised." 623:
Luc Wiesman founder of men’s website D’Marge was rumoured to be “taking on GQ” and Editor-in-Chief Lisa Messenger loved the idea of another upcoming independent media platform wanting to take on the bigger publishing houses “when we met with Luc, we knew he was the perfect fit, he encompasses a lot
604:
Equally, men's fashion and lifestyle blog, D'Marge has done for blokes what no mainstream magazine title has been able to achieve ever – 700,000 men visit the Australian site to get tips on looking cool and the accessories, holidays, cars, and experiences to go with
204: 826:. None of the sources are non-trivial, and the rest are routine coverage of normal events (as I have shown in my source analysis above). WEBCRIT also states that the magazine could be notable if it 807:-- this magazine barely has enough sources that care to mention it, and insignificantly so. It doesn't pass the second criterion either, which states that it could be notable if it 828:"has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization. Ideally, this award itself is also notable and already has a Knowledge (XXG) article." 266: 249: 161: 757:
mentions that DMARGE was awarded the "Publishing Company of the Year – Small and Branded Content Studio of the Year" but contains no information on the company itself.
467:, non-SIGCOV sources already included in the article. Could you please provide a non-trivial source? I'll !vote to keep if I see a source that passes this criterion. 198: 93: 618:
is about "The Collective" magazine's coverage of "local Aussie talent", and contains a single paragraph on DMARGE which lacks SIGCOV and consists of quotes:
754: 743: 669:"The rebrand represents DMARGE’s unique and honest approach to a range of men’s interests; it’s a bold logo that works across all mediums and applications" 108: 592: 646: 679: 800: 323:
the references establishing that fact are reliable. Therefore notable on the basis of this being a well-syndicated Australian publication.
660: 639: 732: 690: 585: 88: 81: 17: 711: 632: 682:
that describes the magazine's launch of a "Chinese Australian Platform to Help Luxury Brands Bridge Tourism Gap", and lacks any
615: 704: 102: 98: 533: 395: 849: 775: 514: 482: 874: 371: 40: 721:
is a list of articles published by James Booth, who apparently works at DMARGE; no source here that focuses on DMARGE.
697: 165: 219: 186: 134: 129: 750:", one of multiple winners of Mumbrella's "Best Launch/Relaunch of the Year – Small Publisher." This lacks SIGCOV. 308: 138: 736: 596: 121: 683: 870: 180: 36: 653: 439: 375: 346: 253: 236: 819: 789: 664: 460: 428: 212: 176: 805:"The periodical has made significant impact in its field or other area, such as higher education" 673:"DMARGE’s print magazine, Shut Up & Take My Money will launch its fourth edition in November" 567: 410: 361: 328: 125: 853: 779: 571: 550: 518: 486: 443: 415: 380: 365: 351: 332: 277: 258: 241: 63: 544: 270: 226: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
869:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
796: 785: 493:
SIGCOV creates a presumption that a subject meets GNG, it is not itself a requirement for GNG
432: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
843: 831: 769: 508: 476: 117: 69: 728:
also contains a few article published by DMARGE, but nothing that focuses on DMARGE itself.
342: 450: 435: 595:
article contains very trivial coverage of DMARGE, meaning it lacks SIGCOV. It's also not
735:
is 100% routine coverage of the magazine that consists mostly of quotes, making it non-
563: 405: 357: 338: 324: 372:
Wikipedia_talk:Notability#RfC_on_wording_of_GNG_guidelines,_and_SIGCOV_in_particular
192: 588:
lacks any focus on DMARGE, instead focusing on a study conducted by that magazine.
491:
I will note that this article's sourcing is in terrible condition. Comments like "
459:" about the subject for notability to be determined. I.e., sources other than the 155: 835: 761: 500: 468: 718: 642:
focuses on DMARGE's founder Luc Wiesman and very minimally covers the magazine.
812: 733:
Dmarge partners with Executive Traveller & The Roar to target Aussie men
562:
or Draftify. There is a huge issue with the reliable sources requirements.
725: 54: 809:"received a notable award or honor at a national or international level" 318: 302: 586:
Dmarge study shows what brands need to know about men’s mental health
345:
does require SIGCOV. Which policy makes you think that it doesn't?
356:
the way that it’s worded. I’ve opened an RfC regarding this issue
865:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
707:
doesn't cover DMARGE, but was "first published on d'marge.com".
536:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
398:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
822:. According to WEBCRIT, the magazine needs to have been the 649:
source focuses on DMARGE's founder and not on the magazine.
497:
meets our guidelines for inclusion WP:WEBCRIT and WP:NMAG
654:
This source contains the Mumbrella Publish Award winners
151: 147: 143: 465:
common, everyday, ordinary items that do not stand out
211: 803:. It doesn't pass the first criterion, which states 698:
Dmarge launches e-commerce platform The Dmarge Shop
542:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 404:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 225: 455:According to WEBCRIT, there needs to be at least " 824:"subject of multiple non-trivial published works" 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 877:). No further edits should be made to this page. 265:Note: This discussion has been included in the 248:Note: This discussion has been included in the 235:Website lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. 267:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 712:Bloomin' heck! Floral prints are next for men 621: 602: 292:that a subject meets GNG, it is not itself a 250:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 8: 288:: This AfD makes no sense. SIGCOV creates a 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 811:-- the only awards it's received are from 714:was also "originally published on D'Marge". 264: 247: 299:The publication has syndicated pieces to 663:describes the magazine's rebrand and is 827: 823: 808: 804: 784:To add to all this, I want to address 747: 672: 668: 496: 492: 464: 456: 675:-- no significant, in-depth coverage. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 748:Shut Up & Take My Money, D’Marge 457:multiple non-trivial published works 635:source doesn't mention DMARGE once. 584:1. The article by Mumbrella titled 427:meets our guidelines for inclusion 640:Australian Financial Review source 24: 624:of what we stand for.” Says Lisa. 834:are "well known" or "notable." — 815:, which are by no means notable. 795:This magazine fails all four of 667:coverage, with coverage such as 599:because of the interview quote: 370:Oh, I see. Do you mean this one 94:Introduction to deletion process 830:None of the sources listed in 742:17. The coverage of DMARGE in 700:" is also routine in coverage. 1: 661:This other Mumbrella source 593:Australian Financial Review 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 894: 499:" aren't going to cut it. 731:16. This source, titled " 710:13. This source, titled " 696:11. This source, titled " 691:Same as the article above 309:The Sydney Morning Herald 867:Please do not modify it. 854:21:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC) 780:20:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC) 579:Source assessment below: 572:15:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC) 551:01:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC) 519:03:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 487:00:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC) 444:14:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC) 416:12:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) 381:04:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC) 366:02:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC) 352:00:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC) 333:12:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC) 278:12:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC) 259:09:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC) 242:09:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC) 64:04:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 832:#Awards and recognition 755:Targeted Media Services 705:This article by The Age 341:. As far as I'm aware, 626: 609: 166:edits since nomination 680:More routine coverage 82:Articles for deletion 818:This magazine fails 312:, finance magazine, 647:This Collective Hub 316:and tech magazine, 656:and lacks SIGCOV. 553: 549: 418: 280: 261: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 885: 840: 766: 616:Mumbrella source 543: 541: 539: 537: 505: 473: 454: 413: 408: 403: 401: 399: 275: 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 893: 892: 888: 887: 886: 884: 883: 882: 881: 875:deletion review 836: 762: 532: 530: 501: 469: 448: 411: 406: 394: 392: 377:MrsSnoozyTurtle 348:MrsSnoozyTurtle 271: 255:MrsSnoozyTurtle 238:MrsSnoozyTurtle 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 891: 889: 880: 879: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 816: 758: 751: 740: 729: 722: 715: 708: 701: 694: 687: 676: 657: 650: 643: 636: 629: 628: 627: 612: 611: 610: 606: 589: 581: 580: 574: 556: 555: 540: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 421: 420: 402: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 297: 282: 281: 262: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 890: 878: 876: 872: 868: 863: 862: 855: 851: 848: 845: 841: 839: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793: 791: 787: 783: 782: 781: 777: 774: 771: 767: 765: 759: 756: 752: 749: 745: 741: 738: 734: 730: 727: 723: 720: 716: 713: 709: 706: 702: 699: 695: 692: 688: 685: 681: 677: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 655: 651: 648: 644: 641: 637: 634: 633:Campaign Asia 630: 625: 620: 619: 617: 613: 608: 601: 600: 598: 594: 590: 587: 583: 582: 578: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 558: 557: 554: 552: 548: 547: 538: 535: 528: 527: 520: 516: 513: 510: 506: 504: 498: 494: 490: 489: 488: 484: 481: 478: 474: 472: 466: 462: 458: 452: 447: 446: 445: 441: 437: 434: 430: 426: 423: 422: 419: 417: 414: 409: 400: 397: 390: 382: 379: 378: 373: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 350: 349: 344: 340: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 320: 315: 311: 310: 305: 304: 298: 295: 291: 287: 284: 283: 279: 276: 274: 268: 263: 260: 257: 256: 251: 246: 245: 244: 243: 240: 239: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 866: 864: 846: 837: 772: 763: 684:WP:CORPDEPTH 622: 603: 576: 559: 546:CycloneYoris 545: 531: 529: 511: 502: 479: 470: 424: 393: 391: 376: 347: 317: 313: 307: 300: 293: 289: 285: 273:CAPTAIN RAJU 272: 254: 237: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 746:is simply " 744:this source 737:independent 597:independent 374:? Regards, 294:requirement 290:presumption 199:free images 820:WP:WEBCRIT 790:WP:WEBCRIT 665:WP:ROUTINE 451:Lightburst 436:Lightburst 429:WP:WEBCRIT 871:talk page 813:Mumbrella 801:#Criteria 314:Stockhead 37:talk page 873:or in a 638:5. This 614:3. This 564:BoraVoro 534:Relisted 396:Relisted 358:Jack4576 339:Jack4576 325:Jack4576 296:for GNG. 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 797:WP:NMAG 786:WP:NMAG 631:4. The 591:2. The 495:" and " 461:ROUTINE 433:WP:NMAG 319:Gizmodo 303:The Age 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 838:Nythar 764:Nythar 577:Delete 560:Delete 503:Nythar 471:Nythar 412:plicit 343:WP:GNG 337:Hello 177:Google 139:delete 118:DMARGE 70:DMARGE 50:delete 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 788:and 753:18. 726:This 724:15. 719:This 717:14. 703:12. 689:10. 671:and 568:talk 440:talk 431:and 425:Keep 362:talk 329:talk 286:Keep 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 799:'s 678:9. 659:8. 652:7. 645:6. 605:it. 227:TWL 160:– ( 52:‎. 852:) 850:🍀 844:💬 792:: 778:) 776:🍀 770:💬 570:) 517:) 515:🍀 509:💬 485:) 483:🍀 477:💬 463:, 442:) 364:) 331:) 306:, 269:. 252:. 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 60:iz 847:- 842:( 773:- 768:( 760:— 739:. 693:. 686:. 566:( 512:- 507:( 480:- 475:( 453:: 449:@ 438:( 407:✗ 360:( 327:( 321:" 301:" 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 57:L

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Liz
04:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
DMARGE

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
DMARGE
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑