380:, which is where the second shift page appropriately redirected before Uncle G changed it). There's even a comment on the "double burden" talk page saying "second shift" should not redirect to it because "nintey-five percent" of users will not benefit from this counter-intuitive redirect. Apparently Uncle G is putting zero effort into what he's doing, since the "shift work" page still says "second shift" will redirect to it. Additionally, "first shift" and "third shift" redirects to "shift work", so it is extremely foolish to have "second shift" redirect somewhere else. EDIT: I have restored the 'second shift' redirect to 'shift work', as the change was made without discussion and contrary to previously expressed opinions. A proper discussion should be held before the redirect is changed.
326:. I did look through the web source, which doesn't use the term, as I said. I also did a web search for "double burden" and found pages on malnutrition, racism, obesity, etc. Most of the pages that come up seem to be related to income and nutrition and the relation between these things. I don't happen to have the book or be an expert in sociology, so I haven't done my homework and I don't know what I'm talking about? Apparently you both have sociology backgrounds and Uncle G has the very book. And yet look, Latte hasn't ever heard "double burden" used in this way.
293:: I agree with Uncle G that nominators ought to do their homework before heading to AfD. Having some background in sociology myself, I have a strong intuition that "second shift" is the more famous term; I'd never heard of "double burden," and must confess I have trouble distinguishing between the two, and thus don't understand why two terms are being used at all. The source I cited above uses them interchangeably. In any event, this is most certainly
350:
I'm sure the nomination was made in good faith, and I apologize if I seem to have implied otherwise. Different people will conduct different searches, which will yield different results. However, given the results that Uncle G and I came up with, it would seem that the appropriate place to discuss
132:
Sort of a neologism, or perhaps more correctly trying to define a reasonably common phrase with a particular defintion that is not universal. Weakly sourced (the web source doesn't even use the phrase "double burden"), seems more like original research. I don't see why this phrase with this
329:
I'm disgusted with you, "Uncle G". You repeatedly insult me in an unjustified manner and make ridiculous claims like I "made zero effort whatsoever". You don't know what I'm doing. I certainly haven't been screaming that this article should be deleted, I put in on AfD so rational
376:: renaming the article to "Second Shift" without the "(sociology)" bit would keep the same problem of it having a name that the average person wouldn't associate with the topic and seems more appropriately applied to a different area (i.e.
221:, and published by the University of Wisconsin Press, is not a weak source for a sociology subject. This is an expert writing in her field of expertise. Moen uses the name "double burden". As do Weatherall, Joshi, Macran in
251:
The nominator has clearly made zero effort whatsoever in looking for sources, even after it was shown by example that sources exist. Xe hasn't even looked at the sources cited. Not following the instructions in
270:
You should look for sources yourself before nominating articles for deletion. You do not help
Wikpedia one bit by repeatedly nominating articles for deletion instead of working on improving them.
125:
199:
Second shift only redirected to this title because Uncle G changed it today, without discussion, in response to this proposed deletion. I have restored the redirect to shift work.
300:, so this should be a talk page discussion about whether to rename the article, about how to distinguish between "double burden" and "second shift," etc.—
241:, and she calls it a "double burden" on the very page number given in the citation. In the same book, on page 122, Judith P. Zinsser, professor at
257:
17:
92:
87:
96:
79:
253:
49:
265:
429:
261:
36:
246:
237:). And those were just picked at random. Barbara Engel, cited in the further reading section, is a professor at the
403:
I thin it pretty much the standard term, but the subject is real, and if there;s a better title , we cn change it.
428:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
218:
185:
414:
389:
364:
360:
345:
313:
309:
280:
238:
208:
187:
168:
164:
142:
61:
57:
152:
180:
which currently redirects to this title (the sociology modifier would only make the title bulky). -
385:
352:
341:
204:
181:
138:
83:
356:
305:
276:
160:
156:
48:. No consensus to delete. The discussion on renaming can continue on the article's talk page (
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
242:
230:
217:
A book written by
Phyllis Moen, professor, McKnight Presidential Chair in Sociology, at the
53:
297:
133:
definition deserves a
Knowledge (XXG) page. Previously added PROD tag which was removed.
410:
381:
337:
200:
134:
75:
67:
272:
177:
113:
234:
377:
405:
422:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
to "Second shift (sociology)"—that's the term that
Hochschild
120:
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
432:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:an AfD. I encourage the nominator to withdraw.
268:will yield poor nominations such as this one.
249:, define "double burden" using that very name.
155:. "Double burden" has, however, been used by
8:
254:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to deletion#Nomination
225:(1994 Jan;38(2):285–297) and Oropesa in the
245:, and Bonnie S. Anderson, professor at the
266:User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage#What to do
258:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
262:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy
1:
415:08:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
390:20:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
365:11:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
346:20:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
333:civil people could discuss it
314:16:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
281:13:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
209:00:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
188:09:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
169:01:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
143:01:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
62:03:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
247:City University of New York
223:Social Science and Medicine
449:
235:10.1177/019251393014003006
425:Please do not modify it.
227:Journal of Family Issues
32:Please do not modify it.
219:University of Minnesota
336:. Some administrator.
239:University of Colorado
355:rather than here.
353:Talk:Double burden
322:Wow, you guys are
44:The result was
50:non-admin closure
440:
427:
351:this article is
243:Miami University
123:
117:
99:
34:
448:
447:
443:
442:
441:
439:
438:
437:
436:
430:deletion review
423:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
446:
444:
435:
434:
418:
417:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
370:
369:
368:
367:
327:
317:
316:
285:
284:
214:
213:
212:
211:
191:
190:
171:
157:other scholars
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
445:
433:
431:
426:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
407:
402:
399:
398:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
371:
366:
362:
358:
354:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
328:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
283:
282:
278:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
172:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:famously uses
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:Double burden
73:
72:
69:
68:Double burden
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
424:
421:
404:
400:
373:
357:Cosmic Latte
332:
331:
323:
306:Cosmic Latte
301:
294:
290:
269:
250:
226:
222:
196:
178:Second shift
173:
161:Cosmic Latte
148:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
54:Ron Ritzman
378:shift work
401:Weak keep
382:Some guy
338:Some guy
201:Some guy
197:Comment:
135:Some guy
126:View log
374:Comment
291:Comment
273:Uncle G
93:protect
88:history
264:, and
174:Rename
149:Rename
121:delete
97:delete
324:dicks
298:WP:OR
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
411:talk
386:talk
361:talk
342:talk
310:talk
277:talk
205:talk
165:talk
139:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
406:DGG
302:not
295:not
231:doi
182:Mgm
176:to
413:)
388:)
363:)
344:)
312:)
279:)
260:,
256:,
207:)
167:)
159:.
141:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
409:(
384:(
359:(
340:(
308:(
275:(
233::
229:(
203:(
184:|
163:(
137:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.