135:
notability but goes even further away from neutral point of view, the worst offender being the sentence "Nevertheless, it was the child who shyly said that the
Emperor had no clothes who turned out to have had the better view of the matter." I would re-write the article, but having had a look through Ghits, Gnews and Gbooks, I can't find anything to support notability - just purchase sites, wiki mirrors, one review on a possible self-published site, and a few trivial mentions. I'm happy for someone to step in and salvage this, but I can't find any reason to do so myself.
134:
This article was created earlier this month and tagged straight away for conflict of interest and notability, mainly because it appears to be a relative of David Hurst who is writing an article. Since then, the same author has added further text which not only does nothing to address the matter of
250:
saying that the pen-name "Tiresias" used for that book is actually associated with this guy! If he actually did write that book it seems to not have gotten anyone's attention at all.
127:
246:. I did some poking around on google scholar for the first book "The London Dialogues" and it seems to not be referenced in anything. Also, I can't even find a single
200:
174:
153:- subject may be notable but there is no evidence of it! If he is worthy of an encyclopedia article, the article needs to be re-written with a NPOV anyway.
267:-- The book is on an academic subject, but the author is not an academic, but a school teacher. The publisher is also a non-academic one.
17:
94:
89:
98:
211:
185:
140:
237:
81:
291:
36:
290:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
207:
181:
136:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
272:
233:
61:
158:
276:
259:
215:
189:
162:
144:
63:
268:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
255:
154:
85:
229:
247:
115:
251:
77:
69:
284:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
228:
is the only thing that has some hits, but not enough for
122:
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
201:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
175:list of England-related deletion discussions
195:
169:
199:: This debate has been included in the
173:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
311:
277:22:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
260:14:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
216:11:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
190:11:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
163:10:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
145:10:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
64:02:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
48:. Closed a bit early per
287:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
224:, unsourced. The book
208:Chris Neville-Smith
182:Chris Neville-Smith
137:Chris Neville-Smith
44:The result was
218:
204:
192:
178:
302:
289:
205:
179:
125:
119:
101:
57:
34:
310:
309:
305:
304:
303:
301:
300:
299:
298:
292:deletion review
285:
248:reliable source
121:
92:
76:
73:
55:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
308:
306:
297:
296:
280:
279:
262:
241:
219:
193:
166:
165:
132:
131:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
307:
295:
293:
288:
282:
281:
278:
274:
270:
269:Peterkingiron
266:
263:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:On Westernism
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
183:
176:
172:
168:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
148:
147:
146:
142:
138:
129:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
286:
283:
264:
243:
236:, 2009-04-19
225:
221:
196:
170:
150:
133:
56:Juliancolton
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:HJ Mitchell
78:David Hurst
70:David Hurst
128:View log
234:Jeandré
95:protect
90:history
50:WP:SNOW
265:Delete
252:Cazort
244:Delete
240:12:15z
230:wp:bio
222:Delete
151:Delete
123:delete
99:delete
46:delete
232:. --
126:) – (
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
273:talk
256:talk
212:talk
197:Note
186:talk
171:Note
159:talk
141:talk
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
52:. –
275:)
258:)
214:)
203:.
188:)
177:.
161:)
143:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
60:|
271:(
254:(
238:t
210:(
206:—
184:(
180:—
157:(
139:(
130:)
120:(
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.