422:
the local edition of theNYT, an no more significant than any other local paper.If kept,. the material other than the filmmaking should be deleted or shortened, with a link to the article on Thomas. With respect to her, its a noteworthy even (though the article is overdetailed and citebombed), but not with respect to him. Some of the comments above are "other stuff exists". And, most of all, I cannot figure out the nefarious motivation in the "pattern".
421:
Minor filmaker, whose notability is ONEEVENT, related to Helen Thomas. Refs1-3 and 20 through 35 refer only to the encounter with Thomas. Refs 15-19 aretrvial coverage or non-third party sources. The only sources worth serious consideration is 14.LATimes and possibly 13 NYT. Refs 8,11 & 12 are
198:
255:
192:
159:
289:
272:
106:
91:
132:
127:
136:
119:
86:
79:
17:
348:
213:
180:
100:
96:
513:
446:
40:
174:
492:
496:
479:
450:
433:
412:
376:
339:
324:
298:
281:
264:
247:
170:
61:
356:
123:
509:
36:
220:
442:
347:
What makes him notable is the significant coverage he has received in independent, reliable sources.
320:
57:
115:
67:
488:
369:
206:
466:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
508:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
405:
394:
332:
312:
308:
240:
230:
186:
472:
458:
316:
53:
364:
293:
276:
259:
462:
429:
234:
153:
424:
307:
this article looks notable to me. I do dare someone to go after
504:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
363:
are the first two references I checked. He is clearly notable.
256:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
149:
145:
141:
205:
315:these two men aren't notable, and never will be.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
516:). No further edits should be made to this page.
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:Note: This discussion has been included in the
441:this is a clear case of one event notability.
290:list of New York-related deletion discussions
219:
8:
273:list of Judaism-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
287:
270:
253:
52:. Following the astute reasoning of DGG.
387:::::That is a clear pattern. Close it.
487:, for the reasons given to keep this.
229:No indication of being notable. Fails
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
533:
497:05:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
62:12:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
480:05:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
451:20:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
434:05:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
413:17:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
401:09:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
377:00:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
340:22:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
325:21:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
299:20:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
282:20:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
265:20:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
248:19:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
506:Please do not modify it.
329:What makes him notable?
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
389:Nomination Withdrawn
443:John Pack Lambert
359:Los Angeles Times
301:
284:
267:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
524:
477:
469:
410:
408:
399:
397:
374:
372:Let's discuss it
337:
335:
313:Raymond Cottrell
309:Hendrik Sumendap
296:
279:
262:
245:
243:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
523:
522:
521:
520:
514:deletion review
473:
467:
461:applies. Fails
406:
404:
395:
393:
370:
333:
331:
294:
277:
260:
241:
239:
237:. Spam target.
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
530:
528:
519:
518:
500:
499:
489:Davidgoodheart
482:
453:
436:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
351:New York Times
302:
285:
268:
227:
226:
163:
116:David Nesenoff
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
68:David Nesenoff
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
529:
517:
515:
511:
507:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
470:
464:
460:
457:
454:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
435:
431:
427:
426:
420:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
409:
402:
400:
398:
390:
378:
375:
373:
368:
367:
362:
360:
354:
352:
346:
343:
342:
341:
338:
336:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
300:
297:
291:
286:
283:
280:
274:
269:
266:
263:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
244:
236:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
505:
503:
484:
474:
455:
438:
423:
418:
403:
392:
388:
386:
385:
371:
365:
358:
350:
344:
330:
304:
238:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
407:scope_creep
396:scope_creep
334:scope_creep
242:scope_creep
193:free images
317:Catfurball
54:Randykitty
510:talk page
485:Week keep
355:and also
295:Spiderone
278:Spiderone
261:Spiderone
231:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
512:or in a
459:WP:BLP1E
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
361:article
353:article
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
463:WP:GNG
456:Delete
439:Delete
419:Delete
366:Cullen
235:WP:BIO
171:Google
137:delete
50:delete
475:SPEAK
468:KidAd
430:talk
357:this
349:This
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
493:talk
447:talk
345:Keep
321:talk
311:and
305:Keep
233:and
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
425:DGG
221:TWL
158:– (
495:)
471:•
465:.
449:)
432:)
391:.
323:)
292:.
275:.
258:.
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
491:(
445:(
428:(
319:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.