335:(e.g. include dates and full article titles), not just for pedantic purposes but because it makes it easier to tell what is being cited. I also recommend leaving the first paragraph as the introductory material, and creating a section immediately after with a heading like "Professional activity". Right now the intro is too long, and the remainder of the article is only lists. It'll look much better with a shorter intro and more text. Of the lists, I would leave only the major awards (although each needs a citation), and perhaps a selected list of books (but not all). At that point it should look like a good WP article for an academic. (I'll start the talk page with these suggestions.)
356:#C6 for President of the Romanian Society of Neurology. He's a prolific author, but only one paper with 100 cites in GS and cites go down rapidly from there. The scientific achievements are hard for a lay person to decipher. I have no idea how significant they are. The article should say. I agree that the CV stuff should be trimmed drastically. At least move the awards and memberships out of the lead. The "Information related to scientific activity" section should be rewritten as a text paragraph, which could replace a lot of the CV material. –
301:. He may be notable, but it is difficult to tell with all the apparent puffery here. For instance, I believe that none of the long list of memberships in societies count for much; they belong in a cv, not in an encyclopedia article. In particular becoming a member (not fellow) of AAAS is something anyone who cares to subscribe to
52:. I am closing this as delete, despite lingering doubts about possible notability. The article as it currently stands is basically irredeemable: it reads like a CV, is full of unsourced stuff, and much of what is there really is trivial (society memberships and such). Hence: delete per
330:
but fix up. I agree with the above comment that too much of what is here is CV material. Also, most of the assertions about positions and membership are as yet unsourced. I cleaned up a few refs and added some 'cite needed' notes. The citations need to be brought more into line with
425:
421:
170:
234:
123:
164:
278:
256:
212:
I do think there's a chance this individual may be notable, but we do need a discussion first. If someone can show evidence of notability as defined by
202:
130:
206:
96:
91:
100:
420:: Rumanian subject is apparently well-credentialed, but otherwise lacks notability for en.wi. (Added missing AfD tag to creator's TP.)--
309:
make it clear that this level of membership is open to all tenured faculty; that is, it is not the highly selective honor considered by
209:
is an independent source, but only has passing mention of the subject. Other than that, the sources are all connected with the subject.
83:
17:
185:
152:
393:
373:
448:
40:
201:
As far as the sources presented are concerned, there really is no indication of encyclopedic notability. At first,
146:
429:
410:
385:
365:
344:
322:
318:
290:
270:
248:
226:
65:
142:
87:
265:
243:
192:
444:
382:
36:
79:
71:
361:
61:
56:
without prejudice to recreation of a well-sourced article, if notability can be shown unequivocally.
314:
178:
353:
158:
286:
260:
238:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
443:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
332:
310:
213:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
406:
340:
217:
205:
looks promising, but it's actually a press release, and in any case isn't really quotable.
53:
357:
221:
57:
282:
117:
402:
336:
396:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
376:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
352:– My feeling is that he's probably notable, but it's hard to tell. Perhaps
220:, I'd be glad to reconsider, but that just isn't apparent at the moment. -
305:
does. Being a Fellow of ANA seems superficially to be more promising, but
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:
235:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
177:
401:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
381:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
451:). No further edits should be made to this page.
279:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
277:Note: This debate has been included in the
257:list of Romania-related deletion discussions
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
276:
254:
232:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
411:15:34, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
386:08:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
366:04:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
345:01:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
323:06:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
307:their membership requirements
291:03:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
271:02:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
249:02:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
227:01:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
430:17:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
66:14:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
468:
440:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
422:Раціональне анархіст
413:
388:
293:
273:
251:
225:
80:Dafin F. Muresanu
72:Dafin F. Muresanu
459:
442:
400:
398:
380:
378:
268:
263:
246:
241:
224:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
457:
456:
455:
449:deletion review
438:
414:
391:
389:
371:
266:
261:
244:
239:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
465:
463:
454:
453:
433:
432:
399:
390:
379:
370:
369:
368:
347:
325:
315:David Eppstein
295:
294:
274:
252:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
464:
452:
450:
446:
441:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
397:
395:
387:
384:
377:
375:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
269:
264:
258:
253:
250:
247:
242:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
223:
219:
215:
210:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
439:
436:
417:
392:
383:NorthAmerica
372:
349:
327:
302:
298:
262:Everymorning
240:Everymorning
211:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
165:free images
358:Margin1522
311:WP:PROF#C3
222:Biruitorul
58:Randykitty
445:talk page
283:• Gene93k
37:talk page
447:or in a
394:Relisted
374:Relisted
354:WP:NPROF
124:View log
39:or in a
333:WP:CITE
303:Science
299:Comment
214:WP:PROF
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
418:Delete
403:Michig
337:LaMona
218:WP:BIO
143:Google
101:delete
54:WP:TNT
50:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
426:talk
407:talk
362:talk
350:Keep
341:talk
328:Keep
319:talk
287:talk
267:talk
245:talk
207:This
203:this
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
313:. —
216:or
193:TWL
122:– (
428:)
409:)
364:)
343:)
321:)
289:)
281:.
259:.
237:.
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
424:(
405:(
360:(
339:(
317:(
285:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.